Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Curriculum decisions should consider learning outcomes, health, and age-appropriate pedagogy. Arguments gain strength when they cite plausible benefits and weaken when they rely on fear appeals without mechanism.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Argument I links the policy to reduced stigma and improved knowledge—core educational aims. Argument II predicts increased wrongdoing without explaining how accurate information creates harm; this is speculative and weak.
Step-by-Step Solution:
I: Relevant to student welfare—strong.II: Causal claim without support—weak.
Final Answer:
Only Argument I is strong.
Discussion & Comments