Statement–Argument (Ban Foreign Films): Statement: Should foreign films be banned in India? Arguments: I) Yes, they depict alien culture that harms our values. II) No, foreign films are of high artistic standard. Choose which argument is strong.

Introduction / Context:
Censorship requires concrete, demonstrable harm and proportional response. Cultural discomfort alone or praise of quality alone does not settle the ban question.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Argument I: Vague harm to “values” without mechanism or evidence; ignores classification/certification alternatives.
• Argument II: High artistic standard is positive but not, by itself, a reason against a ban if there were actual harm.

Concept / Approach:
Strong arguments must evaluate necessity and proportionality. Neither I nor II addresses concrete harm standards or tailored regulation; hence both are weak.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Assess I: Speculative “harm” with no nexus ⇒ weak.Assess II: Quality is orthogonal to censorship criteria ⇒ weak.

Verification / Alternative check:
Film boards typically use ratings/content advisories; that middle path undermines the premise of a blanket ban.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Favouring one side elevates an inadequate rationale; “either” is unjustified.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing taste with public harm; ignoring less-restrictive means.

Final Answer:
if neither I nor II is strong.