Statement–Argument (Autonomous Professional Courses): Statement: Should professional colleges be encouraged to run their own courses without university affiliation? Arguments: I) Yes, it is the only way to create more opportunities for professional training. II) No, this may dilute quality because not all colleges are equipped to run such courses. Choose which argument is strong.

Introduction / Context:
Affiliation provides quality assurance, curriculum standards, and examination integrity. Opportunity expansion is important but not “the only way.”

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Argument I: Overstates necessity (“only way”), ignoring alternatives (expanding seats, better accreditation, new universities).
• Argument II: Raises a valid risk—variable capacity without oversight can dilute standards.

Concept / Approach:
Strong arguments avoid false necessity and identify concrete quality mechanisms. II meets this test; I does not.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Evaluate I: Fallacy of exclusivity ⇒ weak.Evaluate II: Quality control concern ⇒ strong.

Verification / Alternative check:
Autonomy works when paired with rigorous accreditation—again underscoring II’s point.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Either/neither” misreads; “only I” ignores quality safeguards.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming autonomy alone creates capacity without standards.

Final Answer:
if only Argument II is strong.