Statement & Argument — Would dividing states into smaller districts be beneficial? Arguments: I. Yes; smaller districts allow tighter administration and better local grip on issues. II. No; this would unnecessarily increase administrative expenditure.

Introduction / Context:
Redistricting trades administrative proximity against fixed costs. Both sides can be strong when they point to core governance criteria: responsiveness versus efficiency.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Smaller units can improve supervision and service delivery.
• Creating new units adds overhead (offices, staff, logistics).

Concept / Approach:
A strong “Yes” argument shows improved outcomes; a strong “No” argument highlights waste or duplication. Each presented argument fits these lines.

Step-by-Step Solution:
I: Cites administrative grip and integration—strong.II: Cites cost escalations—also strong.

Final Answer:
Either Argument I or II is strong.