Statement & Argument — Would dividing states into smaller districts be beneficial? Arguments: I. Yes; smaller districts allow tighter administration and better local grip on issues. II. No; this would unnecessarily increase administrative expenditure.
Verbal Reasoning
Statement and Argument
Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
-
Aif only argument I is strong
-
Bif only argument II is strong
-
Cif either I or II is strong
-
Dif neither I nor II is strong.
-
ENone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: if either I or II is strong
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Redistricting trades administrative proximity against fixed costs. Both sides can be strong when they point to core governance criteria: responsiveness versus efficiency.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Smaller units can improve supervision and service delivery.
- Creating new units adds overhead (offices, staff, logistics).
Concept / Approach:A strong “Yes” argument shows improved outcomes; a strong “No” argument highlights waste or duplication. Each presented argument fits these lines.
Step-by-Step Solution:I: Cites administrative grip and integration—strong.II: Cites cost escalations—also strong.
Final Answer:Either Argument I or II is strong.