Statement–Argument (Special Treatment for the Prestigious): Statement: Should prestigious people who commit crimes receive special treatment? Arguments: I) Yes, prestigious people do not commit crimes intentionally. II) No, everybody is equal before the law; special treatment is improper. Choose which argument is strong.
-
Aif only Argument I is strong
-
Bif only Argument II is strong
-
Cif either I or II is strong
-
Dif both I and II are strong
-
ENone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: if only Argument II is strong
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Rule of law requires equal treatment; status-based exemptions undermine justice and deterrence.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Argument I: Asserts lack of intent due to prestige—unsupported and contrary to legal principles.
- Argument II: Reaffirms equality before law—central to a fair justice system.
Concept / Approach:Only argument II meets the criterion of a strong argument by appealing to a foundational legal principle applicable to the decision.
Step-by-Step Solution:Test I: Status ≠ innocence; mens rea and evidence determine intent ⇒ weak.Test II: Equal application of law ensures legitimacy ⇒ strong.
Verification / Alternative check:Special treatment erodes trust and encourages impunity.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:“Either/both/neither” misclassify; only II is defensible.
Common Pitfalls:Conflating fame with credibility.
Final Answer:if only Argument II is strong.