Question 1

In coordinate geometry, what are the coordinates of the reflection of the point (5, −2) in the vertical line x = −1?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests reflection of a point in a vertical line in the coordinate plane. Understanding how reflections affect x and y coordinates is fundamental in coordinate geometry and helps in reasoning about symmetry and transformations. Given Data / Assumptions: Original point P has coordinates (5, −2). The mirror line is the vertical line x = −1. We seek the reflected point P prime across this line. The coordinate system is the standard Cartesian plane. Concept / Approach: Reflection in a vertical line x = k preserves the y coordinate and changes the x coordinate in such a way that the point and its reflection are equally distant from the line on opposite sides. If the original x coordinate is x1, then the reflected x coordinate x2 satisfies x2 − k = −(x1 − k), which simplifies to x2 = 2k − x1. The y coordinate remains unchanged because the reflection occurs horizontally. Step-by-Step Solution: The mirror line is x = −1, so k = −1. The original point is (5, −2), so x1 = 5 and y1 = −2. Under reflection in a vertical line, the y coordinate remains the same: y2 = −2. Compute the horizontal distance from the point to the line: 5 − (−1) = 6 units. The reflected point lies 6 units on the other side of the line, so its x coordinate is −1 − 6 = −7. Alternatively, use the formula x2 = 2k − x1 = 2 * (−1) − 5 = −2 − 5 = −7. Thus the reflected point has coordinates (−7, −2). Verification / Alternative check: Check that the line x = −1 is the perpendicular bisector of the segment joining (5, −2) and (−7, −2). The midpoint of these points is ((5 + (−7))/2, (−2 + (−2))/2) = (−2/2, −4/2) = (−1, −2). The x coordinate of the midpoint equals −1, which lies on the mirror line x = −1, and the line segment from the original point to the reflection is horizontal, confirming a correct reflection in a vertical line. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The point (7, −2) lies on the opposite side of the origin and is farther from x = −1 than the original point. The points (5, 0) and (5, 2) change the y coordinate instead of the x coordinate, which would correspond to reflection in a horizontal line, not a vertical one. The point (−3, −2) is only 2 units away from x = −1, not 6 units, so it does not maintain equal distance on both sides of the line. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to move the point in the vertical direction when reflecting in a vertical line, or to subtract the distance only once rather than mirroring it across the line. Using the formula x2 = 2k − x1 and keeping y unchanged provides a quick and reliable way to avoid such errors. Final Answer: The reflection of (5, −2) in the line x = −1 is (−7, −2).

Question 2

Point A divides the line segment BC internally in the ratio 4 : 1. If the coordinates of B are (6, 1) and the coordinates of C are (7/2, 6), then what are the exact coordinates of point A? Use the internal section formula and keep the final coordina…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This coordinate-geometry problem tests the section formula (internal division). When a point divides a line segment joining two points in a given ratio internally, its coordinates are a weighted average of the endpoints. The key is to interpret the ratio correctly and apply the formula separately to the x-coordinate and y-coordinate. Because the given point C contains a fraction (7/2), careful arithmetic is required to avoid errors. These questions are common in aptitude exams because they check both conceptual understanding (how ratios work on a segment) and accuracy with fractions. Given Data / Assumptions: • B = (6, 1) • C = (7/2, 6) • A divides BC internally in the ratio 4 : 1 (BA : AC = 4 : 1) • Required: coordinates of A Concept / Approach: Internal section formula: If A divides B(x1, y1) and C(x2, y2) in ratio m:n internally (BA:AC = m:n), then Ax = (m*x2 + n*x1) / (m + n) Ay = (m*y2 + n*y1) / (m + n) Here m = 4 and n = 1, so A is closer to C because the weight on C is larger. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify m = 4, n = 1, B(6, 1), C(7/2, 6). 2) Compute x-coordinate: Ax = (4*(7/2) + 1*6) / 5 Ax = (14 + 6) / 5 = 20/5 = 4 3) Compute y-coordinate: Ay = (4*6 + 1*1) / 5 Ay = (24 + 1) / 5 = 25/5 = 5 4) Therefore A = (4, 5). Verification / Alternative check: Since BA:AC = 4:1, A should lie closer to C than to B. C has y = 6 and B has y = 1, so A having y = 5 is closer to 6, which matches the ratio intuition. Also, substituting into the weighted-average formula confirms the exact result without approximation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • (4, 3) and (3, 5): come from mixing up x and y calculations or using the wrong weights. • (5, 4): often results from reversing B and C in the formula. • (2, 5): indicates an arithmetic mistake while handling 7/2. Common Pitfalls: • Reversing the ratio (using 1:4 instead of 4:1). • Forgetting that the larger weight applies to the opposite endpoint in the numerator (m multiplies C when ratio is BA:AC = m:n). • Errors while simplifying 4*(7/2). Final Answer: (4, 5)

Question 3

What is the simplified numerical value of (1/2) sec 30° + √2 tan 60°? Use the exact standard trigonometric values and express the final answer in simplest surd form.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem tests exact-value evaluation in trigonometry using standard angles (30° and 60°). The goal is not a decimal approximation but a simplified surd expression. You must know or derive sec 30° and tan 60° exactly. A common source of mistakes is mixing up sec and cosec, or incorrectly handling the factor (1/2) in front of sec 30°. Another common error is multiplying surds incorrectly when computing √2 * tan 60°. The best approach is to compute each term exactly and then add them using a common denominator only if needed. Given Data / Assumptions: • Expression: (1/2) sec 30° + √2 tan 60° • Use exact values: cos 30° = √3/2 and tan 60° = √3 • sec θ = 1 / cos θ Concept / Approach: Compute sec 30° from cos 30°, then multiply by 1/2. Separately compute √2 tan 60° using the exact tan 60° value. Finally, add the two exact terms. If the result has mixed forms, rewrite them over a common denominator (often √3) to match standard simplified options. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Compute sec 30°: sec 30° = 1 / cos 30° = 1 / (√3/2) = 2/√3 2) Multiply by 1/2: (1/2) sec 30° = (1/2) * (2/√3) = 1/√3 3) Compute √2 tan 60°: tan 60° = √3, so √2 tan 60° = √2 * √3 = √6 4) Add the terms: √6 + 1/√3 5) Write √6 with denominator √3: √6 = (√6 * √3) / √3 = √18 / √3 = (3√2)/√3 6) Final sum: (3√2)/√3 + 1/√3 = (1 + 3√2)/√3 Verification / Alternative check: Approximation check: sec 30° ≈ 1.1547, so (1/2)sec 30° ≈ 0.57735. Also √2 tan 60° ≈ 1.4142 * 1.732 ≈ 2.449. Sum ≈ 3.026. The option (1 + 3√2)/√3 ≈ (1 + 4.2426)/1.732 ≈ 3.026, matching perfectly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • √3 + 2 and (√3 + 2)/2: come from using tan 60° as 2 or using sec 30° incorrectly. • (√3 + 2)/√3: mixes terms as if √6 were √3. • (3 + √2)/√3: indicates incorrect surd multiplication √2*√3. Common Pitfalls: • Forgetting sec 30° is 2/√3, not √3/2. • Treating √2*√3 as √5 (wrong rule). • Dropping the (1/2) factor in the first term. Final Answer: (1 + 3√2)/√3

Question 4

In the right-angled triangle ΔDEF, right angled at E, if ∠D = 45°, what is the value of cosec F × cot D? Use angle-sum properties of a right triangle and exact standard trigonometric values.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks basic trigonometry in a right triangle, especially how angles relate and how to evaluate standard angles exactly. Since ΔDEF is right angled at E, the two acute angles D and F must add up to 90°. When one acute angle is 45°, the other is also 45°, creating a 45°-45°-90° triangle. In such a triangle, sin 45°, cosec 45°, tan 45°, and cot 45° are all standard values. The expression cosec F × cot D becomes a direct substitution problem once the angles are identified correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: • ΔDEF is right angled at E (∠E = 90°) • ∠D = 45° • Therefore ∠F = 45° (since D + F = 90°) • Required: cosec F × cot D Concept / Approach: Use triangle angle sum in a right triangle: ∠D + ∠F = 90°. Then evaluate: cosec 45° = 1 / sin 45° cot 45° = 1 / tan 45°. Finally multiply the exact values. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Since ∠E = 90°, the remaining angles satisfy: ∠D + ∠F = 90° 2) Given ∠D = 45°: ∠F = 90° - 45° = 45° 3) Compute cosec F: cosec 45° = 1 / (sin 45°) = 1 / (1/√2) = √2 4) Compute cot D: cot 45° = 1 5) Multiply: cosec F × cot D = √2 * 1 = √2 Verification / Alternative check: In a 45°-45°-90° triangle, the legs are equal and the hypotenuse is √2 times a leg. That geometry implies sin 45° = 1/√2, hence cosec 45° = √2. Also tan 45° = 1, hence cot 45° = 1. The product must therefore be √2, consistent with the computed result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • 2: would require cosec 45° to be 2, which is incorrect. • 1/2 or 1/√2: come from confusing sin with cosec or taking reciprocal in the wrong direction. • 1: would be true only if cosec 45° were 1, which it is not. Common Pitfalls: • Forgetting that the two acute angles in a right triangle add to 90°. • Mixing up cosec and sec, or forgetting cosec is the reciprocal of sin. • Misremembering sin 45° as √2/2 but not converting correctly to cosec. Final Answer: √2

Question 5

If sec θ = 25/24 for an acute angle θ in a right-angled triangle, then what is the exact value of sin θ? Use the relationship between sec and cos, then apply the Pythagorean identity to find sin θ.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests how to convert one trigonometric ratio into another using right-triangle relationships. Given sec θ, you can immediately find cos θ because sec θ is the reciprocal of cos θ. Once cos θ is known, sin θ can be found using the Pythagorean identity sin^2 θ + cos^2 θ = 1. The “acute angle” condition matters because it ensures sin θ is positive, so you choose the positive square root. This is a standard aptitude pattern: derive triangle sides from a given ratio and then compute the required ratio exactly. Given Data / Assumptions: • sec θ = 25/24 • θ is acute, so sin θ > 0 • sec θ = 1 / cos θ • Identity: sin^2 θ + cos^2 θ = 1 Concept / Approach: First convert sec to cos: cos θ = 1/sec θ. Then use sin^2 θ = 1 - cos^2 θ. Finally take the positive square root because θ is acute. You can also interpret the ratio as a right triangle: sec θ = hypotenuse/adjacent, so hypotenuse = 25 and adjacent = 24, and the opposite side becomes 7 by Pythagoras, giving sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse = 7/25. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Convert sec θ to cos θ: sec θ = 25/24 ⇒ cos θ = 24/25 2) Square cos θ: cos^2 θ = (24/25)^2 = 576/625 3) Use sin^2 θ = 1 - cos^2 θ: sin^2 θ = 1 - 576/625 = (625 - 576)/625 = 49/625 4) Take square root (acute angle ⇒ positive): sin θ = √(49/625) = 7/25 Verification / Alternative check: Triangle check: sec θ = hypotenuse/adjacent = 25/24 means take hypotenuse = 25 and adjacent = 24. Then opposite = √(25^2 - 24^2) = √(625 - 576) = √49 = 7. So sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse = 7/25. Both methods match, confirming accuracy. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • 24/25 is cos θ, not sin θ. • 24/7 and 25/7 are incorrect reciprocals based on mixing up opposite and adjacent. • 1/25 has no basis in the correct triangle side relationships. Common Pitfalls: • Forgetting sec is the reciprocal of cos. • Using sin^2 = 1 + cos^2 (wrong sign). • Taking the negative root even though θ is acute. Final Answer: 7/25

Question 6

What is the exact value of (cosec 30° − 1/√3)? Use standard trigonometric values and simplify the final answer into a single simplified surd expression.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem tests exact-value evaluation using standard angles and basic surd simplification. The key is knowing cosec 30° exactly. Since sin 30° = 1/2, cosec 30° is the reciprocal, which equals 2. After substituting this value, the expression becomes a simple difference: 2 - 1/√3. To match typical multiple-choice answers, you rewrite 2 with denominator √3 so the result becomes a single fraction. Students often lose marks here because they misremember cosec 30° as √3/2, confuse cosec with sec, or forget how to combine a whole number with a surd fraction. Given Data / Assumptions: • Expression: cosec 30° − 1/√3 • sin 30° = 1/2 • cosec θ = 1 / sin θ • Required: exact simplified value Concept / Approach: Compute cosec 30° using the reciprocal of sin 30°. Then subtract 1/√3. For a clean final form, express 2 as (2√3)/√3 so the subtraction is over a common denominator √3. This yields a single simplified surd fraction that matches standard answer formats. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Evaluate cosec 30°: sin 30° = 1/2 ⇒ cosec 30° = 1/(1/2) = 2 2) Substitute into the expression: cosec 30° − 1/√3 = 2 − 1/√3 3) Write 2 with denominator √3: 2 = (2√3)/√3 4) Subtract: (2√3)/√3 − 1/√3 = (2√3 − 1)/√3 Verification / Alternative check: Approximation check: 1/√3 ≈ 0.577, so 2 − 1/√3 ≈ 1.423. The expression (2√3 − 1)/√3 equals 2 − 1/√3 by construction, so it must have the same approximate value, confirming the simplification is consistent. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • 2/√3: misses the “− 1” part in the numerator. • -1/√3: would imply cosec 30° = 0, which is incorrect. • (√3 − 4)/(2√3): comes from incorrect common-denominator steps. • (2√3 + 1)/√3: has the wrong sign (it adds instead of subtracting). Common Pitfalls: • Confusing cosec 30° with sec 30°. • Forgetting to use a common denominator when subtracting. • Treating 1/√3 as √3 (incorrect reciprocal handling). Final Answer: (2√3 − 1)/√3

Question 7

The average of 100 observations is 35. Later it is found that one observation was misread as 83 instead of 53. What is the correct average of the 100 observations after fixing this error? Give the exact corrected average as a decimal.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests error correction in averages. The average is defined as total sum divided by the number of observations. If one value is recorded incorrectly, the computed total sum becomes wrong by exactly the difference between the wrong value and the correct value. Instead of recomputing everything, you adjust the total sum by subtracting the extra amount (or adding the missing amount) and then divide again by the same number of observations. This is a very common aptitude pattern because it rewards recognizing that only one term changed, so the correction is quick and direct. Given Data / Assumptions: • Number of observations, n = 100 • Given average (based on misread data) = 35 • One observation was taken as 83 but should be 53 • Required: corrected average Concept / Approach: Compute the (incorrect) total sum using average * number of observations. Then correct that sum by removing the extra amount added due to misreading. Here, 83 instead of 53 means the total was too high by (83 - 53) = 30. Subtract 30 from the total, then divide by 100 to get the correct average. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Compute the total sum used originally: Sum_wrong = 35 * 100 = 3500 2) Find the error in the one observation: Error = 83 - 53 = 30 (sum is 30 too high) 3) Correct the total sum: Sum_correct = 3500 - 30 = 3470 4) Compute corrected average: Average_correct = 3470 / 100 = 34.7 Verification / Alternative check: A quick sense check: because the misread value (83) is larger than the correct value (53), the original average 35 must decrease after correction. The corrected average 34.7 is slightly smaller (by 0.3), which matches the fact that the total decreased by 30 over 100 observations (30/100 = 0.3). This confirms both the direction and size of correction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • 35.7 and 36.7: move in the wrong direction (average should go down, not up). • 32.7: would require a much larger correction (a 230 drop in total, not 30). • 34.3: corresponds to subtracting 70 instead of 30. Common Pitfalls: • Adding the error instead of subtracting it. • Dividing the error by 100 twice or not at all. • Recomputing using 83 + 53 (wrong idea) instead of using the difference. Final Answer: 34.7

Question 8

If √x − √y = 1 and √x + √y = 17, then what is the value of √(xy)? Solve for √x and √y first, then compute √(xy) exactly without approximation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This algebra question tests solving a system involving square roots by using addition and subtraction. The expressions √x − √y and √x + √y are given directly, which is ideal because you can add the equations to eliminate √y and subtract them to eliminate √x. Once you find √x and √y, you can compute √(xy) using the property √(xy) = √x * √y (for non-negative x and y). Students often make mistakes by squaring too early, mixing x with √x, or forgetting that the asked value is √(xy), not xy. The cleanest route is to treat √x and √y as variables and solve the linear system first. Given Data / Assumptions: • √x − √y = 1 • √x + √y = 17 • x and y are non-negative (so square roots are real) • Required: √(xy) Concept / Approach: Let p = √x and q = √y. Then: p − q = 1 and p + q = 17. Solve these two linear equations for p and q. Then use: √(xy) = √x * √y = p*q. This avoids unnecessary squaring and keeps the steps short and accurate. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Let p = √x and q = √y. 2) Then p − q = 1 and p + q = 17. 3) Add the equations: (p − q) + (p + q) = 1 + 17 ⇒ 2p = 18 ⇒ p = 9 4) Subtract the first from the second: (p + q) − (p − q) = 17 − 1 ⇒ 2q = 16 ⇒ q = 8 5) Compute √(xy): √(xy) = p*q = 9*8 = 72 Verification / Alternative check: If √x = 9 and √y = 8, then √x − √y = 9 − 8 = 1 and √x + √y = 9 + 8 = 17, matching both conditions. Also xy = (9^2)(8^2) = 81*64 = 5184, and √5184 = 72, confirming the same result by direct computation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • 24 and 32: come from adding or subtracting 9 and 8 incorrectly. • √72: confuses √(xy) with √x + √y style expressions. • 64: equals y, not √(xy). Common Pitfalls: • Treating √x as x and √y as y. • Squaring the equations immediately, creating extra terms and confusion. • Forgetting that √(xy) = √x * √y for non-negative x and y. Final Answer: 72

Question 9

If x = 1/(√2 + 1), then what is the exact value of x^2 + 2x − 1? Rationalize the denominator first so that x is written in a simpler surd form, then simplify fully.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem tests surd manipulation and simplification after rationalizing a denominator. Expressions like 1/(√2 + 1) become much easier to work with once you remove the surd from the denominator by multiplying numerator and denominator by the conjugate (√2 − 1). After rationalization, x becomes a simple surd expression, and then evaluating x^2 + 2x − 1 is straightforward by expansion and careful cancellation. Students often make mistakes by using the wrong conjugate, forgetting that (a + b)(a − b) = a^2 − b^2, or expanding x^2 incorrectly when x contains √2. The key to speed here is recognizing that x becomes (√2 − 1), which leads to neat cancellations in the expression. Given Data / Assumptions: • x = 1/(√2 + 1) • Required: x^2 + 2x − 1 • Use conjugate rationalization Concept / Approach: Rationalize: x = 1/(√2 + 1) * (√2 − 1)/(√2 − 1) = (√2 − 1)/(2 − 1) = √2 − 1. Then compute x^2, compute 2x, and add them with −1. Surd terms often cancel if you do it correctly. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Rationalize x using the conjugate: x = 1/(√2 + 1) * (√2 − 1)/(√2 − 1) 2) Simplify the denominator: (√2 + 1)(√2 − 1) = (√2)^2 − 1^2 = 2 − 1 = 1 3) Therefore: x = √2 − 1 4) Compute x^2: x^2 = (√2 − 1)^2 = 2 − 2√2 + 1 = 3 − 2√2 5) Compute 2x: 2x = 2(√2 − 1) = 2√2 − 2 6) Combine x^2 + 2x − 1: (3 − 2√2) + (2√2 − 2) − 1 = 0 Verification / Alternative check: Approximation check: x = 1/(√2 + 1) ≈ 1/2.414 ≈ 0.4142. Then x^2 + 2x − 1 ≈ 0.1716 + 0.8284 − 1 ≈ 0. This supports the exact result 0 and confirms the cancellation is correct, not accidental. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • 2 or 4: come from ignoring the −1 term or expanding (√2 − 1)^2 incorrectly. • 2√2: results from adding surd terms without cancelling the −2√2 from x^2. • 1: indicates incomplete simplification of constants (3 − 2 − 1). Common Pitfalls: • Using (√2 + 1) again instead of the conjugate (√2 − 1). • Forgetting that (√2)^2 = 2. • Making a sign error in (√2 − 1)^2, especially the middle term −2√2. Final Answer: 0

Question 10

If θ is an acute angle and sin(θ + 18°) = 1/2, then what is the value of θ in radians (circular measure)? Use the principal acute-angle solution for sine and convert the final angle from degrees to radians.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests solving a simple trigonometric equation involving sine and then converting degrees to radians. The key idea is recognizing when sin of an angle equals 1/2. The standard angles where sine equals 1/2 are 30° and 150° (within 0° to 180°). Because θ is given as an acute angle, θ lies between 0° and 90°. That means θ + 18° lies between 18° and 108°. In that range, the sine value 1/2 corresponds to 30° (not 150°). After finding θ in degrees, convert it to radians using the conversion factor radians = degrees * (π/180). Many mistakes happen when students choose the wrong sine angle (150°) or forget to subtract 18° after matching the sine value. Given Data / Assumptions: • θ is acute: 0° < θ < 90° • sin(θ + 18°) = 1/2 • Standard values: sin 30° = 1/2 • Required: θ in radians Concept / Approach: First find the angle α = θ + 18°. Since sin α = 1/2 and α must lie between 18° and 108°, select α = 30°. Then θ = 30° − 18° = 12°. Convert 12° to radians using π/180 per degree. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Let α = θ + 18°. 2) Given sin α = 1/2. 3) In the range relevant to an acute θ, take α = 30° (since sin 30° = 1/2). 4) Solve for θ: θ + 18° = 30° ⇒ θ = 12° 5) Convert 12° to radians: θ = 12 * (π/180) = π/15 Verification / Alternative check: Check by substitution: θ = 12° gives θ + 18° = 30°, and sin 30° = 1/2, which matches the condition exactly. Also, π/15 radians equals 12° because (π/15) * (180/π) = 12, confirming the conversion is consistent. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • π/12 corresponds to 15°, which would make θ + 18° = 33°, not a sine value of 1/2. • 2π/5 corresponds to 72°, too large for the computed θ. • 3π/13 is not a standard conversion here and does not satisfy the equation. • π/18 corresponds to 10°, which would give θ + 18° = 28°, not 30°. Common Pitfalls: • Choosing 150° instead of 30° for sin = 1/2, ignoring the acute constraint. • Forgetting to subtract 18° after identifying the sine angle. • Converting degrees to radians using the wrong factor (mixing 180/π and π/180). Final Answer: π/15

Question 11

If a(x + y) = b(x − y) = 2ab, then what is the value of 2(x^2 + y^2) in terms of a and b? Derive x and y from the given equalities and simplify the final expression completely.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This algebra question tests working with chained equalities and converting them into solvable equations. When you see a(x + y) = b(x − y) = 2ab, it means each expression equals the same common value (2ab). So you can create two separate equations: a(x + y) = 2ab and b(x − y) = 2ab. From these, you can find x + y and x − y directly, then solve for x and y. Finally, you compute x^2 + y^2 and multiply by 2. A powerful identity here is that x^2 + y^2 can be derived from (x + y)^2 and (x − y)^2, or by directly substituting x and y after solving. These problems are common in simplification because the arithmetic becomes clean once you interpret the equalities correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: • a(x + y) = 2ab • b(x − y) = 2ab • a and b are non-zero so division is valid • Required: 2(x^2 + y^2) in terms of a and b Concept / Approach: From a(x + y) = 2ab, divide by a to get x + y = 2b. From b(x − y) = 2ab, divide by b to get x − y = 2a. Then solve: x = ((x + y) + (x − y))/2 and y = ((x + y) − (x − y))/2. Compute x^2 + y^2 and multiply by 2. Simplification should lead to a clean expression in a^2 and b^2. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Since a(x + y) = 2ab, divide both sides by a: x + y = 2b 2) Since b(x − y) = 2ab, divide both sides by b: x − y = 2a 3) Add the two equations: (x + y) + (x − y) = 2b + 2a ⇒ 2x = 2(a + b) ⇒ x = a + b 4) Subtract the second from the first: (x + y) − (x − y) = 2b − 2a ⇒ 2y = 2(b − a) ⇒ y = b − a 5) Compute x^2 + y^2: x^2 + y^2 = (a + b)^2 + (b − a)^2 = (a^2 + 2ab + b^2) + (b^2 − 2ab + a^2) = 2a^2 + 2b^2 6) Multiply by 2: 2(x^2 + y^2) = 2(2a^2 + 2b^2) = 4(a^2 + b^2) Verification / Alternative check: Choose simple values a = 1, b = 2. Then x + y = 4 and x − y = 2. Solving gives x = 3 and y = 1. Now 2(x^2 + y^2) = 2(9 + 1) = 20. Formula gives 4(a^2 + b^2) = 4(1 + 4) = 20. Both match, confirming the result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • 2(a^2 + b^2): misses the final multiplication by 2 after finding x^2 + y^2. • 4(a^2 − b^2) and 2(a^2 − b^2): come from sign mistakes while squaring (b − a)^2. • 8ab: incorrectly assumes x^2 + y^2 becomes a product instead of a sum of squares. Common Pitfalls: • Forgetting that the chained equality means two separate equations equal to 2ab. • Dividing by a or b without noting they must be non-zero. • Expanding (b − a)^2 incorrectly as b^2 − a^2 instead of b^2 − 2ab + a^2. Final Answer: 4(a^2 + b^2)

Question 12

What are the coordinates of the reflection of the point (6, −1) in the line y = 2? This is a reflection across a horizontal line, so only the y-coordinate changes while x remains the same.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This coordinate-geometry problem tests reflection of a point across a line, specifically a horizontal line of the form y = k. Reflecting across a horizontal line is simpler than reflecting across a slanted line because the x-coordinate does not change. Only the y-coordinate shifts so that the reflected point is the same perpendicular distance from the line y = k but on the opposite side. A reliable method is to use the idea that the line y = k is the midpoint (average) of the original y and the reflected y. That means (y + y_reflected)/2 = k, so y_reflected = 2k − y. Students commonly make mistakes by changing the x-coordinate (which should remain unchanged) or by adding k instead of doubling it in the reflection formula. Given Data / Assumptions: • Original point P = (6, −1) • Mirror line: y = 2 (a horizontal line) • Required: reflected point P' across y = 2 Concept / Approach: For reflection across y = k: x_reflected = x (unchanged) y_reflected = 2k − y This works because the line y = k is the midpoint between y and y_reflected. Here k = 2 and y = −1, so y_reflected = 2*2 − (−1) = 5. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify k from the line y = 2: k = 2 2) Keep the x-coordinate the same (horizontal reflection): x' = 6 3) Compute the reflected y-coordinate: y' = 2k − y = 2*2 − (−1) = 4 + 1 = 5 4) Therefore the reflected point is: (6, 5) Verification / Alternative check: Distance check: The original y-coordinate is −1. The line y = 2 is 3 units above −1 (because 2 − (−1) = 3). The reflected point should be 3 units above y = 2, which gives y = 5. This matches the computed result and confirms the reflection is correct. Also, x remains 6 in both points, consistent with reflection across a horizontal line. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • (6, 1): would reflect across y = 0, not y = 2. • (−6, 5): incorrectly changes x, which should not happen for reflection across y = 2. • (−2, 1) and (−2, −1): change x with no basis and do not preserve perpendicular symmetry to y = 2. Common Pitfalls: • Changing x when reflecting across a horizontal line. • Using y' = k − y instead of y' = 2k − y. • Forgetting that the line of reflection must be the midpoint between the original and reflected y-values. Final Answer: (6, 5)

Question 13

If a + b = 10 and ab = 24, then what is the value of a^3 + b^3? Use algebraic identities to compute the value directly without solving for a and b separately.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests using algebraic identities to evaluate expressions involving a and b when their sum and product are given. Instead of solving for a and b individually (which is possible but unnecessary), you can compute a^3 + b^3 directly using the identity: a^3 + b^3 = (a + b)^3 − 3ab(a + b). This identity is especially useful in aptitude problems because it transforms a higher-power expression into something that depends only on (a + b) and ab, both of which are already provided. The main challenge is applying the identity correctly and handling arithmetic accurately when expanding (a + b)^3 and multiplying 3ab(a + b). Given Data / Assumptions: • a + b = 10 • ab = 24 • Required: a^3 + b^3 • Use identity: a^3 + b^3 = (a + b)^3 − 3ab(a + b) Concept / Approach: Compute (a + b)^3 using the given sum. Then compute 3ab(a + b) using the given product and sum. Subtract the second from the first to obtain a^3 + b^3. This avoids quadratic solving and gives the value in a few steps. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Use the identity: a^3 + b^3 = (a + b)^3 − 3ab(a + b) 2) Compute (a + b)^3: (a + b)^3 = 10^3 = 1000 3) Compute 3ab(a + b): 3ab(a + b) = 3 * 24 * 10 = 720 4) Subtract: a^3 + b^3 = 1000 − 720 = 280 Verification / Alternative check: Optional check by solving: a and b would be roots of t^2 − 10t + 24 = 0. This factors as (t − 6)(t − 4) = 0, so a and b are 6 and 4 in some order. Then a^3 + b^3 = 6^3 + 4^3 = 216 + 64 = 280, matching the identity-based result exactly. This confirms the computation is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • 152 and 140: usually come from subtracting 3ab only (72) instead of 3ab(a + b) (720). • 72: equals 3ab, not a^3 + b^3. • 328: indicates an arithmetic error in 10^3 or in 3*24*10. Common Pitfalls: • Using a^3 + b^3 = (a + b)^3 − 3ab (missing the factor (a + b)). • Computing 10^3 incorrectly or mis-multiplying 3*24*10. • Trying to find a and b first and making factoring mistakes, even though it is not needed. Final Answer: 280

Question 14

In trigonometry, find the exact value of the expression cot 60° minus sec 45°.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests basic trigonometric values of standard angles and the ability to combine them into a single exact expression. Rather than approximating the trigonometric ratios numerically, the goal is to manipulate them in radical form and match the result with one of the given options. Such questions are common in aptitude and competitive exams where quick recall of standard angle values like 30°, 45° and 60° is essential. Given Data / Assumptions: We need to evaluate cot 60° − sec 45° exactly. Standard angle values are used: 60° and 45°. Angles are in degrees and lie in the first quadrant, so all trigonometric ratios are positive. Concept / Approach: The main ideas are: Use standard trigonometric values: tan 60°, cos 45° and their reciprocals. Recall that cot θ = 1 / tan θ and sec θ = 1 / cos θ. Express both terms in radical form and then combine them into a single simplified expression. Optionally, rationalise or rearrange to match one of the answer choices. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that tan 60° = √3, so cot 60° = 1 / tan 60° = 1 / √3 = √3 / 3. Step 2: Recall that cos 45° = √2 / 2, so sec 45° = 1 / cos 45° = 1 / (√2 / 2) = 2 / √2 = √2. Step 3: Substitute these into the expression: cot 60° − sec 45° = (√3 / 3) − √2. Step 4: To compare with options, write this over a common denominator of 3: (√3 / 3) − √2 = (√3 / 3) − (3√2 / 3). Step 5: Combine the numerators: (√3 − 3√2) / 3. Step 6: Therefore the exact value is (√3 − 3√2) / 3. Verification / Alternative check: Step 1: Use approximate values √2 ≈ 1.414 and √3 ≈ 1.732. Step 2: Compute cot 60° ≈ 0.577 and sec 45° ≈ 1.414, so cot 60° − sec 45° ≈ 0.577 − 1.414 ≈ −0.837. Step 3: Evaluate (√3 − 3√2) / 3 numerically: numerator ≈ 1.732 − 4.242 = −2.510; divide by 3 gives ≈ −0.837, which agrees with the direct calculation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option (√2 - √3)/√6 is roughly −0.13, which does not match the approximate value −0.84. Option (1 - 2√2)/2 is approximately −0.91, again not equal to −0.84. Option (1 - √3)/2 is about −0.37, which is far from the correct value. Option (3√2 - √3)/3 is the negative of the correct numerator sign pattern and is positive, not negative. Common Pitfalls: One common mistake is misremembering cot 60° as √3 instead of 1 / √3. Another error is to use sec 45° = 1 / (1 / √2) incorrectly and leave it as 2 / √2 without simplifying to √2. Students sometimes try to compare options numerically without first simplifying, which can take longer and lead to rounding errors. Final Answer: The exact value of cot 60° − sec 45° is (√3 - 3√2)/3.

Question 15

If cot θ = 24/7 for an acute angle θ in trigonometry, what is the exact value of sin θ?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem checks your understanding of basic trigonometric ratios in a right angled triangle, especially how to move between cot θ and sin θ. Questions like this appear frequently in aptitude tests because they combine ratio interpretation, Pythagoras theorem and the definition of the trigonometric functions. Given Data / Assumptions: cot θ = 24/7 for an acute angle θ. θ lies in the first quadrant, so all trigonometric ratios are positive. We are asked to determine sin θ. Concept / Approach: The key concepts are: cot θ is defined as adjacent side divided by opposite side in a right triangle. sin θ is defined as opposite side divided by hypotenuse. We can assume a right triangle with sides proportional to the given ratio, then apply Pythagoras theorem to find the hypotenuse and finally compute sin θ. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: From cot θ = 24/7, interpret this as adjacent side = 24k and opposite side = 7k for some positive scale factor k. Step 2: Use Pythagoras theorem to find the hypotenuse h: h^2 = (24k)^2 + (7k)^2 = 576k^2 + 49k^2 = 625k^2. Step 3: Therefore h = √(625k^2) = 25k. Step 4: By definition, sin θ = opposite / hypotenuse = 7k / 25k. Step 5: Simplify the ratio: sin θ = 7/25. Verification / Alternative check: Step 1: Once the sides are 7k, 24k and 25k, notice that this is a scaled 7-24-25 Pythagorean triple, which is a standard right triangle. Step 2: Compute cot θ again from these sides: cot θ = adjacent / opposite = 24k / 7k = 24/7, which matches the given value. Step 3: This confirms that our interpretation of the triangle and the resulting sin θ value of 7/25 is consistent. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option 24/25 corresponds to adjacent / hypotenuse, which is cos θ, not sin θ. Option 8/25 does not relate to any side of the 7-24-25 triangle and is arbitrary. Option 9/25 also does not match any correct ratio derived from the triangle. Option 25/24 is greater than 1, whereas the sine of an acute angle must always lie between 0 and 1. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to confuse cot θ with tan θ and invert the given ratio incorrectly. Some learners mistakenly treat 24 and 7 as hypotenuse and one leg rather than adjacent and opposite, which breaks the Pythagorean relationship. Another error is forgetting that trigonometric ratios for acute angles cannot exceed 1 in magnitude for sine and cosine. Final Answer: The required value of sin θ is 7/25.

Question 16

If θ is an acute angle and 4 sin²θ = 3, then what is the exact value of the expression (tan θ − cot θ) / 2?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question combines trigonometric identities with algebraic manipulation. You are given a condition on sin²θ and asked to evaluate a compound expression involving tan θ and cot θ. Such questions check conceptual clarity about basic identities and careful handling of square roots for acute angles. Given Data / Assumptions: 4 sin²θ = 3. θ is acute, so 0° < θ < 90° and all primary trigonometric ratios are positive. We need to find (tan θ − cot θ)/2. Concept / Approach: Key concepts: From 4 sin²θ = 3, we can find sin θ and then cos θ using sin²θ + cos²θ = 1. Once sin θ and cos θ are known, compute tan θ = sin θ / cos θ and cot θ = cos θ / sin θ. Simplify tan θ − cot θ and then divide by 2, making sure to keep everything in exact radical form. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: From 4 sin²θ = 3, divide both sides by 4 to get sin²θ = 3/4. Step 2: Since θ is acute, sin θ is positive, so sin θ = √(3/4) = √3 / 2. Step 3: Use sin²θ + cos²θ = 1 to find cos θ: cos²θ = 1 − 3/4 = 1/4, hence cos θ = 1/2 for an acute angle. Step 4: Compute tan θ = sin θ / cos θ = (√3 / 2) / (1/2) = √3. Step 5: Compute cot θ = cos θ / sin θ = (1/2) / (√3 / 2) = 1 / √3. Step 6: Now tan θ − cot θ = √3 − 1/√3 = (3 − 1)/√3 = 2/√3. Step 7: Finally, (tan θ − cot θ)/2 = (2/√3)/2 = 1/√3. Verification / Alternative check: Step 1: Notice that sin θ = √3 / 2 corresponds to θ = 60° in standard trigonometry. Step 2: At θ = 60°, tan θ = √3 and cot θ = 1 / √3, which matches our derived values. Step 3: Substitute θ = 60° directly into the target expression: (tan 60° − cot 60°)/2 = (√3 − 1/√3)/2 = (2/√3)/2 = 1/√3, confirming the result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option 1 corresponds to tan θ − cot θ = 2, which is not supported by the computed exact values. Option 0 would imply tan θ = cot θ, which cannot happen for this angle since their values are different. Option √3 is the value of tan θ alone, not the simplified expression asked in the problem. Option 2/√3 is the value of tan θ − cot θ before dividing by 2, so it is only an intermediate result, not the final answer. Common Pitfalls: Some learners forget that θ is acute and may take a negative square root for sin θ or cos θ. Another typical error is to stop at tan θ − cot θ without applying the final division by 2. Careless algebra with radicals, such as mishandling √3 − 1/√3, often leads to incorrect simplification. Final Answer: The exact value of (tan θ − cot θ)/2 is 1/√3.

Question 17

If the simple interest on ₹1 for a period of 1 month is 1 paisa, what is the corresponding annual rate of interest in percent per annum?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about simple interest, one of the most basic topics in arithmetic and banking mathematics. It connects the interest earned over a short period, namely one month, to the annual rate of interest. Understanding how to convert between periods is essential for handling savings, loans and investment problems in exams and in real life. Given Data / Assumptions: Principal P = ₹1. Time T = 1 month. Simple interest for this period is 1 paisa. 1 paisa = ₹0.01. We assume 1 year = 12 months and use the simple interest formula with T expressed in years. Concept / Approach: The simple interest formula is: Simple interest SI = (P * R * T) / 100, where R is the rate percent per annum and T is time in years. We know SI, P and T, and we need to solve for R. Convert 1 month into years as T = 1/12. Substitute values and rearrange to find R. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Convert the given interest into rupees: 1 paisa = ₹0.01, so SI = 0.01. Step 2: Principal P = 1 and time T = 1 month = 1/12 year. Step 3: Use the simple interest formula: SI = (P * R * T) / 100. Step 4: Substitute values: 0.01 = (1 * R * (1/12)) / 100. Step 5: Simplify the right side: (R * 1/12) / 100 = R / 1200. Step 6: So 0.01 = R / 1200, which implies R = 0.01 * 1200. Step 7: Compute R: 0.01 * 1200 = 12. Step 8: Therefore the rate of interest is 12% per annum. Verification / Alternative check: Step 1: Assume R = 12% per annum and recompute SI for T = 1/12 year and P = 1. Step 2: SI = (1 * 12 * 1/12) / 100 = (12/12) / 100 = 1/100 = 0.01. Step 3: This matches the given simple interest of ₹0.01 (1 paisa), confirming the calculation is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option 10% would give SI = (1 * 10 * 1/12) / 100 = 10/1200 ≈ 0.0083, which is less than 0.01. Option 8% gives SI = (1 * 8 * 1/12) / 100 ≈ 0.0067, still smaller than required. Option 6% yields an even smaller interest, around 0.005, not equal to 1 paisa. Option 15% produces SI ≈ 0.0125, which is larger than the given 0.01. Common Pitfalls: One common mistake is to treat 1 month as 1 year, which leads to a huge error in the rate. Another error is mis-converting paisa to rupees, such as taking 1 paisa as 0.1 rupee instead of 0.01 rupee. Some students forget to divide by 100 in the simple interest formula or misplace decimal points while solving for R. Final Answer: The rate of interest per annum is 12%.

Question 18

If p = 99, what is the exact numerical value of the algebraic expression p(p² + 3p + 3)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem involves evaluating a polynomial expression at a specific integer value. It looks straightforward but is also related to algebraic identities used in shortcuts, especially when p is chosen close to 100. Recognising patterns can help in mental calculation and speed improvement for competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: p = 99. We need to compute p(p² + 3p + 3). All operations are basic integer arithmetic. Concept / Approach: Possible approaches: Direct substitution: plug p = 99 into the expression and compute step by step. Use algebraic expansion: p(p² + 3p + 3) = p³ + 3p² + 3p and then substitute p = 99. Notice that the result is very close to 10^6 since 99 is close to 100, which helps in checking plausibility. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Start with the expression E = p(p² + 3p + 3). Step 2: Substitute p = 99 into the expression. Step 3: First compute p²: 99² = 9801. Step 4: Compute 3p: 3 × 99 = 297. Step 5: Evaluate the bracket: p² + 3p + 3 = 9801 + 297 + 3 = 10101. Step 6: Now E = p × 10101 = 99 × 10101. Step 7: Compute 10101 × 100 = 1010100, then subtract one group of 10101 to get 1010100 − 10101 = 999999. Step 8: Therefore the exact value of the expression is 999999. Verification / Alternative check: Step 1: Expand algebraically: p(p² + 3p + 3) = p³ + 3p² + 3p. Step 2: Substitute p = 99: p³ = 99³ = (100 − 1)³ = 1000000 − 3(10000) + 3(100) − 1 = 1000000 − 30000 + 300 − 1 = 970299. Step 3: Compute 3p²: 3 × 9801 = 29403. Step 4: Compute 3p: 3 × 99 = 297. Step 5: Add these: 970299 + 29403 + 297 = 999999, which matches the earlier result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option 1000000 is slightly larger than the correct value; it might result from mistakenly assuming p³ is exactly 10^6 when p is 100. Option 1000001 is even larger and does not match any careful calculation. Option 999998 is one less than the correct result and could come from a subtraction error during multiplication. Option 1000002 is not supported by any exact arithmetic from the expression. Common Pitfalls: Students may miscalculate 99² or 99³ due to rushing, especially with large numbers. Another mistake is to approximate 99 as 100 without adjusting the expression correctly, which leads to rough rather than exact values. Carrying errors while subtracting or adding intermediate values can also change the final answer by 1 or 2 units. Final Answer: The value of p(p² + 3p + 3) for p = 99 is 999999.

Question 19

If a − b = 1 and a³ − b³ = 61 for two real numbers a and b, what is the exact value of the product ab?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem uses standard algebraic identities involving cubes and differences of numbers. By combining the identity for a³ − b³ with the given difference a − b, we can find the product ab without solving a full quadratic. Such questions test your familiarity with identities and your ability to manipulate them efficiently. Given Data / Assumptions: a − b = 1. a³ − b³ = 61. a and b are real numbers. We are required to find ab. Concept / Approach: Key ideas: Use the identity a³ − b³ = (a − b)(a² + ab + b²). Use the identity (a − b)² = a² + b² − 2ab to connect a² + b² with ab. First find a² + ab + b² from the cubic identity, then express a² + b² in terms of ab using the squared difference and finally solve for ab. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Apply the identity a³ − b³ = (a − b)(a² + ab + b²). Step 2: Substitute the known values: 61 = (a − b)(a² + ab + b²) = 1 × (a² + ab + b²). Step 3: So a² + ab + b² = 61. Step 4: Now use (a − b)² = a² + b² − 2ab. Since a − b = 1, we have 1² = a² + b² − 2ab, so a² + b² = 1 + 2ab. Step 5: Substitute this into a² + ab + b² = 61 to get (1 + 2ab) + ab = 61. Step 6: Combine like terms: 1 + 3ab = 61. Step 7: Rearrange to find ab: 3ab = 60, hence ab = 60 / 3 = 20. Verification / Alternative check: Step 1: Once ab = 20 is found, we can construct the quadratic whose roots are a and b with sum a + b and product ab, although the exact roots are not necessary. Step 2: From a − b = 1 and ab = 20, one can solve for a and b explicitly and then compute a³ − b³ numerically to confirm that it equals 61. Step 3: This backwards check, while more tedious, would verify the consistency of the result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option −20 would give a² + b² = 1 + 2(−20) = −39, which is not compatible with a² + ab + b² = 61. Option 30 would lead to a² + b² = 1 + 60 = 61, making a² + ab + b² = 61 + 30 = 91, not 61. Option 60 gives a² + b² = 121 and then a² + ab + b² = 181, again contradicting the given cubic equation value. Option 10 similarly fails to satisfy the identity when substituted back. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to try to expand a³ − b³ directly without using the identity, which becomes messy. Some students incorrectly apply the square or cube identities or mix up a³ + b³ with a³ − b³. Forgetting the relationship between a² + b² and ab via (a − b)² leads to unnecessary algebra or incorrect assumptions. Final Answer: The value of the product ab is 20.

Question 20

Find the exact value of the trigonometric expression sec²17° − 1/(tan²73°) − sin 17° · sec 73°.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is designed to test your ability to use complementary angle relationships and basic trigonometric identities. The angles 17° and 73° add up to 90°, so they are complementary. Recognising this helps simplify the expression without resorting to calculator approximations. Given Data / Assumptions: Expression: sec²17° − 1/(tan²73°) − sin 17° · sec 73°. Angles 17° and 73° satisfy 17° + 73° = 90°. Trigonometric functions are in degrees and lie in a standard context where identities apply. Concept / Approach: Key concepts: Complementary angle identities: tan(90° − θ) = cot θ and sec(90° − θ) = cosec θ. Pythagorean identities: sec²θ = 1 + tan²θ and 1 + cot²θ = cosec²θ. Use angle transformations to rewrite tan 73° and sec 73° in terms of 17°, then simplify step by step. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Use complement relation: 73° = 90° − 17°. Step 2: Then tan 73° = tan(90° − 17°) = cot 17°. Step 3: So tan²73° = cot²17° and 1 / tan²73° = 1 / cot²17° = tan²17°. Step 4: Also, sec 73° = sec(90° − 17°) = cosec 17°. Step 5: Therefore sin 17° · sec 73° = sin 17° · cosec 17° = 1. Step 6: Rewrite the expression in terms of 17° only: sec²17° − tan²17° − 1. Step 7: Use identity sec²θ = 1 + tan²θ, so sec²17° − tan²17° = 1. Step 8: Thus the expression becomes 1 − 1 = 0. Verification / Alternative check: Step 1: One can approximate numerically: pick approximate values of tan 17°, sec 17°, sin 17° and tan 73°, sec 73° from tables or a calculator. Step 2: Compute each term and observe that sec²17° − 1/(tan²73°) is close to 1, while sin 17° · sec 73° is very close to 1. Step 3: Their difference is then extremely close to 0, confirming the exact symbolic simplification. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option 1 would require sec²17° − tan²17° − 1 to simplify to 1, but we showed it simplifies to 0. Option −1 would imply sec²17° − tan²17° equals 0, contradicting the identity sec²θ = 1 + tan²θ. Option 2 or −2 would arise only if the identity or complementary relations were misapplied, which is not correct here. Therefore 0 is the only consistent result. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes forget or misapply complementary angle formulas, for example confusing tan(90° − θ) with tan θ. Another error is to treat sec 73° incorrectly as 1 / sin 17° instead of 1 / cos 73°, which then simplifies to cosec 17°. Some learners try to approximate numerically early, which is slower and prone to rounding errors compared to using exact identities. Final Answer: The exact value of the expression is 0.

Simplification Questions