Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Only conclusion I follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
From a dependency statement, we can infer supportive policy actions that would strengthen the dependency pillar, but we should avoid extreme exclusivity claims. The statement says India’s economy depends mainly on forests, not solely. We test I) Trees should be preserved to improve India’s economy. II) India wants only maintenance of forests to improve economic conditions.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Conclusion I is a reasonable policy inference: preserving a principal resource aids the dependent economy. Conclusion II is an “only” claim that excludes other economic levers—trade, services, industry, agriculture—which is far stronger than the premise allows.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Final Answer:
Only conclusion I follows
Discussion & Comments