Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only II
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:We must identify a statement that is certainly true given four proportions. Without overlap data, only deductions forced by the Pigeonhole Principle or obvious subset relations can be made.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Check each claim for inevitability considering maximum/minimum overlaps.
Step-by-Step Solution:
• I (All house-owners are literate): Could be false; at most 1/3 literate but 1/2 own houses, so not all house-owners can be literate.• II (Some under 25 are literate): Under-25 are 4/5; literate are 1/3. Even if all 1/3 literate were among the 4/5 under 25, this is consistent and guarantees at least some literate are under 25. It is impossible to place all literate in the 1/5 above 25 because literate (1/3) > above-25 (1/5). Hence II is certainly true.• III (A quarter of house-owners cultivate paddy): Not forced; overlaps could vary.• IV (Half of paddy cultivators are literate): Not forced; overlaps could vary.Verification / Alternative check:Use extreme-case overlap to test certainty; only II survives all placements.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:They assert specific overlaps not guaranteed by totals.
Common Pitfalls:Assuming proportional overlap without justification.
Final Answer:Only II.
Discussion & Comments