Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Only conclusion II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Marketing statements often combine reputation with a performance promise. Here, Company X claims such quality that users “do not spoil even a single shot” regardless of weather. We must test two conclusions: I) No other company is reputed in cameras except X. II) Anyone can take an acceptable shot with camera X.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Conclusion I requires a comparative, market-wide assertion that the statement never makes. Conclusion II mirrors the advertised promise: if you “do not spoil even a single shot,” that implies any normal user can get an acceptable result.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assess I: The text praises X but says nothing about competitors—so I does not follow.Assess II: The core message is user-level reliability, independent of weather. That maps to “anyone can take an acceptable shot with camera X.” Thus II follows as the intended implication of the ad.Verification / Alternative check:
If II were false, the promise “do not spoil even a single shot” would be misleading. The reasonable exam inference is that such an explicit performance assurance is meant to be taken at face value.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
A and E: Include I, which is unsupported.C: “Either” is wrong because only II follows.D: Rejects II despite the clear performance claim.Common Pitfalls:
Assuming superlatives (only X is reputed) when the text merely asserts quality for X.Final Answer:Only conclusion II follows
Discussion & Comments