Advertisement Logic – What can be concluded from a quality claim? Statement: Company X has a record of manufacturing cameras with high quality and the latest design so that you do not spoil even a single shot irrespective of weather conditions.

Introduction / Context:
Marketing statements often combine reputation with a performance promise. Here, Company X claims such quality that users “do not spoil even a single shot” regardless of weather. We must test two conclusions: I) No other company is reputed in cameras except X. II) Anyone can take an acceptable shot with camera X.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Company X claims a strong track record and robust performance in all weather.
• No comparison with other brands’ reputations is provided.
• The performance claim is framed as universal for users.

Concept / Approach:
Conclusion I requires a comparative, market-wide assertion that the statement never makes. Conclusion II mirrors the advertised promise: if you “do not spoil even a single shot,” that implies any normal user can get an acceptable result.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:

Final Answer:
Only conclusion II follows