Difficulty: Hard
Correct Answer: None of these
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This is a logical relations problem. “Whenever milk is kept in front of a child, the child cries” (I) indicates milk-in-front is a sufficient condition for crying. Statement II links hunger to crying (hunger ⇒ crying). Statement III links unhappiness to hunger (unhappy ⇒ hungry ⇒ crying). We must test each conclusion against these implications.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Translate to implications and test converses (which are generally invalid): from A ⇒ B we cannot infer B ⇒ A. None of the conclusions should introduce unstated converses/generalizations.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Draw implication chain and confirm no converse or added modality sneaks in.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They assume converses or add preferences/modalities not in premises.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming crying implies unhappy; mixing up necessity/sufficiency.
Final Answer:
None of these.
Discussion & Comments