Decision-making – Courses of Action for cyber incidents Statement: There has been a large number of internet hacking cases in recent months, creating panic among internet users. Courses of Action: I. Government machinery should make an all-out effort to nab those responsible and put them behind bars. II. Internet users should be advised to stay away from using the internet until the culprits are caught.
-
AOnly I follows
-
BOnly II follows
-
CEither I or II follows
-
DNeither I nor II follows
-
EBoth I and II follow
Answer
Correct Answer: Only I follows
Explanation
Introduction / Context:This scenario addresses cybersecurity governance. A spike in hacking incidents requires proportionate legal and technical responses while maintaining essential digital services.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Hacking incidents are numerous and recent.
- Users are panicked; service disruption would be costly.
- Government has investigative and prosecutorial tools.
Concept / Approach:Sound courses of action should mitigate risk, pursue offenders, and preserve continuity. A blanket cessation of internet use is impractical and harmful to commerce, learning, and governance.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assess I: Strengthening investigation, coordination with CERT/LEAs, and prosecuting perpetrators addresses the root cause and deterrence. I follows.Assess II: Advising users to avoid the internet entirely is unrealistic and disproportionate. Better guidance would be hygiene measures (patching, MFA, secure backups) rather than total avoidance. II does not follow.Verification / Alternative check:Modern economies cannot pause online activity. Targeted countermeasures and public advisories on best practices are the norm, not abstention.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- Only II / Either / Both: Overbroad or contradictory to societal dependence on the internet.
- Neither: Ignores the need for enforcement.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing user caution with service shutdown; neglecting layered defense and legal deterrence.
Final Answer:Only I follows