Decision-making – Courses of Action for cyber incidents Statement: There has been a large number of internet hacking cases in recent months, creating panic among internet users. Courses of Action: I. Government machinery should make an all-out effort to nab those responsible and put them behind bars. II. Internet users should be advised to stay away from using the internet until the culprits are caught.

Introduction / Context:This scenario addresses cybersecurity governance. A spike in hacking incidents requires proportionate legal and technical responses while maintaining essential digital services.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Hacking incidents are numerous and recent.
• Users are panicked; service disruption would be costly.
• Government has investigative and prosecutorial tools.

Concept / Approach:Sound courses of action should mitigate risk, pursue offenders, and preserve continuity. A blanket cessation of internet use is impractical and harmful to commerce, learning, and governance.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:Modern economies cannot pause online activity. Targeted countermeasures and public advisories on best practices are the norm, not abstention.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Only II / Either / Both: Overbroad or contradictory to societal dependence on the internet.
• Neither: Ignores the need for enforcement.

Common Pitfalls:Confusing user caution with service shutdown; neglecting layered defense and legal deterrence.

Final Answer:Only I follows