Decision-making – Sports performance review Statement: India’s performance in the recent Olympic Games was very poor; not even a single medal was won. The Government spent Rs 5 crores on training and deputing a team to participate. Courses of Action: I. India should stop sending players to future Olympic Games. II. Government should immediately set up an enquiry commission to find out the reasons for the dismal performance.

Introduction / Context:
This question examines rational policy response to poor sports outcomes. The issue is whether to disengage from competition or diagnose and improve performance systems.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• No medals at the Olympics.
• Rs 5 crores already spent on preparation and participation.
• Long-term national interest includes athlete development and international representation.

Concept / Approach:
Evidence-based improvement requires assessing training pipelines, coaching quality, selection, sports science support, and competition exposure. Withdrawing from future events does not solve systemic issues and harms athletes and national standing.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Successful sports programs iterate on data-driven reviews post-competition. Many nations improve through structured evaluation rather than withdrawal.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• I follows / Either / Both: I is counterproductive and not a solution.
• Neither: Ignores the need for learning and reform.

Common Pitfalls:
Letting short-term disappointment dictate strategic disengagement; overlooking the value of diagnostics and continuous improvement.

Final Answer:
Only II follows