Decision-making – Community security response Statement: Alert villagers caught a group of dreaded dacoits armed with deadly weapons. Courses of Action: I. The villagers should be provided sophisticated weapons. II. The villagers should be rewarded for their courage and unity.

Introduction / Context:
This scenario concerns local security and appropriate state response to civilian bravery. The key is to endorse safe, lawful measures without escalating risks.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Civilians apprehended armed criminals.
• Public safety and rule of law are priorities.
• State has professional police forces trained to handle armed threats.

Concept / Approach:
Arming civilians with “sophisticated weapons” can increase accidental harm, vigilantism, and legal complications. Rewarding civic courage and reinforcing cooperation with law enforcement is appropriate and encourages community policing through information and vigilance, not combat.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Best practice is to equip police, not civilians, while building community intelligence networks and emergency communication channels. Rewards and public appreciation fit this model.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• I follows / Either / Both: I is risky and inappropriate as a general policy.
• Neither: Ignores positive reinforcement of safe civic action.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming arming civilians increases safety; overlooking professional law enforcement’s role.

Final Answer:
Only II follows