Educational exclusion in tribal areas — selecting effective actions Statement: People in some tribal areas are far from education. Courses of Action: (I) Government support to NGOs to open schools. (II) Launch a mass awareness programme. (III) Entrust social workers with the job of educating residents.
Verbal Reasoning
Course of Action
Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
-
AOnly I and II follow
-
BOnly II and III follow
-
COnly I and III follow
-
DOnly either I or III, and II follow
-
EAll follow
Answer
Correct Answer: All follow
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Educational access gaps in remote tribal regions stem from infrastructure deficits, low awareness, and cultural or linguistic barriers. The problem statement invites practical, complementary actions spanning supply (schools), demand (awareness), and community engagement (social work).
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Lack of education access is substantial.
- NGOs can operate schools with government support.
- Awareness influences enrollment and retention.
- Social workers can bridge trust, language, and inclusion gaps.
Concept / Approach:
- A multi-pronged strategy is generally required: expand service points, motivate participation, and provide community-based support.
- Actions I, II, and III are not mutually exclusive and reinforce each other.
Step-by-Step Solution:
I follows: Government-NGO partnerships can speed school setup where state capacity is thin.II follows: Mass awareness (benefits of schooling, scholarships, midday meals) raises demand.III follows: Social workers mentor families, address dropout causes, and support remedial learning.Verification / Alternative check:
Empirical programs show best outcomes when infrastructure, outreach, and community facilitation co-exist.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any subset omits an essential dimension (supply, demand, or facilitation).Common Pitfalls:
Expecting a single intervention to solve entrenched, multidimensional access problems.Final Answer:
All follow