Statement — Despite increasing BPO jobs in the country, a large number of educated youth remain unemployed.\nCourses of Action:\nI. The Government should give unemployment allowance to all unemployed youth.\nII. The Government should introduce schemes in different areas that generate employment opportunities.\nIII. Society and Government should encourage youth to pursue vocational education.

Introduction / Context:
Course-of-Action questions evaluate which responses are practical, forward-looking, and address root causes without creating perverse incentives. Here, unemployment persists despite growth in a specific sector (BPO), indicating a skills–jobs mismatch and limited sectoral absorption.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Fact: Many educated youth remain unemployed despite increasing BPO jobs.
• COA I: Pay unemployment allowance to all unemployed youth.
• COA II: Introduce diverse employment-generating schemes.
• COA III: Encourage vocational education (skills aligned to market needs).

Concept / Approach:
Sound courses of action are feasible, non-myopic, and target employability and job creation. Direct universal allowances (I) may be fiscally heavy and risk dependency; they do not solve employability or demand creation. Measures that expand opportunities (II) and upgrade skills (III) address structural issues.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Analyze I: Universal allowance is a relief measure, not a solution; it can strain budgets and disincentivize job search; therefore generally not a preferred immediate action.2) Analyze II: Sector-diversified schemes (MSMEs, infrastructure, services) directly create jobs → follows.3) Analyze III: Vocational pathways reduce mismatch and improve employability → follows.

Verification / Alternative check:
Evidence worldwide shows combining demand-side programs with supply-side skill development is effective in reducing frictional and structural unemployment.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Options including I endorse a blanket dole that does not fix the cause. “Only II” ignores the complementary role of skilling; “Only III” ignores the need to generate vacancies.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating relief with reform. Sustainable employment needs both job creation and relevant skills.

Final Answer:
Both II and III follow.