Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only I and III follow
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The statement contests the contribution of nuclear power to national security. From this, we must infer reasonable, proportionate actions—ones that align with the premise without leaping to extreme, unsafe conclusions.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Step-by-Step Solution:
Accept I: The premise questions the payoff of further investment for security aims.Reject II: Destruction of capability is neither implied nor prudent.Accept III: Diplomacy is a sensible alternative lever for security benefits.Verification / Alternative check:
Policy analysis typically revisits marginal investments when claimed benefits are doubtful, and elevates alternative instruments such as diplomacy.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only I or Only III: Misses the complementary nature of the two accepted steps.II only or including II: Embraces an extreme not warranted by the premise.Common Pitfalls:
Confusing “does not enhance security” with “must be abolished.”Final Answer:
Only I and III follow
Discussion & Comments