College seat shortage after school leaving — pick feasible remedies Statement: Each year, thousands of eligible students fail to secure college admission in both urban and rural areas. Courses of Action: (I) Set up more colleges in both urban and rural areas. (II) Reduce the number of schools. (III) Offer more vocational courses in schools so students can take up vocations after school.

Introduction / Context:When demand for college seats far exceeds supply, two rational levers exist: expand higher-education capacity and diversify post-school pathways so college is not the only route to employment.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Eligible students are denied admission due to capacity constraints.
• Course I: Build more colleges to increase seats.
• Course II: Reduce schools, which would arbitrarily shrink the pipeline.
• Course III: Strengthen vocational options to create employability after school.

Concept / Approach:

• Supply-side expansion (I) directly addresses the seat gap.
• Pathway diversification (III) eases pressure on college seats and improves outcomes.
• Reducing schools (II) is regressive and unrelated to capacity mismatch at the tertiary level.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:

Final Answer: