Statement — Lack of coordination between the university, its colleges, and various authorities has resulted in students migrating from one college to another seeking admission. Courses of Action: I. If a student migrates from a college, the information should be sent to all other colleges of the university. II. Admissions to all the colleges of the university should be handled directly by the university. III. A separate section should be created to take strict action against students indulging in anti-social activities.

Introduction / Context:
The problem cites coordination failure among the university, affiliated colleges, and authorities, causing frequent student migration. Effective courses of action should improve information flow and governance where admissions decisions occur.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Coordination issues are the proximate cause of migration.
• I: Notify all colleges when a student migrates to prevent duplicate or irregular admissions.
• II: Centralize admissions under the university to standardize rules and reduce conflicts.
• III: Create a section to punish anti-social students.

Concept / Approach:
Actions should directly address the stated cause—coordination. Information-sharing (I) reduces fraud/overlaps; centralization (II) streamlines processes. Item III targets a different issue (student misconduct) and does not solve inter-institutional coordination.

Step-by-Step Solution:
I follows: real-time notifications and shared databases ensure transparent seat status and prevent multiple enrollments.II follows: centralized admissions or a common portal enforces uniform criteria and audit trails, improving coordination.III does not follow: it addresses discipline, not the admissions-coordination problem identified.

Verification / Alternative check:
Many universities implement centralized online admissions and migration portals precisely to tackle such coordination failures.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only I/Only II: partial fixes. Only III/None: ignore the root cause. Therefore, I and II together are appropriate.

Common Pitfalls:
Proposing punitive measures for unrelated issues; ensure actions map to the cause described.

Final Answer:
Both I and II follow.