Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Both I and II follow
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Material irregularities in accounts call for both diagnostic review and accountability. The proposed actions are (I) appoint an efficient audit team to check accounts and (II) issue show-cause notices to employees involved in the irregularity. We must determine whether each logically follows.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Step-by-Step Solution:
Action I (audit) is essential to verify and document the blunders, trace entries, and recommend control fixes.Action II (show-cause) is appropriate if specific employees appear linked to irregularities; it preserves natural justice.Both actions therefore follow logically and complement each other.Verification / Alternative check:
Standard corporate governance uses audits plus disciplinary procedures; this aligns with best practices.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only I or Only II: Each alone is incomplete either factually (no audit) or procedurally (no accountability step).Either / Neither: Not consistent with the seriousness of the issue.Common Pitfalls:
Jumping to punishment without facts or ignoring accountability after confirmation. Both must proceed.Final Answer:
Both I and II follow
Discussion & Comments