Corporate control — Accounting blunders in a factory: what should be done? Statement: Serious blunders have been detected in the Accounts section of a factory. Which courses of action follow logically?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Both I and II follow

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Material irregularities in accounts call for both diagnostic review and accountability. The proposed actions are (I) appoint an efficient audit team to check accounts and (II) issue show-cause notices to employees involved in the irregularity. We must determine whether each logically follows.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Serious accounting blunders exist.
  • Cause, scope, and intent (error vs. fraud) are not yet fully known.
  • Due process and internal controls are valued.


Concept / Approach:

  • An independent audit establishes facts, quantifies impact, and identifies control failures.
  • Show-cause notices initiate fair disciplinary processes, allowing responses before any sanctions.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Action I (audit) is essential to verify and document the blunders, trace entries, and recommend control fixes.Action II (show-cause) is appropriate if specific employees appear linked to irregularities; it preserves natural justice.Both actions therefore follow logically and complement each other.


Verification / Alternative check:

Standard corporate governance uses audits plus disciplinary procedures; this aligns with best practices.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Only I or Only II: Each alone is incomplete either factually (no audit) or procedurally (no accountability step).Either / Neither: Not consistent with the seriousness of the issue.


Common Pitfalls:

Jumping to punishment without facts or ignoring accountability after confirmation. Both must proceed.


Final Answer:

Both I and II follow

More Questions from Course of Action

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion