Statement–Assumption — “Even after retirement from international cricket, the ‘Rawalpindi Express’ is in controversy again; this time he targeted Sachin Tendulkar through his book ‘Controversially Yours’.” — about Shoaib Akhtar Assumptions: I) Shoaib Akhtar does not play Test cricket now. II) One can target anybody through one’s writing. Choose the implicit assumption(s).

Verbal Reasoning Statement and Assumption Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
Answer

Correct Answer: If only Assumption I is implicit

Explanation

Introduction / Context:The statement explicitly says he retired from international cricket and then mentions a controversy arising from his book’s remarks on Sachin Tendulkar.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • “Retirement from international cricket” entails no participation in Tests/ODIs/T20Is.
  • Books can criticise public figures.

Concept / Approach:Assumption I is entailed by “retirement from international cricket,” which includes Test cricket. Assumption II (“can target anybody”) is an overgeneralization not required for the statement—what matters is that he did write critical remarks; the possibility in general about “anybody” is unnecessary.

Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Map “retirement from international cricket” → not playing Tests (I).2) Reject II as an over-broad principle beyond the statement’s needs.

Verification / Alternative check:Retirement from international play normally covers all formats.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:“Only II/Both/Neither” either overreach or deny the clear implication of retirement.

Common Pitfalls:Confusing specific critical remarks with a universal licence to target “anybody.”

Final Answer:Only Assumption I is implicit.

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion