Statement–Assumption — “Even after retirement from international cricket, the ‘Rawalpindi Express’ is in controversy again; this time he targeted Sachin Tendulkar through his book ‘Controversially Yours’.” — about Shoaib Akhtar Assumptions: I) Shoaib Akhtar does not play Test cricket now. II) One can target anybody through one’s writing. Choose the implicit assumption(s).

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: If only Assumption I is implicit

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The statement explicitly says he retired from international cricket and then mentions a controversy arising from his book’s remarks on Sachin Tendulkar.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • “Retirement from international cricket” entails no participation in Tests/ODIs/T20Is.
  • Books can criticise public figures.


Concept / Approach:
Assumption I is entailed by “retirement from international cricket,” which includes Test cricket. Assumption II (“can target anybody”) is an overgeneralization not required for the statement—what matters is that he did write critical remarks; the possibility in general about “anybody” is unnecessary.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Map “retirement from international cricket” → not playing Tests (I).2) Reject II as an over-broad principle beyond the statement’s needs.


Verification / Alternative check:
Retirement from international play normally covers all formats.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Only II/Both/Neither” either overreach or deny the clear implication of retirement.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing specific critical remarks with a universal licence to target “anybody.”


Final Answer:
Only Assumption I is implicit.

More Questions from Statement and Assumption

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion