Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: If only Assumption II is implicit
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The proposal recommends incentives as a lever to raise performance. For such a recommendation to be rational, one must at least believe that performance is improvable and responsive to interventions.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Assumption II is necessary; without the belief that performance can be improved, incentives would be pointless. Assumption I directly contradicts the idea of announcing incentives (if they “do not work,” why announce them?) and is therefore not implicit.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
If management thought improvement was impossible, it would likely focus on monitoring or restructuring rather than rewards.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Choosing I (or either) undermines the rationale for incentives; “neither” ignores the improvement premise.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming the statement must also contain a view on long-run persistence; it only proposes launching incentives now.
Final Answer:
Only Assumption II is implicit.
Discussion & Comments