Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: If only Assumption II is implicit
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:A statement reports a sustained rise in air traffic. For such growth to be plausible across “past few years,” the ecosystem supporting demand must have broadened—especially affordability, access, and network expansion. A “status symbol” motive may exist for some travelers but is not essential to explain an aggregate, durable surge.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:An implicit assumption is a minimal belief necessary for the statement’s credibility. Widespread and persistent increase generally presumes that many more people can afford to fly (Assumption II). By contrast, calling air travel a “status symbol” (Assumption I) is neither necessary nor even consistent across traveler types (business, emergency, tourism). Status may influence a fraction of choices but cannot explain broad-based growth on its own.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Map macro trend (traffic growth) to enabling condition (expanded affordability).2) Evaluate I: not required; symbolic motives are incidental.3) Conclude II is the minimal, reasonable assumption.Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong:Picking I (or either) overstates an optional motive and misses the necessary enabling factor. Common Pitfalls:Confusing “some people’s motives” with structural drivers of mass trends. Final Answer:Only Assumption II is implicit.
Discussion & Comments