Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: if only Assumption I is implicit
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Appeals for voluntary conservation presume that at least a meaningful fraction of the audience will respond. Without such an expectation, issuing the appeal would be futile as a crisis-mitigation measure.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Assumption I is necessary: the civic body expects enough residents to comply for the measure to have aggregate impact. Assumption II about activists’ support is not required; the appeal can be justified regardless of activist involvement. Activist participation could help, but the decision to issue an appeal does not depend on presuming it.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Link the requested behavior change to expected compliance levels.2) Discard II as a nonessential auxiliary mechanism.Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong:Choosing II (or either/neither) misidentifies the minimal premise enabling the appeal to be effective. Common Pitfalls:Confusing helpful amplifiers (activists, media) with necessary assumptions. Final Answer:Only Assumption I is implicit.
Discussion & Comments