Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Assumption

Statement–Assumption — Notice at park entrance: “Pets are not allowed in the park premises.” Choose the implicit assumption.

Difficulty: Easy

At least some people who visit the park have pets
This is the only park which does not allow pets
People who ignored this notice were fined
There are more than one entrances to the park
None of these

Correct Answer: At least some people who visit the park have pets

Explanation:

Introduction / Context:Prohibitory notices are posted to regulate behavior that is plausible among intended users. If no visitors had pets or were ever likely to bring them, the notice would be pointless.

Given Data / Assumptions:

Text of the notice: a prohibition on pets within the park premises.
Purpose: prevent pet entry to maintain hygiene, safety, or wildlife protection.

Concept / Approach:The minimal assumption for such a notice to make sense is that some visitors do have pets and might bring them unless told otherwise. Claims about fines, uniqueness among parks, or number of entrances are not necessary to justify the presence of the notice.

Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Ask: what must be true for the sign to be a rational intervention?2) Answer: potential for pet-bearing visitors (option A).3) Evaluate B, C, D: none is required by or entailed in the wording.

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:Uniqueness (B) and fines (C) add extra facts; entrances (D) are irrelevant to the rule’s rationale.

Common Pitfalls:Confusing what might also be true (e.g., fines exist) with what must be assumed.

Statement–Assumption — Notice at park entrance: “Pets are not allowed in the park premises.” Choose the implicit assumption.

More Questions from Statement and Assumption

Discussion & Comments