Statement: Several schoolchildren have died recently in incidents attributed to poor maintenance of school buses. Courses of Action: I. Set up an expert group to inspect school buses and recommend safety measures. II. Suspend licences of all school buses until every bus is checked.

Verbal Reasoning Course of Action Difficulty: Medium
Choose an option
  • A
    Only I follows.
  • B
    Only II follows.
  • C
    Either I or II follows.
  • D
    Neither I nor II follows.
  • E
    Both I and II follow.

Answer

Correct Answer: Only I follows.

Explanation

Introduction / Context:Tragic incidents linked to maintenance failures demand rigorous inspection and enforcement, but measures must avoid paralysing essential school transport without a plan.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Deaths tied to bus maintenance lapses.
  • Large fleet across many schools.
  • Regulatory bodies can mandate checks.

Concept / Approach:I establishes expert-led inspections and standards (brakes, tyres, lights, emergency exits, driver vetting), leading to targeted actions. II’s blanket suspension, if immediate and universal, disrupts schooling and may be logistically impossible; instead, phased checks with immediate sidelining of failed vehicles is better.

Step-by-Step Solution:1) Create inspection protocol; prioritise older/high-mileage buses.2) Enforce “fail=off-road” until rectified; mandate maintenance logs.3) Train drivers/attendants; emergency drills for students.

Verification / Alternative check:Expert inspections improve safety swiftly; blanket suspensions backfire without alternative transport.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:II is excessive as phrased; proportional enforcement is preferred.

Common Pitfalls:Token checks; poor record-keeping.

Final Answer:Only I follows.

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion