Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
A widespread failure in a single paper suggests misalignment between teaching, assessment, and expected outcomes. Knee-jerk expulsions or resignations do not diagnose or solve the problem.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Appropriate actions (not in options) include paper audit, moderation, supplementary assessment, and faculty support/training. Both I and II are punitive without investigation and harm student/faculty welfare.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Convene academic committee to review the paper and grading rubric.2) Offer remediation and, where justified, re-evaluation or supplementary exams.3) Align teaching plan, tutorials, and assessment for next term.
Verification / Alternative check:
Academic reviews often correct anomalies and improve outcomes without destructive measures.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I expels students indiscriminately; II penalises faculty without evidence.
Common Pitfalls:
Ignoring student feedback; failing to moderate assessments.
Final Answer:
Neither I nor II follows.
Discussion & Comments