Eight-bit DAC resolution claim: “An 8-bit D/A converter has a resolution of 0.125.” Evaluate the accuracy; state the correct resolution as a fraction and percentage of full scale.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Incorrect

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Resolution defines the smallest analog change a DAC can produce for a one-code increment, expressed as a fraction of full scale (FS) or as a percentage. Correctly calculating resolution is foundational in sizing converters for measurement and control applications.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • N = 8 bits.
  • Ideal DAC with 2^N discrete levels.
  • Resolution refers to 1 LSB relative to FS.


Concept / Approach:
For an N-bit DAC, the number of codes is 2^N. The LSB size, as a fraction of full scale, is 1 / (2^N). Thus, for N = 8, resolution = 1 / 256 ≈ 0.00390625 FS, which equals 0.390625%. The claim “0.125” (unitless) does not match any standard expression for 8-bit resolution; 0.125 corresponds to 1/8 or 12.5%, which would be the resolution of a 3-bit DAC (1/2^3).


Step-by-Step Solution:

Compute 2^8 = 256.Resolution = 1 / 256 ≈ 0.00390625 of FS.As a percentage: 0.00390625 * 100 = 0.390625% of FS.Compare to 0.125 (12.5%): mismatched by a factor of 32.


Verification / Alternative check:
General formula holds for all N: Resolution% = 100 / (2^N). For N = 3, this gives 12.5% (0.125), confirming that 0.125 aligns with 3-bit, not 8-bit resolution.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Correct: Would imply 8-bit steps of 12.5% FS—clearly incorrect.
  • Only true for 3-bit DACs: This is a helpful comparison but the stem claims 8-bit.
  • Ambiguous: Even without units, 0.125 as a fraction or decimal is not 1/256.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing number of levels (2^N) with number of steps (2^N − 1); forgetting to specify units (fraction vs percent) leading to misinterpretation.


Final Answer:
Incorrect

More Questions from Interfacing to the Analog World

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion