Eight-bit DAC resolution claim: “An 8-bit D/A converter has a resolution of 0.125.” Evaluate the accuracy; state the correct resolution as a fraction and percentage of full scale.
-
ACorrect
-
BIncorrect
-
COnly true for 3-bit DACs
-
DAmbiguous without units
Answer
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Resolution defines the smallest analog change a DAC can produce for a one-code increment, expressed as a fraction of full scale (FS) or as a percentage. Correctly calculating resolution is foundational in sizing converters for measurement and control applications.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- N = 8 bits.
- Ideal DAC with 2^N discrete levels.
- Resolution refers to 1 LSB relative to FS.
Concept / Approach:For an N-bit DAC, the number of codes is 2^N. The LSB size, as a fraction of full scale, is 1 / (2^N). Thus, for N = 8, resolution = 1 / 256 ≈ 0.00390625 FS, which equals 0.390625%. The claim “0.125” (unitless) does not match any standard expression for 8-bit resolution; 0.125 corresponds to 1/8 or 12.5%, which would be the resolution of a 3-bit DAC (1/2^3).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Compute 2^8 = 256.Resolution = 1 / 256 ≈ 0.00390625 of FS.As a percentage: 0.00390625 * 100 = 0.390625% of FS.Compare to 0.125 (12.5%): mismatched by a factor of 32.Verification / Alternative check:General formula holds for all N: Resolution% = 100 / (2^N). For N = 3, this gives 12.5% (0.125), confirming that 0.125 aligns with 3-bit, not 8-bit resolution.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- Correct: Would imply 8-bit steps of 12.5% FS—clearly incorrect.
- Only true for 3-bit DACs: This is a helpful comparison but the stem claims 8-bit.
- Ambiguous: Even without units, 0.125 as a fraction or decimal is not 1/256.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing number of levels (2^N) with number of steps (2^N − 1); forgetting to specify units (fraction vs percent) leading to misinterpretation.
Final Answer:Incorrect