“Glove” relates to the “Hand” it covers. Choose the option that preserves the wearable item → body part relation.

Introduction / Context:
Wearable–body analogies link an item of clothing to the body part it is designed to cover. Gloves are worn on the hands; socks are worn on the feet. The mapping should preserve the direction “wearable → body part,” not the reverse.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Glove → Hand is a direct wearable mapping.
• We seek a similar relation for another wearable.

Concept / Approach:
“Socks : Feet” mirrors the structure. The other choices misstate direction or type: “Neck : Collar” reverses wearable/body order; “Tie : Shirt” connects two garments; “Coat : Pocket” is garment → part of garment, not body part.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Fix direction: item worn → body part.2) Select the pair that maintains this mapping.3) Choose “Socks : Feet.”

Verification / Alternative check:
Everyday usage confirms the parallel (gloves on hands; socks on feet), preserving the exact relation type.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Neck : Collar: Reversed; collar is worn around neck.
• Tie : Shirt: Garment–garment relation, not garment–body.
• Coat : Pocket: Whole–part of garment, not body.

Common Pitfalls:
Overlooking directionality in analogies.

Final Answer:
Socks : Feet