Statement: “It is almost impossible to survive and prosper in this world without sacrificing ethics and morality.” Conclusions: I. The world appreciates some concepts but may not uphold them. II. The concepts of ethics and morality are not practicable in life. Which conclusion(s) logically follow(s)?
-
AIf only Conclusion I follows
-
BIf either Conclusion I or II follows
-
CIf neither Conclusion I nor II follows
-
DIf both Conclusions I and II follow
-
EIf only Conclusion II follows
Answer
Correct Answer: If only Conclusion II follows
Explanation
Introduction / Context:The statement asserts that survival and prosperity almost require sacrificing ethics and morality. This is a strong claim about practicality in the real world.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Ethical conduct is claimed to be incompatible with success in most cases.
- No information on whether “the world appreciates” ethics/morality.
Concept / Approach:From the practicability viewpoint, the statement virtually declares ethics/morality to be impracticable for those seeking survival and prosperity—hence II follows. Appreciation (I) is about attitudes/values of “the world,” which are not discussed.
Step-by-Step Solution:
• I: Introduces the world’s appreciation or lip service—unstated, so it does not follow.• II: Declares impracticability in life for achieving success (as per the statement) and hence follows.Verification / Alternative check:“Almost impossible … without sacrificing” equates to “practically not workable” under ordinary conditions.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:They either include I or exclude II despite the clear practical thrust of the premise.
Common Pitfalls:Reading moral commentary (approval/disapproval) into a claim about feasibility.
Final Answer:If only Conclusion II follows.