Home » Verbal Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Would the resumption of cricketing ties contribute to normalisation of Indo-Pak relation? Arguments: I. No, normalisation of Indo-Pak relation needs bipartite dialogue to sort out debatable problems. II. Yes, music , sports etc bring harmony among peoples and it is a well-known fact that sport will definitely help ensure normalization of relations.

if only argument I is strong.
if only argument II is strong.
If either I or II is strong.
if neither I nor II is strong; and

Correct Answer: if only argument II is strong.

Explanation:

International sporting events were originally conceived as a promoted of peace and harmony. Hence II is strong. I is not strong because it diverts the question form ''cricketing ties'' to ''bipartite dialogue.''.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should private Investors be allowed to invest in defence production? Arguments: I. Yes. We should stress on quality. If private investors are allowed to invest in defence production, a competition for good quality will arise among them. This will help us to harness our defence sector whit ammunitions of good quality. II. No. It will be better to keep our defence sector under veil, otherwise it will create threat to the integrity of the nation.
Statement: Should agriculture in rural India be mechanized? Arguments: I. Yes. It would lead to higher production. II. No. Many villagers would be left unemployed.
Statement: Should the educated unemployed youth be paid "unemployment allowance" by the Government? Arguments: I. Yes. It will provide them some monetary help to either seek employment or to kickstart some 'self -employment' venture. II. No. It will dampen their urge to do something to earn their Livelihood and thus promote idleness among the unemployed youth.
Statement: Should all the practicing doctors be brought under Government control so that they get salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost? Arguments: I. No. How can any country do such an undemocratic thing? II. Yes. Despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate , unethical medical practices.
Statement: Should there be more than one High Courts in each state in India? Arguments: I. No. This will be a sheer wastage of taxpayers' money. II. Yes. This will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a very long time.
Statment Are nuclear families better than joint families? Argument I. No joint familes enssure security aand aalsso reduce the burden of work. II. Yes Nuclear families ensure greater freedom.
Statement : Should there be concentration of foreign investment in only few states? Argument : I. No. It is against the policy of overall development of the country. II. Yes. A large number of states lack infrastructure to attract foreign investment.
Statement : Should India engage into a dialogue with neighboring countries to stop cross border tension? Argument: I. Yes. This is the only way to reduce the cross border terrorism and stop loss of innocent lives. II. No. Neighboring countries cannot be relied upon in such matters, they may still engage in subversive activities.
Statement: Should system of offering jobs only to the wards of government employees be introduced in all government offices in India? Argument: I. No. It denies opportunity to many deserving individuals and government may stand to lose in the long run. II. No. It is against the principle of equality. Does not government owe its responsibility to all its citizens?
Statement: Should the sex determination test during pregnancy be completely banned? Arguments: I. Yes. This leads to indiscriminate female feticide and eventually will lead to social imbalance. II. No. People have a right to know about their unborn child.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion