Statement–Argument — Should people who receive dowry, despite anti-dowry law, be punished? Arguments: I) Yes; violating the law warrants punishment. II) No; dowry is culturally entrenched since time immemorial. Choose the strong argument(s).

Introduction / Context:Anti-dowry statutes criminalize taking/giving dowry due to harm to women and society. Enforcement is essential for deterrence.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Rule of law requires penalties for violations.
• Cultural prevalence does not legitimize illegal acts.
• Policy goal is to reduce coercion and violence associated with dowry.

Concept / Approach:Argument I is strong: upholding law is foundational. Argument II is weak: tradition cannot excuse illegality; past entrenchment is precisely why enforcement matters.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:Where enforcement weakens, harmful practices persist—supporting I.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:Options praising II misread law vs. tradition.

Common Pitfalls:Normalizing illegality due to custom.

Final Answer:if only argument I is strong.