Statement–Argument — Should people who receive dowry, despite anti-dowry law, be punished? Arguments: I) Yes; violating the law warrants punishment. II) No; dowry is culturally entrenched since time immemorial. Choose the strong argument(s).
Verbal Reasoning
Statement and Argument
Difficulty: Medium
Choose an option
-
Aif only argument I is strong
-
Bif only argument II is strong
-
Cif either I or II is strong
-
Dif neither I nor II is strong
-
ENone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: if only argument I is strong
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Anti-dowry statutes criminalize taking/giving dowry due to harm to women and society. Enforcement is essential for deterrence.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Rule of law requires penalties for violations.
- Cultural prevalence does not legitimize illegal acts.
- Policy goal is to reduce coercion and violence associated with dowry.
Concept / Approach:Argument I is strong: upholding law is foundational. Argument II is weak: tradition cannot excuse illegality; past entrenchment is precisely why enforcement matters.
Step-by-Step Solution:
I: Directly tied to legal compliance and deterrence—strong.II: Appeals to tradition (fallacy) and conflicts with legal/ethical aims—weak.Verification / Alternative check:Where enforcement weakens, harmful practices persist—supporting I.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Options praising II misread law vs. tradition.
Common Pitfalls:Normalizing illegality due to custom.
Final Answer:if only argument I is strong.