Situation–Reaction Test — Underperforming Colleague:\nYour colleague is not performing duties up to the mark. What will you do to protect customers and the company’s reputation while remaining professional?

Introduction / Context:
This scenario assesses professionalism, customer centricity, and ethical judgment at work. When a teammate underperforms, your response should protect customers and brand trust while avoiding impulsive blame or self-promotion.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Customer experience and company reputation are at stake.
• The colleague’s performance gap is affecting outcomes now.
• You have enough bandwidth to stabilize the situation in the short term.

Concept / Approach:
Prioritize customers first, then address root causes. A professional response balances immediate service recovery with constructive escalation through proper channels, focusing on facts and solutions rather than personal gain.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Cover urgent customer touchpoints so service quality does not degrade.2) Document issues neutrally (dates, impacts, customer risk).3) Offer the colleague help or clarifying SOPs; identify skills/support gaps.4) If problems persist, brief the manager privately with solutions (retraining, workload rebalance).

Verification / Alternative check:
Customer-first actions reduce churn and complaints. Managers value teammates who stabilize outcomes and propose fixes without drama.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Ignoring (a) lets issues worsen; opportunism (b) is unethical; immediate punitive escalation (c) without stabilizing customers is shortsighted; public confrontation (e) harms morale and may embarrass the colleague.

Common Pitfalls:
Personalizing the issue; venting in group chats; neglecting documentation.

Final Answer:
Protect customers now, then pursue supportive, solution-oriented remediation.