Situation–Reaction Test — Accident Disrupts Your Ability to Deliver an Urgent Task: You must complete a critical HQ task within two days, but you meet with an accident and your officer still insists you finish. What should you do?

Introduction / Context:
This scenario probes duty of care and continuity planning. Safety and health are paramount, yet organizational obligations require a credible continuity plan to protect outcomes.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• You suffered an accident and may be temporarily limited.
• A critical deliverable is due in two days.
• Your officer insists on completion despite circumstances.

Concept / Approach:
Provide for continuity without endangering yourself: nominate a qualified alternate, transfer context quickly, and keep HQ informed so timelines are preserved and risks are transparent.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Brief HQ on the incident and current capacity constraints.2) Propose one or two capable alternates with role clarity.3) Deliver a focused handover: objectives, status, blockers, contacts, files.4) Remain reachable for limited clarifications if medically feasible.

Verification / Alternative check:
Organizations that plan handovers recover faster from shocks; leadership values risk-aware continuity over heroics.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Extension only (a) may be denied; declaring inability (b) without a plan is unhelpful; disappearing (d) harms outcomes; working while injured (e) endangers health and quality.

Common Pitfalls:
Informal handovers; unclear ownership; failing to share access/credentials.

Final Answer:
Nominate an alternate and execute a crisp handover while prioritizing your medical care.