Statement: A huge tidal wave has swept away many fishing boats and hutments along the coastline. Courses of Action: I. Restrain fishermen from constructing huts along the coastline henceforth. II. Send officials to assess damage and suggest remedial measures.

Introduction / Context:Coastal hazards require risk-informed planning, relief, and resilient rebuilding. An unqualified blanket restraint on coastal housing is overbroad; zoning and safe-setback policies are better instruments.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Severe damage to boats and homes.
• Immediate needs: rescue, relief, assessment, and rehabilitation.
• Long-term: resilient siting and construction guidance.

Concept / Approach:II is essential: assess losses, provide relief/compensation, and propose mitigation (early warning, engineered shelters, safe setbacks). I, as phrased, is an outright restraint without nuance; better is regulated, resilient construction beyond hazard lines, not a total ban.

Step-by-Step Solution:1) Rapid damage assessment; release relief and repair grants.2) Map hazard zones; define no-build and safe-build areas with elevated structures.3) Restore livelihoods (boat repair, nets) and strengthen early-warning systems.

Verification / Alternative check:Assessment underpins targeted relief and smarter rebuilding; blanket bans can harm livelihoods and spur informal settlements.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:I is too absolute; proper policy is risk-based zoning, not prohibiting all coastal habitation.

Common Pitfalls:One-size-fits-all restrictions; delayed compensation.

Final Answer:Only II follows.