Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II is implicit
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Advertising often highlights a comparative advantage—in this case, longevity of PVC pipes. We must examine which strong statements about consumer preference and competitors are required for the ad’s persuasive force.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:The ad needs durability to matter, but not to the exclusion of all other buying factors (price, availability, brand, installation). It also does not need competitors to be “not durable,” only “less durable than PVC.”
Step-by-Step Solution:
I is too absolute (“only durable”). The ad can persuade even if durability is one among several valued attributes.II is also unnecessary: competitors may be durable, just not as long-lived as PVC.Verification / Alternative check:
If buyers value durability significantly (not exclusively), the claim still works; if competitors are somewhat durable but inferior, the claim still works—thus neither I nor II is required.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I-only or II-only or Both place unwarranted extremes on preference or competitor quality.Either: At least one is required—but neither is.Common Pitfalls:
Reading “advantage” as “others are bad,” and treating “important” as “only.”Final Answer:Neither I nor II is implicit
Discussion & Comments