Critical reasoning — identify implicit assumptions Statement: “Wanted a two-bedroom flat in the Court area for immediate possession.” — an advertisement in the classifieds. Assumptions to evaluate: I. Flats exist in the Court area (so a request there.

Question

Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question tests assumption recognition in argument-based verbal reasoning. An advertiser seeks a two-bedroom flat in the Court area for immediate possession. We must identify which background beliefs must be true for the advertisement to make sense, without being explicitly stated. Given Data / Assumptions: An ad requests a two-bedroom flat, specifically located in the Court area, and desires immediate possession. Assumption I: Flats exist in that locality (at least in principle, even if not currently vacant). Assumption II: Publishing the ad will reach potential respondents who can help. Assumption III: It is standard practice to use classifieds for this need. Concept / Approach:An assumption is implicit if the statement’s goal would be pointless without it. We apply the “negation test”: if negating an assumption makes the ad senseless or self-defeating, that assumption is implicit. We also avoid adding unnecessary generalizations (e.g., claiming a practice is universal). Step-by-Step Solution: Assess I: If no flats exist in the Court area, asking specifically for one there is meaningless. So I is required.Assess II: If nobody would respond, the ad would not achieve its purpose; running it presumes potential respondents. So II is required.Assess III: Even if it were not common practice, an individual could still decide to advertise this way. The ad does not require the practice to be “standard.” Hence III is not necessary. Verification / Alternative check:Real-world classified ads are placed with a belief in both the availability of the requested category and the likelihood of audience response. Whether the method is conventional or unconventional is irrelevant to the basic purpose. Why Other Options Are Wrong: All are implicit: Overstates necessity; the “common practice” claim is not essential. Only II is implicit: Ignores the need for the category’s existence in that locality. None is implicit: Contradicts the evident purpose assumptions behind the ad. None of these: Incorrect because “Only I and II are implicit” fits. Common Pitfalls:Confusing what is common with what is necessary; assuming market norms are always implied. Final Answer:Only I and II are implicit

More Questions from Statement and Assumption

Discussion & Comments