The statement says a man should be humble even after being victorious. This implies that people are usually not humble after victory. Assumption I just opposite to it, hence is not implicit. Assumption II generalises the statement. Generally, people may be humble, the point is if they are humble or not after victory. Hence, none follows.
It is given in the statement that income tax rules need to be amended to temp people to declare their actual wealth. It does not mean that income tax rules are not proper. Proper in what respect is not clear. However, Assumption II describes the reasons for such amendment of income tax rules. Hence, only Assumption II is implicit.
A decision is taken if it is felt that the decision would be an acceptance among mot of the people. Hence, Assumption I is implicit. Assumption II is also implicit as the reason behind need.
It is not necessary that the price rise be there in the mind of Government while taking the decision. In fact the truth is that our petroleum companies are running losses even after the drop in international price. Hence, both are invalid assumptions.
Assumption I and II both are implicit because both are imminent positive outcomes assumed.
Assumption I is implicit because when a decision is made it is assumed to be effective. further Assumption II is also implicit as it is assumed that the stipulated target will be met.
The driver does not have control on what the auto driver will do. Hence, I is invalid. But II is a valid assumption because if one takes an action he assumes its outcome.
Assumption I is implicit in the very giving of the advice. Assumption II is implicit in the condition attached.
When we urge someone to do something, we assume a positive response. Hence, Assumption I is implicit while for the same reason Assumption II becomes invalid.
Assumption I were implicit, such a decision would not be taken. Assumption II is implicit in the purpose of fund raising that has been mentioned in the statement.
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.