Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: If neither Conclusion I nor II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The premise reports an announcement of intended efforts in response to a serious problem. We must avoid over-reading the scope of the problem or the history of government action beyond what is stated.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Conclusions must be necessary consequences of the given statement. Announcing future action neither restricts the problem to only one group nor condemns all past efforts universally.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
It is consistent with the statement that other groups may also be at risk, and that some prior efforts existed but were insufficient. Hence neither I nor II is forced.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option asserting I or II adds content not present in the premise.
Common Pitfalls:
Treating a policy promise as evidence of prior total neglect; assuming exclusivity where none is stated.
Final Answer:
If neither Conclusion I nor II follows.
Discussion & Comments