Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: If neither Conclusion I nor II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The premise reports an announcement of intended efforts in response to a serious problem. We must avoid over-reading the scope of the problem or the history of government action beyond what is stated.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Conclusions must be necessary consequences of the given statement. Announcing future action neither restricts the problem to only one group nor condemns all past efforts universally.
Step-by-Step Solution:
• Conclusion I is too strong (“only farmers”), excluding other affected groups without basis.• Conclusion II generalises about “any section of society,” which is far beyond the scope of the remark.Verification / Alternative check:It is consistent with the statement that other groups may also be at risk, and that some prior efforts existed but were insufficient. Hence neither I nor II is forced.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Any option asserting I or II adds content not present in the premise.
Common Pitfalls:Treating a policy promise as evidence of prior total neglect; assuming exclusivity where none is stated.
Final Answer:If neither Conclusion I nor II follows.
Discussion & Comments