Premises — I) Hybrid plants are resistant to fungus. II) Fungal infection reduces the life of plants.\nQuestion — What practical conclusion follows for growers focused on plant longevity?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: For a long life-span grow hybrid plants

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The two premises link fungal resistance to hybrids and shorter life due to fungal infection. We seek a practical, actionable conclusion regarding lifespan, without adding claims about yield or universal classifications.



Given Data / Assumptions:


  • Hybrids resist fungus (reduced probability or impact of infection).
  • Fungal infection shortens plant life.


Concept / Approach:
If A resists B, and B causes harm C, then choosing A reduces the risk of C. Here, “hybrid” reduces fungus; fungus reduces lifespan; hence hybrids support longer lifespan relative to susceptible varieties.



Step-by-Step Solution:


Map premises: Hybrid → (resistant to) Fungus; Fungus → reduces life.Actionable inference: Prefer hybrids to mitigate fungus-driven life reduction.No claim is made about yield, universal hybridity, or whether hybrids are the only solution.


Verification / Alternative check:
Even if other diseases exist, choosing hybrids at least addresses the stated fungal pathway; thus the recommendation remains sound under the premises.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:


B contradicts premise I. C introduces yield (unstated). D is a universal quantifier not supported. “None” fails because A follows.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming resistance equals invulnerability; here we only require that resistance reduces risk sufficiently to support the conclusion.



Final Answer:
For a long life-span grow hybrid plants

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion