Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: For a long life-span grow hybrid plants
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The two premises link fungal resistance to hybrids and shorter life due to fungal infection. We seek a practical, actionable conclusion regarding lifespan, without adding claims about yield or universal classifications.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:If A resists B, and B causes harm C, then choosing A reduces the risk of C. Here, “hybrid” reduces fungus; fungus reduces lifespan; hence hybrids support longer lifespan relative to susceptible varieties.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Map premises: Hybrid → (resistant to) Fungus; Fungus → reduces life.Actionable inference: Prefer hybrids to mitigate fungus-driven life reduction.No claim is made about yield, universal hybridity, or whether hybrids are the only solution.Verification / Alternative check:Even if other diseases exist, choosing hybrids at least addresses the stated fungal pathway; thus the recommendation remains sound under the premises.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
B contradicts premise I. C introduces yield (unstated). D is a universal quantifier not supported. “None” fails because A follows.Common Pitfalls:Assuming resistance equals invulnerability; here we only require that resistance reduces risk sufficiently to support the conclusion.
Final Answer:For a long life-span grow hybrid plants
Discussion & Comments