Statement — Computer advertisements now fill magazine pages, but the real computer revolution in India is happening quietly inside government organisations. Question — Which conclusion necessarily follows?

Introduction / Context:The stem contrasts visible commercial advertising with a “quiet” revolution within government organisations. We must examine two possible conclusions and decide which is guaranteed by the statement.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Magazines are full of computer ads.
• The substantive adoption/impact (“revolution”) is occurring within government organisations, quietly.
• No assertion is made about who places the ads.

Concept / Approach:Conclusion I generalises the stated locus of change (government bodies adopting/computerising). Conclusion II adds an unrelated claim about advertising behaviour by government, which is not contained in the stem.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:Even if some ads are governmental, the contrast (ads vs quiet internal change) remains. The statement’s truth does not depend on II being true.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:Reading more into who buys magazine ads than the statement provides.

Final Answer:if only Conclusion I follows