Question 1

Which one of the following substances is not a semiconductor material used in electronics?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question comes from basic electronics and solid state physics. Semiconductor materials are extremely important in making diodes, transistors and integrated circuits. Common semiconductor materials include silicon, germanium and gallium arsenide. The question asks you to identify which listed material is not classed as a semiconductor in typical electronic applications. Given Data / Assumptions: The options include silicon, germanium, quartz, gallium arsenide and silicon carbide. We are asked to pick the one that is not a semiconductor. Assume standard electronic materials classification at room temperature. Concept / Approach: Silicon and germanium are classic elemental semiconductors. Gallium arsenide is a compound semiconductor used in high speed and optoelectronic devices. Silicon carbide is also used as a wide band gap semiconductor in high power electronics. Quartz is crystalline silicon dioxide and is typically an insulator or dielectric, not a semiconductor. While quartz is used in electronic circuits as a piezoelectric crystal, it does not conduct like a semiconductor. Therefore, quartz is the material that is not a semiconductor among the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise silicon as the most widely used semiconductor for integrated circuits and devices. Step 2: Recognise germanium as another semiconductor material used in early transistors and in some specialised applications. Step 3: Identify gallium arsenide as a compound semiconductor used in high frequency and optoelectronic devices. Step 4: Silicon carbide is also known to be a wide band gap semiconductor used for high temperature and high power applications. Step 5: Quartz, which is crystalline silicon dioxide, is an electrical insulator and does not show typical semiconductor conductivity. It is used mainly as a dielectric and piezoelectric material, not as a semiconductor. Verification / Alternative check: Electronics textbooks list silicon, germanium, gallium arsenide and silicon carbide under semiconductor materials and describe their band structures in detail. Quartz, on the other hand, appears in discussions of dielectric materials and piezoelectric crystals. Its electrical resistivity is much higher than that of semiconductors, and it does not form p n junctions in the same way. Practical device examples such as quartz crystal oscillators use quartz for its mechanical and piezoelectric properties but rely on other materials for semiconductor functions. This confirms that quartz is not a semiconductor. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Silicon: A standard semiconductor and primary material for most microchips. Germanium: An elemental semiconductor historically important in early electronics. Gallium arsenide: A compound semiconductor used in lasers, LEDs and high frequency devices. Silicon carbide: A semiconductor used where high power and high temperature performance is required. Common Pitfalls: Some learners know that quartz is related to silicon and may assume anything containing silicon is a semiconductor. However, silicon dioxide in crystalline form behaves as an insulator, not like elemental silicon. It is also easy to assume that any material used in electronics must be a semiconductor, but many, like quartz, glass and plastics, serve as insulators or mechanical components. Separating the roles of different materials in electronic circuits helps answer such questions correctly. Final Answer: The substance that is not a semiconductor is Quartz.

Question 2

The pH value of a sample of multiple distilled pure water, with minimal dissolved impurities, is expected to be which of the following?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of pH and the nature of pure water. Pure water is a standard reference point on the pH scale and is used to define neutrality. Multiple distilled water has gone through several stages of purification to remove dissolved salts and other impurities, so its pH gives you an ideal view of neutral water conditions. Given Data / Assumptions: The sample is multiple distilled water, which is very pure. We want to know the expected pH value description. Options describe pH as zero, fourteen, very near to zero, very near to seven or very near to fourteen. Assume standard temperature conditions close to room temperature. Concept / Approach: Pure water undergoes slight self ionisation into H plus and OH minus ions. At 25 degrees Celsius, the concentrations of H plus and OH minus are each 10 raised to the power minus 7 moles per litre, giving a pH of 7, which is defined as neutral. Real samples may deviate slightly due to dissolved carbon dioxide and other impurities, but multiple distilled water is designed to be very close to this ideal. Therefore, its pH is expected to be very near to seven, not near zero or fourteen, which represent strong acidity or basicity. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the pH of neutral pure water at 25 degrees Celsius is defined as 7. Step 2: Multiple distilled water has very few dissolved ions and so closely approximates pure water. Step 3: Because both hydrogen ion and hydroxide ion concentrations are equal and very small, the solution is neutral, giving a pH near 7. Step 4: Values of pH near zero indicate very strong acids, which is not the case for distilled water. Step 5: Values near fourteen indicate very strong bases, again not applicable for multiple distilled water. Verification / Alternative check: Laboratory measurements of freshly prepared distilled water typically show pH values slightly below or above 7, depending on exposure to air and carbon dioxide. For example, absorbing a little carbon dioxide can reduce pH slightly below 7, but it still remains close to neutrality. Calibration of pH meters often uses a buffer solution with pH 7, which models neutral water. The general teaching is that pure water is neutral and has pH 7, so the answer choice indicating very near to seven is the best description. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Zero: A pH of zero would correspond to a very strong acid, not distilled water. Fourteen: A pH of fourteen is characteristic of very strong bases such as concentrated sodium hydroxide, not pure water. Very near to zero: Still implies high acidity, which does not match neutral water. Very near to fourteen: Implies high basicity, again not correct for distilled water. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may have heard that real water can be slightly acidic due to dissolved carbon dioxide and incorrectly conclude that very pure water must have a much lower pH. However, even with small amounts of carbon dioxide, the pH remains close to 7 and does not approach extreme acidic values. Another confusion is mixing up pure water with everyday tap water, which contains various dissolved salts and may not be exactly neutral. For examination purposes, you should associate pure or multiple distilled water with a pH very close to seven. Final Answer: The pH value of multiple distilled water is expected to be Very near to seven.

Question 3

Which one of the following is the most characteristic fundamental property that uniquely identifies a chemical element?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of atomic structure and how elements are defined in modern chemistry. While many physical properties like density and boiling point are associated with specific elements, they can vary with conditions and do not uniquely define an element. The key property that does uniquely identify an element is the atomic number, which is central to the periodic table and chemical identity. Given Data / Assumptions: The options list density, boiling point, mass number, atomic number and melting point. We are asked which is the most characteristic property of an element. We assume standard definitions where atomic number is the number of protons in the nucleus. Concept / Approach: Atomic number is defined as the number of protons in the nucleus of an atom. Every element has a unique atomic number. For example, hydrogen has atomic number 1, helium has 2, and so on. If an atom has a certain atomic number, it must be that element and no other. Mass number can vary among isotopes of the same element. Density, boiling point and melting point can change with pressure, temperature, and allotropic forms, and are not uniquely tied to a specific element in the same strict way. Therefore, atomic number is the most characteristic property of a chemical element. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the atomic number, Z, is the count of protons in the nucleus of each atom of an element. Step 2: Recognise that changing the number of protons changes the element itself. For instance, an atom with 6 protons is carbon, while one with 7 protons is nitrogen. Step 3: Note that mass number, A, equals the sum of protons and neutrons, and can vary for different isotopes of the same element. Step 4: Recognise that density, boiling point and melting point can vary with external conditions and may overlap for different elements or allotropes. Step 5: Conclude that atomic number is the unique and most fundamental property that characterises an element. Verification / Alternative check: The periodic table is organised by increasing atomic number, not by mass number or density. When chemists discovered new elements, they assigned them places in the table using their atomic numbers. Isotopes of the same element share the same atomic number but differ in mass number, showing that mass number does not define the element. Physical properties such as density and boiling point also vary among isotopes and can overlap between different substances. This reinforces that atomic number is the primary identifier of a chemical element. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Density: Depends on physical state, temperature and pressure, and can be similar for different substances. Boiling point: Varies with pressure and can be similar for different compounds or elements, so it does not uniquely identify an element. Mass number: Different isotopes of the same element have different mass numbers, so mass number is not unique to the element. Melting point: Like boiling point, this physical property can change with pressure and does not uniquely define the element. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may be misled by familiar tables of physical properties and think that properties like melting point always uniquely pick out an element. However, those properties can shift with conditions and may be similar among different substances. The key idea is that at the atomic level, the proton count is what makes one element different from another. Remembering that atomic number equals number of protons and defines the element will help you answer many questions about atomic structure and the periodic table accurately. Final Answer: The most characteristic property of an element is its Atomic number.

Question 4

The Plum Pudding model of the atom was proposed by which scientist in the early history of atomic structure?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The question belongs to the history of atomic models in chemistry and physics. Before the modern nuclear model and quantum mechanical descriptions were established, scientists proposed simpler models to explain the structure of the atom. The Plum Pudding model is one of the earliest models that attempted to incorporate the newly discovered electron into an overall picture of the atom. Understanding who proposed this model helps you keep track of the sequence of atomic theories from Dalton's solid sphere model to Rutherford's nuclear model and beyond. Given Data / Assumptions: The name of the model is Plum Pudding model. The model was proposed after the discovery of the electron. We must identify the scientist who introduced this model. Options include Lavoisier, Boyle, Rutherford, J. J. Thomson and Dalton. Concept / Approach: The key is to recall which scientist discovered the electron and how he visualised the atom immediately after this discovery. J. J. Thomson discovered the electron using cathode ray experiments. To accommodate negatively charged electrons in a neutral atom, he proposed the Plum Pudding model. In this model, the atom was imagined as a positively charged sphere with negatively charged electrons embedded in it, similar to plums or raisins embedded in a pudding or cake. This idea is very different from Rutherford's nuclear model, which came later from alpha scattering experiments. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that John Dalton proposed an early atomic theory in which atoms were solid indivisible spheres, without internal structure. Step 2: Later, J. J. Thomson discovered the electron, showing that atoms contain smaller charged particles. Step 3: To explain how electrons could exist inside atoms while keeping the atom overall neutral, Thomson proposed the Plum Pudding model. Step 4: In this model, the atom is pictured as a sphere of diffuse positive charge with electrons embedded like plums in a pudding. Step 5: Ernest Rutherford later disproved this model through his gold foil experiment and proposed the nuclear model with a small, dense, positively charged nucleus. Step 6: Lavoisier and Boyle are associated with laws of chemical combination and gas behaviour but not with atomic models of this type. Step 7: Therefore, the scientist who proposed the Plum Pudding model is J. J. Thomson. Verification / Alternative check: Textbook timelines of atomic structure usually present Dalton's atomic theory, followed by Thomson's discovery of the electron and his Plum Pudding model, then Rutherford's nuclear model and Bohr's planetary model. If you remember that Thomson is linked with cathode rays and the electron, it becomes easy to associate him with the first structured model that included electrons. No other scientist in the options is described as proposing a pudding like atomic model. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Antoine Lavoisier worked on conservation of mass and chemical nomenclature, not on detailed atomic structure. Robert Boyle is known for Boyle's law relating pressure and volume of a gas. Ernest Rutherford proposed the nuclear model, not the Plum Pudding model. John Dalton introduced the idea of atoms as indivisible solid spheres, which predates the discovery of the electron. None of these match the description of the Plum Pudding model originator. Common Pitfalls: A common confusion is between Thomson and Rutherford, because both contributed to early atomic models. A simple way to distinguish them is to remember that Thomson is associated with electrons and a diffuse positive sphere, while Rutherford is associated with alpha particle scattering and a tiny dense nucleus. Another pitfall is to assume that Dalton, being the earliest atomic theorist, must have proposed all atomic models, which is not correct. Each scientist added a different layer of understanding. Final Answer: The Plum Pudding model of the atom was proposed by J. J. Thomson.

Question 5

The chemical properties and reactivity of an element mainly depend on which of the following features of its atomic structure?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of how atomic structure controls the chemical behaviour of elements. In periodic table and bonding chapters, you repeatedly see that valence electrons, that is, electrons in the outermost shell, determine how an atom will bond, what type of compounds it will form and how reactive it is. Recognising this relationship is crucial for predicting trends and reactions in chemistry. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks which atomic property chemical properties depend on. Options mention isotopes, mass number, neutrons, outermost electrons and total nucleons. We assume neutral atoms in ground state and basic school level chemistry. Concept / Approach: Chemical properties are determined by how atoms gain, lose or share electrons to achieve stable electronic configurations. These processes mainly involve the electrons in the highest energy shell, called valence electrons. The number of valence electrons decides whether an element behaves as a metal, non metal or noble gas and whether it tends to form ionic or covalent bonds. Mass number, number of neutrons and isotopic composition have relatively little effect on ordinary chemical reactions, though they do affect nuclear properties and atomic mass. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that in the Bohr model and modern atomic theory, electrons occupy shells or energy levels around the nucleus. Step 2: Electrons present in the outermost shell are called valence electrons. Step 3: During chemical reactions, atoms typically lose, gain or share these valence electrons to reach a stable configuration, often like that of the nearest noble gas. Step 4: The number of valence electrons therefore determines the valency, types of bonds and general reactivity of the element. Step 5: Isotopes of an element have the same number of protons and electrons but different numbers of neutrons; they show almost identical chemical behaviour, which proves that neutrons and mass number are not the primary determinants of chemical properties. Step 6: Total nucleons (protons plus neutrons) define mass number and nuclear properties but do not control how atoms bond in typical chemical reactions. Step 7: Hence, the correct choice is the number of electrons in the outermost shell of the element. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify this principle by looking at elements in the same group of the periodic table. For example, all alkali metals in group 1 have one electron in their outermost shell and show similar chemical properties such as forming +1 ions and reacting vigorously with water. Similarly, all halogens in group 17 have seven valence electrons and form similar types of compounds. Their isotopes, which differ in neutron number, do not differ much in chemical behaviour. This pattern confirms that valence electrons are the key factor. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The number of isotopes only tells how many naturally occurring varieties of an element exist and has little effect on its basic chemistry. Mass number and total neutrons influence nuclear stability and atomic mass but do not change the way electrons are arranged in shells for a given element. Total protons plus neutrons is again just the mass number. Only the arrangement and count of electrons, especially in the outermost shell, controls chemical properties and reaction patterns. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse physical properties like atomic mass or density with chemical properties. Although mass can slightly affect reaction rates, it does not fundamentally change how the element reacts. Another pitfall is to think that more massive atoms are always more reactive, which is not always true. Focusing on valence electrons provides a cleaner and more reliable way to understand chemical behaviour across the periodic table. Final Answer: The chemical properties of an element mainly depend on the number of electrons in the outermost shell of the element.

Question 6

In the context of cathode ray discharge tubes, which one of the following statements about cathode rays is not correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the early experimental study of electrons using cathode ray discharge tubes. Understanding cathode rays is important because they led to the discovery of the electron and provided evidence that atoms contain smaller charged particles. The question asks which statement about cathode rays is not correct, so you must recall their key properties and behaviour in the discharge tube. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider a classic cathode ray discharge tube experiment. Cathode rays travel from cathode to anode when a high voltage is applied across electrodes in low pressure gas. Options present several statements describing origin, visibility, dependence on gas and behaviour in fields. We must pick the statement that is factually incorrect. Concept / Approach: Cathode rays are streams of electrons emitted from the cathode in a discharge tube. Their properties, such as charge to mass ratio and direction of motion, are independent of the type of gas in the tube or the metal used for electrodes. This universality showed that electrons are fundamental constituents of all atoms. Cathode rays travel from cathode to anode, are not directly visible, cause fluorescence when they strike certain materials and can be deflected by electric and magnetic fields. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check statement A: Cathode rays originate from the cathode and move towards the anode. This is correct and is observed in experiments. Step 2: Check statement B: Television picture tubes are modified cathode ray tubes in which an electron beam creates images on a fluorescent screen. This is correct. Step 3: Check statement C: The rays themselves are not visible; we see only the glow produced on the glass or fluorescent screen. This is correct. Step 4: Check statement E: Cathode rays are deflected by electric and magnetic fields, which proves they carry electric charge. This is also correct. Step 5: Check statement D: It claims that the characteristics of cathode rays depend on the nature of the gas present in the tube. Step 6: Experiments show that cathode rays always consist of electrons with the same charge and similar properties irrespective of the gas or cathode material. Step 7: Therefore, statement D is not correct and should be selected as the answer. Verification / Alternative check: In many textbooks, the universality of electron properties is emphasised by stating that the charge to mass ratio of cathode rays is the same for all gases and electrode materials. This was a key point for concluding that electrons are fundamental particles present in all atoms. If the gas type changed the basic character of cathode rays, this conclusion would not hold. Hence, any statement claiming that cathode ray characteristics depend on the gas must be false at this level. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Statements A, B and C describe standard experimental observations and are well supported by evidence. Statement E reflects an important property used to measure the charge to mass ratio of electrons. These are correct statements and therefore cannot be the answer to a question asking for the incorrect one. Only statement D contradicts the well established finding that cathode rays have the same basic properties regardless of the gas in the tube. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse the behaviour of cathode rays with that of positive rays (canal rays), whose characteristics do depend on the type of gas present. Remember that positive rays originate from ionised gas particles, so their mass and charge vary with the gas. Cathode rays, however, are streams of electrons, so their basic properties remain constant. Mixing up these two types of rays is a frequent source of error in such questions. Final Answer: The incorrect statement is that the characteristics of cathode rays depend upon the nature of the gas present in the cathode ray tube.

Question 7

The molecular mass of sulphuric acid is 98. If 49 g of pure H2SO4 is dissolved in water to prepare one litre of solution, what will be the normality (strength) of the acid solution?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of the concept of normality in solution chemistry and how to calculate it for an acid like sulphuric acid. In titration and concentration calculations, it is important to know not only molarity but also normality, especially when dealing with acids and bases that can donate or accept more than one proton. Sulphuric acid, H2SO4, is a diprotic acid, so each mole can supply two equivalents of hydrogen ions in reactions where full neutralisation occurs. Given Data / Assumptions: Molecular mass of H2SO4 is given as 98 g per mole. Mass of H2SO4 used = 49 g. Volume of the solution prepared = 1 litre. We assume complete ionisation to give two hydrogen ions per molecule in the context of normality. Concept / Approach: Normality (N) is defined as the number of gram equivalents of solute per litre of solution. For an acid, gram equivalent mass is given by molecular mass divided by basicity, where basicity is the number of ionisable hydrogen ions per molecule. Sulphuric acid has basicity 2, because each molecule can provide two H+ ions in neutralisation reactions. Therefore, equivalent mass of H2SO4 = 98 / 2 = 49 g. One gram equivalent of H2SO4 is thus 49 g. If 49 g is dissolved to make one litre, the solution is 1 equivalent per litre, that is, 1 N. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note the molecular mass of H2SO4, which is 98 g per mole. Step 2: Identify the basicity of sulphuric acid. H2SO4 can release two hydrogen ions per molecule in neutralisation, so its basicity is 2. Step 3: Calculate the equivalent mass of H2SO4 using the formula: equivalent mass = molecular mass / basicity. Step 4: Substitute values: equivalent mass = 98 / 2 = 49 g per equivalent. Step 5: The problem states that 49 g of H2SO4 is dissolved to make 1 litre of solution. Step 6: Since 49 g is exactly one equivalent mass, the solution contains 1 equivalent of H2SO4 in 1 litre. Step 7: Normality N is defined as equivalents per litre, so N = 1 equivalent per litre = 1 N. Verification / Alternative check: You can also think in terms of molarity and then convert to normality. If 49 g of H2SO4 is present, that is 49 / 98 = 0.5 moles in one litre, so molarity is 0.5 M. For a diprotic acid that donates two hydrogen ions, normality for acid base reactions is N = basicity * molarity = 2 * 0.5 = 1 N. This alternative route leads to the same answer and confirms the calculation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Two normal would require 2 equivalents per litre, which for H2SO4 would be 2 * 49 = 98 g per litre, not 49 g. A value of 0.5 normal would correspond to 0.5 equivalents, or 24.5 g of H2SO4 per litre. Four normal would require 4 equivalents, that is, 196 g per litre. A value of 0.25 normal would require only 12.25 g per litre. None of these match the given 49 g per litre situation. Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse molarity with normality and may answer 0.5, thinking in terms of moles only. It is crucial to adjust for the number of ionisable hydrogen ions in acids or hydroxyl groups in bases. Another common error is to misapply the basicity, using 1 instead of 2 for H2SO4. Always check whether the acid is monoprotic, diprotic or triprotic before computing equivalent mass or normality. Final Answer: The normality of the solution prepared by dissolving 49 g of H2SO4 in one litre of solution is one normal (1 N).

Question 8

In the sentence As feared, (differences into) the families pose a hurdle, which phrase should replace the bracketed words to make the sentence grammatically correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Although listed under chemistry, this question actually tests English grammar and correct usage of prepositions in a common expression. Competitive exams often mix basic language questions into general knowledge sections. The sentence given uses a bracketed phrase that is grammatically wrong, and you are asked to select the phrase that correctly shows a contrast or separation between two families. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: As feared, (differences into) the families pose a hurdle. The bracketed phrase needs to be replaced with a grammatically correct alternative. We assume the intended meaning is that existing differences between two families are creating a problem. Options include several phrases built around the word difference or differences. Concept / Approach: In English, when we talk about how two groups or people are not the same, we usually use the preposition between after the word differences. The standard collocation is differences between the families. Prepositions like into or amongst would not fit naturally in this structure. Therefore, the correct improvement will use the plural noun differences followed by between to connect the two sides that are in disagreement. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider the intended meaning of the sentence. It suggests that there are disagreements or differences separating the families, and these differences are causing a hurdle. Step 2: In English, when we compare or contrast two groups, we normally say differences between the families. Step 3: Evaluate option A, differences into. The preposition into does not follow differences in this context and sounds incorrect. Step 4: Evaluate option B, difference as in. This phrase changes the plural to singular and uses an unnatural preposition for this sentence structure. Step 5: Evaluate option C, differences amongst. We usually use amongst when referring to differences within a single large group, not when contrasting two sides such as two families. Step 6: Option D, no improvement, would keep the clearly incorrect phrase differences into, so it cannot be right. Step 7: Option E, differences between, correctly uses the plural noun and the standard preposition for contrast between two parties. Step 8: Therefore, the bracketed part should be replaced by differences between. Verification / Alternative check: You can test the alternatives by reading the sentence aloud: As feared, differences between the families pose a hurdle sounds natural and clear. In contrast, As feared, differences into the families or differences amongst the families sound awkward and do not match standard English collocations. Grammar reference books and exam preparation material repeatedly use between for contrasts involving two distinct people or groups, reinforcing that between is appropriate here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Differences into uses an incorrect preposition and is ungrammatical. Difference as in changes the meaning and does not correctly connect two opposing sides. Differences amongst might be used if the sentence spoke about differences amongst the family members of a single family, which is not the case here. No improvement is incorrect because the original bracketed phrase clearly contains an error. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to focus only on the noun difference or differences and ignore the preposition that follows, even though the preposition often determines correctness. Another pitfall is to overuse amongst in situations where between is required, especially when talking about exactly two clearly defined groups. Remember the simple guideline that between is usually preferred when talking about two distinct parties. Final Answer: The correct replacement is differences between, so the improved sentence reads: As feared, differences between the families pose a hurdle.

Question 9

What is the correct chemical formula for sulphurous acid, the oxyacid of sulphur in which sulphur has an oxidation state of plus four?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of formulas of common inorganic acids, especially oxyacids of sulphur. Sulphur forms several important acids, including sulphuric acid and sulphurous acid. Being able to distinguish their formulas is essential for writing balanced equations, understanding redox states and solving stoichiometry problems in inorganic chemistry. Given Data / Assumptions: We are asked for the chemical formula of sulphurous acid. Sulphurous acid is an oxyacid of sulphur where sulphur is in the plus four oxidation state. Options include H2SO4, H2SO3, H3SO3, H3SO4 and HSO3. We assume standard representations used in school chemistry. Concept / Approach: Sulphurous acid is derived from sulphur dioxide, SO2, by hydration and is less oxidised than sulphuric acid. In sulphuric acid, sulphur has oxidation state plus six and the formula is H2SO4. In sulphurous acid, sulphur has oxidation state plus four, and the corresponding acid formula is H2SO3. Both are dibasic acids, meaning each molecule can donate two hydrogen ions in acid base reactions. The count of hydrogen atoms and oxygen atoms must be consistent with this structure and oxidation state. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that sulphuric acid has formula H2SO4 and corresponds to the higher oxidation state of sulphur, plus six. Step 2: Sulphurous acid is the acid associated with sulphur dioxide, where sulphur is in oxidation state plus four. Step 3: For sulphur in plus four state with two acidic hydrogens, the appropriate formula is H2SO3. Step 4: Check oxidation state in H2SO3. Let oxidation state of sulphur be x. Hydrogen is plus one each, oxygen is minus two. Step 5: Write the equation for the neutral molecule: 2*(+1) + x + 3*(-2) = 0. Step 6: This simplifies to 2 + x - 6 = 0, so x - 4 = 0 and x = +4, which matches sulphurous acid. Step 7: Therefore, H2SO3 is the correct formula for sulphurous acid. Verification / Alternative check: Another way to verify is to remember that sulphurous acid is dibasic, so it must contain two hydrogen atoms. This rules out HSO3 immediately. Then, comparing H2SO3 and H2SO4, you know that H2SO4 is the well known sulphuric acid. That leaves H2SO3 as sulphurous acid. Formulas like H3SO3 or H3SO4 would indicate a tribasic acid with three hydrogen ions, which is not how these sulphur oxyacids are classified in standard chemistry texts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: H2SO4 is sulphuric acid, not sulphurous acid, and corresponds to sulphur in oxidation state plus six. H3SO3 and H3SO4 would imply three acidic hydrogens and are not standard formulas for known simple sulphur oxyacids at this level. HSO3 is an anion form, the hydrogen sulphite ion, not the neutral acid molecule. Therefore, these options do not correctly represent sulphurous acid. Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse sulphuric acid and sulphurous acid because their names are very similar and differ only by the suffix. A useful memory aid is that the more oxidised acid, sulphuric, has more oxygen atoms (H2SO4), while the less oxidised sulphurous acid has fewer oxygen atoms (H2SO3). Another pitfall is to forget that these acids are dibasic, leading to incorrect hydrogen counts in proposed formulas. Keeping track of both oxidation state and basicity helps avoid such errors. Final Answer: The correct chemical formula for sulphurous acid is H2SO3.

Question 10

The process in which a liquid on cooling turns into a solid with the formation of crystals is called its ___________.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to basic physical chemistry and changes of state. It focuses on the process by which a liquid becomes a solid, forming an ordered crystalline structure. Understanding terms such as melting, freezing, crystallisation, evaporation and condensation is important for describing everyday phenomena like formation of sugar crystals, freezing of water, and purification of substances by crystallisation. Given Data / Assumptions: The process considered is a liquid turning into a solid on cooling. Crystals of the solid are formed during this process. We need to select the correct scientific term that describes this change. Options include crystallisation, melting point, evaporation, sublimation and condensation. Concept / Approach: Crystallisation is the process by which a substance forms a crystalline solid from a liquid or solution. When a hot saturated solution of a solute is cooled, the solubility decreases and excess solute separates as pure crystals. Similarly, when a pure liquid solidifies in an ordered arrangement, this process can also be described as crystallisation. The term melting point is a temperature, not a process. Evaporation is conversion of a liquid to gas, sublimation is direct conversion of solid to gas and condensation is gas to liquid. None of these fit the description of liquid to crystalline solid on cooling. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the direction of change in state: the question clearly describes a liquid becoming a solid when cooled. Step 2: Recall that the general term for liquid to solid change is freezing or solidification, and when the solid forms an ordered structure, it is often called crystallisation. Step 3: Crystallisation is specifically used when pure crystals form from a solution or melt, which matches the description of crystals forming as the liquid cools. Step 4: Examine the option melting point. Melting point is the temperature at which a solid becomes a liquid; it is a property, not a process in the reverse direction. Step 5: Evaporation is the process of a liquid changing into vapour, which is not involved here. Step 6: Sublimation is the change from solid directly to vapour, skipping the liquid state; again, this does not match the given description. Step 7: Condensation is gas to liquid, also unrelated to liquid forming a solid. Step 8: Therefore, the only option that correctly names the process is crystallisation. Verification / Alternative check: In laboratory practice, crystallisation is a common method of purification. A hot saturated solution of a solid like copper sulphate is cooled, and as it cools, blue crystals separate out. This is exactly a case of a liquid solution forming a solid crystalline phase. The word crystallisation is used consistently in school chemistry for this process, confirming that it is the correct term when a liquid or solution yields a crystalline solid upon cooling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Melting point is a temperature value where solid becomes liquid; it is not a process in which liquid becomes solid. Evaporation describes liquid to gas, sublimation describes solid to gas and condensation describes gas to liquid. Since the question clearly states that a liquid turns into a solid, these three options cannot be correct. They involve different pairs of states and different directions of change. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse melting and freezing terminology because they are reverse processes. It is important to note that melting point and freezing point are often the same numerical temperature, but the process names depend on the direction of change. Another pitfall is to think of crystallisation only as something that happens in industry, forgetting that it is the basic scientific term for crystal formation when a liquid or solution cools. Final Answer: The process in which a liquid on cooling turns into a solid with the formation of crystals is called crystallisation.

Question 11

The substances which have very low ignition temperature and can easily catch fire when brought near a flame are called __________ substances.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question relates to basic concepts in combustion and fire safety. Understanding terms such as ignition temperature, combustible and inflammable is important in everyday life and in science. Substances that catch fire very easily pose greater risks and are often labelled with warning symbols. The question asks for the specific term used for substances that ignite readily because they have very low ignition temperature. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider substances with very low ignition temperature. They can easily catch fire when brought near a flame. We are asked to identify the correct descriptive term. Options include hazardous, perilous, incombustible, inflammable and non reactive. Concept / Approach: Ignition temperature is the lowest temperature at which a substance catches fire and continues to burn. Substances with low ignition temperatures need only a small amount of heat or a small flame to start burning. In school chemistry, such substances are called inflammable or highly inflammable. The word hazardous simply means dangerous in a general sense and does not specifically refer to ease of catching fire. Perilous also means dangerous but is not a scientific term. Incombustible means cannot burn and is opposite to what is described. Non reactive refers to chemical inertness, not flammability. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that the question emphasises very low ignition temperature and easy catching fire. Step 2: Recall that substances like petrol, alcohol and LPG are described as inflammable or highly inflammable, meaning they catch fire very easily. Step 3: Examine option D, inflammable. This is the standard term used on warning labels and in textbooks to mark materials that burn easily. Step 4: Option A, hazardous, is a general safety term that can apply to many types of risks, not only fire, and does not specifically describe ignition temperature. Step 5: Option B, perilous, is also a general English word for dangerous, not a technical classification. Step 6: Option C, incombustible, means not capable of burning, which is opposite to what is described in the question. Step 7: Option E, non reactive, indicates lack of chemical reactivity and does not specifically address how easily a material burns. Step 8: Thus the correct term is inflammable. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify this by thinking about labels on petrol pumps, gas cylinders and paint tins, which carry fire hazard symbols and often include the word inflammable or flammable. In many school science textbooks, examples of substances with low ignition temperature are given, and such materials are referred to as inflammable substances. This consistent usage in both daily life and textbooks confirms that inflammable is the intended term here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Hazardous and perilous describe overall danger and do not specifically refer to how easily a material catches fire. Incombustible means fireproof or not capable of burning, which is directly contrary to the description of easily catching fire. Non reactive is a broad term for low chemical reactivity and may apply to inert gases, which do not burn easily at all. None of these capture the combination of low ignition temperature and easy flammability described in the question. Common Pitfalls: Some students may be confused by the prefix in in inflammable and think it means not flammable. Historically, inflammable and flammable both mean capable of catching fire, and many safety organisations now prefer the simpler term flammable to avoid confusion. In exam contexts, however, inflammable is still widely used to describe substances that ignite easily. Paying attention to definitions given in your textbook can help avoid misinterpretation of this word. Final Answer: Substances with very low ignition temperature that can easily catch fire are called inflammable substances.

Question 12

Human kidney stones are most commonly composed of which chemical substance?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question connects chemistry with human biology and health. Kidney stones are solid deposits that can form in the urinary system, and understanding their typical chemical composition is important for both medical science and general awareness. Many competitive exams ask which compound is the main constituent of common kidney stones. Given Data / Assumptions: The focus is on human kidney stones. We must identify their most common chemical component. Options include calcium oxalate, sodium chloride, magnesium nitrate, calcium bicarbonate and ammonium sulphate. We assume typical dietary habits and ordinary clinical cases. Concept / Approach: Most kidney stones in humans are composed primarily of calcium compounds, and among these, calcium oxalate stones are the most common type. Less frequently, stones can be formed from uric acid, cystine or other salts. Sodium chloride is common salt and does not usually crystallise in the kidneys in this way. Magnesium nitrate and ammonium sulphate are not typical kidney stone constituents. Calcium bicarbonate is associated with temporary hardness of water but is not the standard composition of kidney stones. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall from biology and health education that the majority of kidney stones are calcium based. Step 2: Among calcium salts, the most common in kidney stones is calcium oxalate, which can precipitate when urine is supersaturated with oxalate and calcium ions. Step 3: Examine option A, calcium oxalate. This matches the textbook statement that most kidney stones are calcium oxalate stones. Step 4: Option B, sodium chloride, is common salt that dissolves readily in water and does not typically form stones in the urinary tract. Step 5: Option C, magnesium nitrate, is a soluble salt that is not known as a major kidney stone component. Step 6: Option D, calcium bicarbonate, is associated with temporary hardness in water and can decompose to calcium carbonate, but this is not usually given as the main composition of kidney stones. Step 7: Option E, ammonium sulphate, is a fertiliser compound and not typical of kidney stones. Step 8: Therefore, the correct answer is calcium oxalate. Verification / Alternative check: Standard biology and general science textbooks explicitly mention that the majority of kidney stones are made of calcium oxalate crystals, sometimes mixed with calcium phosphate. Advice on preventing kidney stones often includes recommendations about reducing high oxalate foods such as spinach, nuts and certain chocolates in susceptible individuals, which again supports the idea that oxalate plays a key role. This consistent information across health sources confirms calcium oxalate as the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sodium chloride dissolves easily in urine and does not usually precipitate as stones. Magnesium nitrate is not a typical urinary salt and is not emphasised in medical literature on kidney stones. Calcium bicarbonate is more associated with water hardness and can convert to carbonate, but is not described as the main kidney stone material. Ammonium sulphate is used mainly as a fertiliser and does not match the usual composition of kidney stones. Hence, these options are incorrect for the specific question being asked. Common Pitfalls: Students may incorrectly choose calcium bicarbonate or think of calcium carbonate due to familiarity with chalk and water hardness. However, the specific phrase to remember for exams is calcium oxalate stones. Another pitfall is to get distracted by the presence of the word calcium in more than one option without recalling the role of oxalate in stone formation. Linking the term oxalate with common dietary advice for kidney stone patients can help solidify this association in memory. Final Answer: Human kidney stones are most commonly composed of calcium oxalate.

Question 13

A change in which no new substances are formed and the original substance can usually be recovered is called a ___________.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of the basic difference between physical changes and chemical changes in matter. Distinguishing these two types of changes is one of the first conceptual steps in chemistry. A physical change alters the form or appearance of a substance without creating a new substance, while a chemical change produces one or more new substances with different properties. Given Data / Assumptions: The change described does not produce any new substances. The original substance can usually be recovered by simple physical methods. Options include physical change, chemical change, rusting, galvanisation and combustion. We assume standard textbook definitions for these terms. Concept / Approach: A physical change is a change in the physical state, shape, size or appearance of a substance without change in its chemical composition. Examples include melting of ice, boiling of water, dissolving salt in water and breaking a piece of chalk. A chemical change involves a change in composition and formation of new substances, such as rusting of iron, burning of wood or souring of milk. Given that no new substances are formed in the change described, the correct classification is physical change. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that the question clearly states that no new substances are formed. Step 2: Recall that in a physical change, the molecules of the substance remain the same, and only physical properties like shape, size, or state may change. Step 3: Rusting, galvanisation and combustion are all examples of chemical processes in which new substances are formed with different properties from the originals. Step 4: Chemical change is defined as a change where one or more new substances with different chemical composition and properties are produced. Step 5: Since the question specifically excludes the formation of new substances, chemical change and specific chemical processes like rusting, galvanisation and combustion cannot be the correct answers. Step 6: The only option that fits the description is physical change. Verification / Alternative check: Consider examples such as melting ice into water or boiling water into steam. In all these cases, only the state changes; the substance remains H2O. If you freeze the water again, it turns back into ice, showing that the original substance can be recovered. These are physical changes. In contrast, when iron rusts, the reddish brown substance formed is iron oxide, a different compound. You cannot easily get back pure iron from rust by simple physical means, which means rusting is a chemical change. This comparison confirms that the description in the question matches physical change. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chemical change always involves the formation of new substances, which contradicts the condition given. Rusting is a specific example of chemical change involving oxidation of iron. Galvanisation is a chemical process in which a protective layer of zinc is applied to iron to prevent rusting, again involving chemical changes at the surface. Combustion is the burning of substances in oxygen and produces new substances such as carbon dioxide and water. None of these match a change where no new substances are formed. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse physical and chemical changes when the change in appearance is dramatic, such as dissolving or melting. It is important to focus on whether the chemical composition changes. If the process can be reversed by simple physical methods such as cooling, evaporation or filtration, it is likely a physical change. When energy changes, colour changes or gas evolution accompany the formation of new substances, the change is chemical. Keeping this distinction clear helps you avoid errors in classification questions. Final Answer: A change in which no new substances are formed is called a physical change.

Question 14

NaHCO3 is the chemical formula for which common household substance?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question links basic inorganic chemistry with everyday household substances. Many compounds used in kitchens and cleaning products have familiar common names as well as chemical names and formulas. Recognising that NaHCO3 corresponds to baking soda is a standard general science fact that helps in both exams and real life applications such as cooking and neutralising acids. Given Data / Assumptions: Chemical formula given: NaHCO3. We need to match it with a common name. Options include borax, vinegar, lime, baking soda and bleaching powder. We assume standard commercial forms of these substances. Concept / Approach: NaHCO3 is sodium hydrogen carbonate, also called sodium bicarbonate. Its common household name is baking soda, used as a leavening agent in baking and as a mild antacid. Borax is sodium tetraborate, vinegar is a dilute solution of acetic acid, lime usually refers to calcium oxide or calcium hydroxide, and bleaching powder is calcium oxychloride. None of these other names corresponds to NaHCO3. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the formula NaHCO3. Na stands for sodium, H for hydrogen, C for carbon and O3 for three oxygen atoms. Step 2: The IUPAC name of NaHCO3 is sodium hydrogen carbonate or sodium bicarbonate. Step 3: In common language, sodium bicarbonate used in kitchens is called baking soda. Step 4: Examine option D, baking soda, which is the usual name for NaHCO3 found on packets in grocery stores. Step 5: Option A, borax, is sodium tetraborate, usually written as Na2B4O7·10H2O, and is used in cleaning and glass making. Step 6: Option B, vinegar, is a solution of acetic acid CH3COOH in water, not a solid carbonate. Step 7: Option C, lime, refers to calcium oxide or calcium hydroxide, not a sodium salt. Step 8: Option E, bleaching powder, is calcium oxychloride, often written as Ca(OCl)Cl, and is not NaHCO3. Step 9: Thus, NaHCO3 corresponds to baking soda. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify this by recalling common exam lists that pair chemical names with formulas and uses. Baking soda, NaHCO3, is used in baking to produce carbon dioxide gas when it reacts with acids, causing dough to rise. It is also used in antacid tablets to neutralise excess stomach acid. Borax, lime and bleaching powder are usually mentioned in separate contexts, such as cleaning agents, construction materials and disinfectants, with clearly different formulas. This reinforces that NaHCO3 is baking soda. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Borax has a completely different composition and is a borate salt, not a hydrogen carbonate. Vinegar is a liquid acid solution, not a solid salt, and its main component is acetic acid. Lime refers to calcium based compounds and has formulas like CaO or Ca(OH)2. Bleaching powder is a chlorine containing calcium compound and is chemically distinct from sodium hydrogen carbonate. Therefore, none of these can represent NaHCO3. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mix up baking soda (NaHCO3) with baking powder, which is a mixture that usually contains baking soda plus an acid salt and starch. Another confusion is between washing soda, Na2CO3·10H2O, and baking soda, NaHCO3. Washing soda is used in cleaning and water softening, whereas baking soda is mainly used in cooking and as a mild antacid. Remembering the H in NaHCO3 as indicating hydrogen carbonate can help keep these formulas distinct. Final Answer: NaHCO3 is the chemical formula for baking soda.

Question 15

What is the correct chemical formula of ammonium nitrate, a commonly used nitrogenous fertiliser?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on the formula of ammonium nitrate, an important inorganic compound used as a nitrogen rich fertiliser and in some industrial applications. Knowing the correct formula is useful in agricultural chemistry, environmental studies and general science examinations that test familiarity with common fertilisers and their compositions. Given Data / Assumptions: We are asked for the chemical formula of ammonium nitrate. Options propose several possible combinations of ammonium and nitrate ions. We assume standard ionic composition where ammonium is NH4+ and nitrate is NO3-. Concept / Approach: Ammonium nitrate is an ionic compound formed from the ammonium cation, NH4+, and the nitrate anion, NO3-. The charges on NH4+ and NO3- are plus one and minus one respectively, so they combine in a one to one ratio to form a neutral compound. Therefore, the formula is NH4NO3. Any formula that suggests different ratios or different ions does not correctly represent ammonium nitrate. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the ions involved. Ammonium ion is NH4+ and nitrate ion is NO3-. Step 2: Ammonium has charge plus one, nitrate has charge minus one. Step 3: To form a neutral ionic compound, one NH4+ ion combines with one NO3- ion. Step 4: Therefore, the formula of the compound is NH4NO3. Step 5: Check option B, NH4NO3, which matches this simple one to one combination. Step 6: Option A, (NH2)2NO3, suggests different ions and does not correspond to ammonium nitrate. Step 7: Option C, NH4(NO3)2, would indicate two nitrate ions per ammonium ion, leading to a net negative charge and not a neutral formula. Step 8: Option D, NH2NO3, does not represent a standard ammonium salt and has incorrect hydrogen count for ammonium. Step 9: Option E, NH4NO2, is ammonium nitrite, which is a different compound with the nitrite ion NO2- instead of nitrate. Verification / Alternative check: Agricultural and chemistry references list ammonium nitrate as NH4NO3, emphasising that it provides nitrogen in both ammonium and nitrate forms, which are usable by plants. The compound is also known from news reports about fertiliser use and storage, always with the same formula. Remembering that ammonium nitrate is the ammonium salt of nitric acid can also help, because nitric acid has formula HNO3, and replacing the hydrogen with ammonium gives NH4NO3. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Formulas such as (NH2)2NO3 or NH2NO3 do not correctly reflect the ammonium ion NH4+. NH4(NO3)2 suggests a doubly charged nitrate combination, which is not typical for a neutral salt. NH4NO2 is a real compound but it is ammonium nitrite, not nitrate, and has different properties and uses. Thus, these alternatives do not meet the requirement of being ammonium nitrate. Common Pitfalls: A common confusion is between nitrate and nitrite ions, NO3- and NO2-. Always check the number of oxygen atoms when writing formulas. Another pitfall is to overcomplicate the formula by adding extra ions or parentheses when a simple one to one pairing is sufficient. Remember that ammonium nitrate is one of the simplest ammonium salts in terms of stoichiometry, with NH4+ and NO3- combining directly. Final Answer: The correct chemical formula of ammonium nitrate is NH4NO3.

Question 16

Which of the following statements about sodium metal is INCORRECT according to basic chemistry of reactive metals?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of the properties of sodium, a highly reactive alkali metal. Group 1 metals have characteristic reactions with air and water and are handled with care in laboratories. You are asked to identify which statement about sodium is incorrect, so you need to recall its classification in the periodic table and its typical reactions. Given Data / Assumptions: Sodium is an element in the periodic table, symbol Na. Options describe its reactivity with oxygen and water, storage method and its classification as metal or non metal. We assume standard school level knowledge of alkali metals. Concept / Approach: Sodium is an alkali metal in group 1 of the periodic table. It is soft, silvery and highly reactive. It reacts vigorously with water to produce sodium hydroxide and hydrogen gas, releasing heat. It also reacts with oxygen in air to form oxides or peroxides. Because of its reactivity, sodium is stored under kerosene to keep it away from air and moisture. Therefore, any statement claiming that sodium is a non metal is incorrect, since it is clearly a metal by both physical and chemical properties. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that sodium belongs to group 1 (alkali metals) and is therefore a metal. Step 2: Think about the reaction of sodium with water: 2Na + 2H2O → 2NaOH + H2. This reaction is vigorous and exothermic, confirming that sodium reacts strongly with water and generates significant heat. Step 3: Sodium also reacts readily with oxygen in air to form sodium oxide or sodium peroxide, again showing high reactivity. Step 4: Because it reacts with air and moisture, sodium metal is stored in kerosene or mineral oil to protect it from accidental reaction, so the statement about storage in kerosene is correct. Step 5: Sodium oxide is a basic oxide, which supports the statement that sodium forms basic oxides. Step 6: The only statement that contradicts basic facts is the claim that sodium is a non metal. Step 7: Therefore, the incorrect statement is It is a non-metal. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify sodium's metallic nature by physical properties: it has metallic lustre, conducts electricity and is malleable and ductile, although soft. In the periodic table, it clearly appears among metallic elements. Chemistry texts classify sodium as a typical metal that forms ionic compounds such as sodium chloride and sodium hydroxide. This overwhelming evidence confirms that describing sodium as a non metal is wrong. Why Other Options Are Wrong: In this question, wrong options mean statements that are actually correct and therefore cannot be chosen as incorrect. Sodium does react vigorously with oxygen and water, producing a lot of heat. It is indeed stored in kerosene, a standard safety precaution. It forms basic oxides, such as sodium oxide, which react with water to give a strong base. These statements are consistent with the known behaviour of sodium and are not incorrect descriptions. Common Pitfalls: One possible source of confusion is mixing up the properties of sodium with those of non metals such as phosphorus or sulphur, which have very different behaviour. Another pitfall is to misread the question and forget that it is asking for the incorrect statement instead of the correct one. Always pay attention to words like correct, incorrect, true, false or not in such questions, since they reverse what you need to select. Final Answer: The incorrect statement about sodium is that it is a non-metal.

Question 17

Which of the following differences between aerobic and anaerobic respiration is INCORRECT?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to basic biology and biochemistry and compares aerobic and anaerobic respiration. These two processes describe how cells release energy from glucose. Aerobic respiration uses oxygen and yields more energy, while anaerobic respiration occurs without oxygen and yields less energy with different end products. The question asks which stated difference is incorrect, so you must know the correct roles of oxygen and the products formed. Given Data / Assumptions: Aerobic respiration involves oxygen and occurs mainly in mitochondria. Anaerobic respiration occurs in the absence of oxygen, in organisms like yeast or in human muscles under strenuous activity. End products differ: aerobic respiration typically produces carbon dioxide and water, while anaerobic pathways may produce ethanol or lactic acid. We assume standard textbook descriptions of glycolysis and subsequent pathways. Concept / Approach: In both aerobic and anaerobic respiration, glucose is first converted to pyruvate by glycolysis. After that, pathways diverge. In aerobic respiration, pyruvate enters mitochondria and is fully oxidised to carbon dioxide and water through the citric acid cycle and electron transport chain, releasing a large amount of energy. In anaerobic respiration, pyruvate is reduced to ethanol and carbon dioxide in yeast, or to lactic acid in muscle cells, with much less energy release. Therefore, any statement that assigns ethanol production to aerobic conditions or water production to anaerobic conditions is incorrect. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine option A: Aerobic respiration takes place in the presence of oxygen, anaerobic respiration in its absence. This is a correct fundamental difference. Step 2: Examine option C: Aerobic respiration releases more energy, anaerobic less. This is also correct, because complete oxidation yields more ATP. Step 3: Examine option D: Aerobic respiration mainly occurs in mitochondria, while anaerobic respiration can occur in yeast cells. This is broadly correct for basic textbooks. Step 4: Examine option E: Aerobic respiration produces carbon dioxide and water, while anaerobic respiration may produce ethanol or lactic acid. This matches standard biology teaching. Step 5: Examine option B: It claims that in aerobic respiration pyruvate is broken down into ethanol and carbon dioxide, and in anaerobic respiration pyruvate is broken down into carbon dioxide and water. Step 6: This reverses the products. Ethanol and carbon dioxide are typical products of anaerobic respiration in yeast, while carbon dioxide and water are products of aerobic respiration. Step 7: Therefore, option B is an incorrect difference and should be selected. Verification / Alternative check: Standard biology diagrams show that in yeast, in the absence of oxygen, pyruvate is converted to ethanol and carbon dioxide, a process called alcoholic fermentation. In human muscle cells under low oxygen conditions, pyruvate is converted to lactic acid. In contrast, in the presence of oxygen, pyruvate enters the mitochondrion and is fully oxidised to carbon dioxide and water. This progression in the presence or absence of oxygen is a very common exam topic, so any statement that swaps these products is clearly wrong. Why Other Options Are Wrong: In this question, wrong options are actually the correct statements, so they cannot be chosen as incorrect. Option A correctly distinguishes the requirement for oxygen. Option C properly describes the difference in energy yield. Option D accurately links aerobic respiration with mitochondria and anaerobic respiration with organisms like yeast. Option E correctly lists carbon dioxide and water as aerobic products and ethanol or lactic acid as typical anaerobic products. Only option B misassigns fermentation products to aerobic conditions and full oxidation to anaerobic ones. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse the detailed pathways and forget which products belong to which type of respiration, especially when learning about fermentation in yeast versus lactic acid formation in muscles. Another pitfall is to read too quickly and miss that the question specifically asks for the incorrect statement. Carefully checking the end products and the role of oxygen for each option helps avoid such mistakes. Final Answer: The incorrect difference is the statement that in aerobic respiration pyruvate is broken down into ethanol and carbon dioxide, while in anaerobic respiration it is broken down into carbon dioxide and water.

Question 18

Which substance is commonly obtained by the evaporation of seawater in salt pans?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question links everyday experience with basic chemistry and natural resources. Many coastal regions produce a common substance by evaporating seawater in shallow pans under the sun. Understanding what remains after water evaporates from seawater helps you connect ideas about solutions, evaporation and crystallisation to real industrial processes. Given Data / Assumptions: Seawater is evaporated in large open pans. The process leaves behind a solid substance that people collect. Options include sugar, iron, salt, steel and petrol. We assume natural seawater with its typical dissolved salts. Concept / Approach: Seawater is a solution containing various dissolved salts, primarily sodium chloride, along with smaller amounts of magnesium, calcium and other ions. When seawater is evaporated, water vapour leaves and the dissolved salts crystallise out. The main product collected from salt pans is common salt, sodium chloride. Therefore, the correct answer is salt, not sugar, metals such as iron or steel, or fuels like petrol. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the composition of seawater. It contains water as the solvent and many dissolved salts, mainly sodium chloride. Step 2: When seawater is placed in shallow pans and exposed to sun and wind, water gradually evaporates. Step 3: As water evaporates, the concentration of dissolved salts increases until they begin to crystallise and separate as solids. Step 4: The primary crystalline solid obtained is common salt (sodium chloride), which is harvested and further purified for use. Step 5: Sugar is obtained from sugarcane or sugar beet, not from seawater. Step 6: Iron and steel are metallic materials produced from iron ore in blast furnaces and steel plants, not by evaporating seawater. Step 7: Petrol is a liquid hydrocarbon mixture refined from crude oil, again unrelated to evaporation of seawater. Step 8: Therefore, the correct answer is salt. Verification / Alternative check: In geography and chemistry lessons, the process of salt making in coastal salt pans is often described. Photographs show large white fields of salt crystals after seawater has evaporated. The collected salt is then transported to refineries. This process is a straightforward example of separation of a solute from a solution by evaporation and crystallisation. No other listed substances are typically associated with this method of production from seawater. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sugar is obtained by extracting and crystallising sucrose from sugarcane juice or beet juice, not from seawater. Iron and steel are produced industrially from ores through smelting and alloying, processes that involve high temperatures and chemical reduction, not simple evaporation. Petrol is refined from crude oil in petroleum refineries. None of these processes involve evaporating seawater in salt pans, so these options cannot be correct. Common Pitfalls: The main risk in such a straightforward question is overthinking and suspecting a trick where none exists. Some students may briefly wonder about minerals other than salt in seawater, but the exam expects the familiar answer common salt. Remember that in basic science questions, simple real life examples like sea salt production are frequently used to illustrate concepts such as solubility and evaporation. Final Answer: By evaporating seawater in salt pans, the substance commonly obtained is salt.

Question 19

Which of the following statements about phosphorus is INCORRECT according to its basic chemical properties?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of the properties of phosphorus, a non metal element with several important allotropes. Phosphorus is known for its reactivity with air and the need for careful storage. The question asks which statement is incorrect, so you must know how phosphorus actually behaves with air and water and where it is placed in the periodic table. Given Data / Assumptions: Element: phosphorus, symbol P. We consider its reactivity and periodic classification. Options describe reactions with water and air, non metallic character, group position and allotropy. We assume standard behaviour of white and red phosphorus at school level. Concept / Approach: Phosphorus is a non metal found in group 15 (group 5A in older notation) of the periodic table. White phosphorus is highly reactive with oxygen in air and can catch fire spontaneously at relatively low temperatures, which is why it is stored under water to prevent contact with air. However, it does not react vigorously with water itself; the water simply acts as a protective medium. Therefore, any statement claiming vigorous reaction with water is incorrect, while statements about non metallic nature, air reactivity and group position are correct. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that phosphorus is classified as a non metal and forms covalent compounds such as phosphoric acid and phosphates. This supports option B as a correct statement. Step 2: Phosphorus, especially white phosphorus, is very reactive with oxygen in air and can ignite at temperatures slightly above room temperature. Hence, it is true that it can catch fire on reacting with air, supporting option C as correct. Step 3: In the periodic table, phosphorus is placed in group 15, along with nitrogen, arsenic and others, so option D is also correct. Step 4: Phosphorus is known to exist in several allotropic forms, including white, red and black phosphorus, so option E is correct. Step 5: Examine option A, which claims that phosphorus reacts vigorously with water. Step 6: In reality, white phosphorus is stored under water to prevent contact with air because it reacts with oxygen, not because it reacts violently with water itself. Step 7: Therefore, the statement that phosphorus reacts vigorously with water is incorrect and should be selected. Verification / Alternative check: Typical school experiments and safety notes state that white phosphorus must be kept under water to avoid accidental ignition in air. If phosphorus reacted vigorously with water, storing it under water would be dangerous, which contradicts laboratory practice. References on non metals and their properties highlight that phosphorus is air sensitive rather than water reactive, confirming that water serves as a protective barrier, not as a reactant in a vigorous reaction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: In this question, wrong options are actually correct statements about phosphorus, so they cannot be selected as incorrect. Phosphorus is indeed a non metal, it does catch fire on reacting with air, and it is correctly placed in group 15 of the periodic table. It also has well known allotropes, including white and red forms. These details align with standard textbook descriptions and are therefore not incorrect statements. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes misunderstand the reason for storing white phosphorus under water and assume that it reacts with water. It is important to distinguish between being protected by water from air and being chemically reactive with water itself. Another pitfall is to confuse properties of phosphorus with those of alkali metals like sodium, which do react vigorously with water. Careful reading of textbook examples for each element helps avoid such mix ups. Final Answer: The incorrect statement is that phosphorus reacts vigorously with water.

Question 20

What is the correct chemical formula for sulphuric acid, the strong dibasic acid of sulphur commonly used in industry and laboratories?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on sulphuric acid, one of the most important industrial chemicals. Knowing its correct chemical formula is essential for writing reactions, doing stoichiometric calculations and understanding acid base chemistry. Sulphuric acid is a strong dibasic acid of sulphur in oxidation state plus six and is widely used in batteries, fertiliser production and chemical manufacturing. Given Data / Assumptions: We are asked for the formula of sulphuric acid. Sulphuric acid is a strong acid and dibasic, meaning it can donate two hydrogen ions. Options include H2SO4, H2SO3, H3SO3, H3SO4 and HSO4. We assume standard nomenclature used in school textbooks. Concept / Approach: Sulphuric acid is the higher oxidation state oxyacid of sulphur compared to sulphurous acid. In sulphuric acid, sulphur has oxidation state plus six and the acid formula is H2SO4. It contains two ionisable hydrogen atoms attached to oxygen, making it dibasic. Sulphurous acid, by contrast, has formula H2SO3 and sulphur in oxidation state plus four. Formulas with three hydrogens would correspond to a tribasic acid, which is not how sulphuric acid is defined at this level. The HSO4 form represents the hydrogen sulphate ion, not the neutral acid. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that sulphuric acid is written as H2SO4 in almost all chemical equations involving this acid. Step 2: It is dibasic, so it must contain two acidic hydrogen atoms, matching the two hydrogens in H2SO4. Step 3: Check oxidation state of sulphur in H2SO4: let sulphur be x, hydrogen is plus one and oxygen is minus two. Step 4: Write the equation for neutrality: 2*(+1) + x + 4*(-2) = 0, which gives 2 + x - 8 = 0, so x = +6. Step 5: This plus six oxidation state agrees with sulphuric acid. Step 6: H2SO3 would give sulphur oxidation state plus four and is known as sulphurous acid, not sulphuric acid. Step 7: H3SO3 and H3SO4 would indicate three acidic hydrogens and are not standard formulas for ordinary sulphur oxyacids taught at this level. Step 8: HSO4 is an anion, hydrogen sulphate, which carries a negative charge and is not the neutral acid. Step 9: Therefore, the correct formula of sulphuric acid is H2SO4. Verification / Alternative check: Industrial chemistry and laboratory safety materials consistently denote sulphuric acid as H2SO4. It is one of the most produced chemicals worldwide. When you balance equations involving acid base neutralisation or dehydration reactions using sulphuric acid, the formula H2SO4 is used. In contrast, H2SO3 appears only in contexts discussing the less stable sulphurous acid and is usually associated with sulphur dioxide in water. This widespread consistency confirms that H2SO4 is the only correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: H2SO3 is sulphurous acid and corresponds to a different oxidation state and different properties. H3SO3 and H3SO4 do not match the typical dibasic nature of sulphuric acid and are not standard simple acids in introductory chemistry. HSO4 is an ion, not a neutral molecular acid. Therefore, these options cannot represent sulphuric acid as described in the question. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse sulphuric and sulphurous acid names due to their similar spelling. A simple memory aid is that sulphuric acid, with the ic ending, is the more oxidised form with more oxygen atoms, H2SO4. Sulphurous acid, with the ous ending, has fewer oxygen atoms, H2SO3. Associating sulphuric acid with strong acid behaviour and heavy industrial use can also help firmly fix H2SO4 in memory. Final Answer: The correct chemical formula of sulphuric acid is H2SO4.

Chemistry Questions