Question 1

In chemistry, what is commonly referred to as dry ice?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Dry ice is a popular term used in everyday life as well as in chemistry, especially for demonstrations involving fog and cooling. It is used as a refrigerant and for creating special effects because it sublimates directly from solid to gas. Knowing what substance dry ice is made from helps link common names to chemical identities and clarifies its physical properties and safety aspects. Given Data / Assumptions: The term dry ice refers to a solid substance used for cooling and producing fog. Options include solid carbon dioxide, solid nitrogen dioxide, solid sulfur dioxide, ordinary ice, and solid ammonia. We assume standard definitions used in chemistry and industry. The focus is on the widely accepted commercial and chemical meaning of dry ice. Concept / Approach: Dry ice is the solid form of carbon dioxide, obtained by compressing and cooling carbon dioxide gas until it liquefies, then allowing it to expand and freeze. It is called dry because it does not melt into a liquid under normal atmospheric pressure but sublimates directly into carbon dioxide gas. Ordinary ice is solid water and becomes liquid on melting, so it does not behave like dry ice. Other gases such as nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide have different solid forms and are not called dry ice in common usage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that dry ice is very cold and creates dense white fog when placed in warm water, used in stage effects and cooling. Step 2: Its chemical identity is solid carbon dioxide, so its formula is CO2 in solid state. Step 3: When dry ice warms, it does not form a liquid at ordinary atmospheric pressure but directly sublimates to carbon dioxide gas. Step 4: This behaviour is why it is called dry ice, since no liquid water is formed, and the surroundings remain dry. Step 5: Solid water, which is ordinary ice, melts to form liquid water, and therefore does not fit this description. Step 6: Nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ammonia have their own solid forms but are not used or named as dry ice in everyday practice. Verification / Alternative check: Commercial suppliers and safety data sheets describe dry ice as solid carbon dioxide used for refrigeration and transport of perishable goods. Chemistry demonstrations that show sublimation of dry ice always explain that the fog seen is water vapour condensing in cold carbon dioxide gas. Reference books and exam guides consistently define dry ice as the solid form of carbon dioxide. These observations confirm that solid carbon dioxide is the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Solid nitrogen dioxide: Nitrogen dioxide is a brown gas that can form dimeric solids, but these are not called dry ice and are not used for common cooling applications. Solid sulfur dioxide: Sulfur dioxide is a gas with a pungent smell and is not sold as dry ice; its solid form is not widely used as a refrigerant. Solid water (ice): Ordinary ice is simply frozen water and melts to liquid, so it does not behave like dry ice and is not given that name. Solid ammonia: Solid ammonia exists at very low temperatures and is not the substance referred to as dry ice in common or industrial usage. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may confuse ordinary ice with dry ice because both are cold solids. Others might guess any gas that sounds familiar without remembering the exact definition. To avoid these mistakes, link the name dry ice firmly with carbon dioxide and recall the key property that it sublimates directly from solid to gas without forming a liquid at normal pressure. Final Answer: Dry ice is the solid form of carbon dioxide.

Question 2

The depletion of the ozone layer in the stratosphere is mainly caused by the release of which substances?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The ozone layer in the stratosphere protects life on Earth by absorbing harmful ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. In the late twentieth century, scientists observed significant thinning of this layer, often described as ozone holes. Understanding which human made substances are primarily responsible for this depletion is important in environmental chemistry and public awareness. This question tests your knowledge of the key chemical culprits. Given Data / Assumptions: The focus is on ozone depletion in the upper atmosphere. Options include nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and sulfur dioxide. We consider their roles based on scientific studies of ozone layer chemistry. The question refers to the main cause of depletion, not general greenhouse effects. Concept / Approach: Chlorofluorocarbons, often abbreviated as CFCs, are stable compounds once used in refrigerants, aerosol propellants, and foam blowing agents. Because they are very stable in the lower atmosphere, they eventually reach the stratosphere, where ultraviolet radiation breaks them down to release chlorine atoms. These chlorine atoms participate in catalytic cycles that destroy ozone molecules. Carbon dioxide and methane are important greenhouse gases but are not the primary agents of ozone depletion. Nitrous oxide and sulfur dioxide have other environmental impacts but are not as directly associated with the observed ozone holes as CFCs. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the ozone layer is located in the stratosphere and filters out much of the Sun ultraviolet radiation. Step 2: Chlorofluorocarbons are human made compounds containing chlorine, fluorine, and carbon that were widely used in refrigeration and aerosols. Step 3: These compounds are inert in the lower atmosphere, so they persist long enough to reach the stratosphere. Step 4: In the stratosphere, intense ultraviolet light breaks CFC molecules, freeing chlorine atoms. Step 5: A single chlorine atom can catalytically destroy many ozone molecules through a chain of reactions, leading to thinning of the ozone layer. Step 6: Therefore, chlorofluorocarbons are identified as the main cause of ozone layer depletion, which led to international agreements to phase them out. Verification / Alternative check: Scientific reports by organisations and the Nobel Prize winning work on ozone layer chemistry specifically highlight CFCs as the main drivers of ozone depletion. The Montreal Protocol, an international treaty, targeted CFCs and related halogenated substances for reduction and replacement. While nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide also interact with atmospheric chemistry, they are primarily discussed in the context of greenhouse warming rather than direct ozone destruction. This strong and specific link between CFCs and ozone loss confirms that chlorofluorocarbons are the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Nitrous oxide: A greenhouse gas and contributor to some chemical reactions in the atmosphere, but not the primary substance responsible for observed ozone holes. Carbon dioxide: The main greenhouse gas discussed in climate change, but it does not catalytically destroy ozone in the same way as chlorine from CFCs. Methane: Another greenhouse gas that can affect atmospheric chemistry, yet it is not identified as the main cause of stratospheric ozone depletion. Sulfur dioxide: Important for acid rain formation and atmospheric aerosols, but not recognised as the chief agent of ozone layer thinning. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse ozone depletion with global warming and therefore select carbon dioxide or methane because these gases are frequently mentioned in environmental discussions. Another error is to choose any gas that sounds industrial. To avoid confusion, remember that ozone depletion is strongly tied to chlorine and bromine containing compounds such as CFCs, whereas global warming is linked primarily with greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane. Final Answer: The depletion of the ozone layer is mainly caused by chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).

Question 3

The coolant most commonly used in household and commercial refrigerators has traditionally been which substance?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Refrigerators work on the principle of heat absorption by a circulating coolant, also called a refrigerant, which evaporates and condenses in a closed cycle. Over the years, different chemicals have been used as refrigerants in household and commercial units. Understanding which substances have traditionally been used helps link basic chemistry with practical applications and environmental issues such as ozone depletion. Given Data / Assumptions: The question refers to the commonly used coolant in refrigerators. Options include ammonia, nitrogen, Freon, oxygen, and helium. We assume typical domestic and commercial refrigerators from the late twentieth century onward. We focus on widely used fluorocarbon refrigerants often grouped under the trade name Freon. Concept / Approach: Freon is a trade name for a family of chlorofluorocarbon and related refrigerants such as CFC 12 and HCFC 22. These compounds have suitable boiling points and thermodynamic properties for refrigeration cycles and were widely used in domestic refrigerators and air conditioners. Ammonia is also used as a refrigerant, especially in large industrial systems, but textbooks often emphasise Freon as the common household coolant. Nitrogen, oxygen, and helium are gases that do not have the correct combination of properties to serve as standard refrigerants in typical refrigerator designs. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that a refrigerator uses a closed loop in which a liquid refrigerant evaporates in the evaporator coils, absorbing heat from the inside compartment. Step 2: The refrigerant is then compressed and condensed in outside coils, releasing heat to the surroundings. Step 3: Freon type compounds such as dichlorodifluoromethane were widely adopted because they are chemically stable, non corrosive, and have suitable boiling points. Step 4: Ammonia has also been used as a refrigerant, especially in industrial setups, but typical school level questions focus on Freon as the standard household coolant. Step 5: Nitrogen, oxygen, and helium are not commonly used as primary refrigerants in domestic refrigerators, since they require special conditions to liquefy and do not match conventional compressor designs. Step 6: Therefore, the correct answer is Freon type refrigerants. Verification / Alternative check: Older refrigerator models and many educational diagrams explicitly label the refrigerant as Freon. Environmental regulations such as those under the Montreal Protocol also refer specifically to phase out of CFC and HCFC refrigerants that were commonly used in refrigerators and air conditioners. While newer systems use alternative refrigerants to reduce ozone depletion and global warming impacts, the historical and textbook standard is Freon. This confirms that Freon type refrigerants are the answer expected in general knowledge chemistry exams. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ammonia: Used in some refrigeration systems, especially industrial plants, but not usually described as the common household refrigerator coolant in basic exams. Nitrogen: Inert gas used for various purposes but not a standard refrigerant in typical domestic units. Oxygen: Reactive gas with safety issues at high concentrations; not used as a refrigerator coolant. Helium: Used in cryogenic and special low temperature systems but not in ordinary kitchen refrigerators. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose ammonia because they have heard of ammonia based refrigerators, or they may pick any gas they recognise. Another mistake is to forget that the term coolant in refrigerators refers specifically to the working fluid in the cooling cycle, not to water or air inside the fridge. Remember that Freon became almost synonymous with refrigerator gas in many countries, making it the standard answer for such questions, even though environmental concerns have led to newer alternatives today. Final Answer: The coolant traditionally used in household refrigerators is a Freon type refrigerant.

Question 4

Which one of the following is an ohmic conductor that obeys Ohm law over a wide range of voltages?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Ohm law states that the current through a conductor is directly proportional to the potential difference across it, provided physical conditions such as temperature remain constant. Materials that follow this linear relationship between voltage and current over a wide range are called ohmic conductors. Identifying examples of ohmic versus non ohmic conductors is important in basic electricity and electronics. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks for an ohmic conductor. Options include germanium, silicon, carbon, silver, and selenium. We assume normal room temperature and typical circuit conditions. We rely on the distinction between metals and semiconductors in their conduction behaviour. Concept / Approach: Metals such as copper, silver, and aluminium typically obey Ohm law reasonably well over a wide range of applied voltages, showing a straight line current voltage graph. In contrast, semiconductors like germanium, silicon, and selenium have nonlinear current voltage characteristics that depend strongly on temperature and applied voltage, so they are considered non ohmic. Carbon in the form of graphite can show approximately ohmic behaviour in some cases, but the most standard textbook example of an ohmic conductor among the options given is a metal such as silver. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that ohmic conductors have a constant resistance, so the ratio of voltage to current remains constant as voltage changes. Step 2: Metals like silver, copper, and aluminium consist of a lattice of positive ions with free electrons that move under an electric field. Step 3: Within ordinary operating ranges, these metals show a linear relation between current and voltage, satisfying Ohm law. Step 4: Semiconductors such as germanium, silicon, and selenium have charge carriers whose numbers and mobility change strongly with voltage and temperature, leading to nonlinear behaviour. Step 5: Graphite is a form of carbon and can be used as a resistor, but variability in structure and temperature effects make it a less clear standard example. Step 6: Among the options, silver metal is clearly an ohmic conductor and is the best answer. Verification / Alternative check: Experiments in physics laboratories often use metallic wires such as nichrome or copper to verify Ohm law by plotting current against voltage and obtaining a straight line graph. Semiconducting diodes made from silicon or germanium show curved current voltage plots, demonstrating non ohmic behaviour. Silver is known as one of the best electrical conductors and behaves like other metals in showing near linear Ohm law behaviour over usual voltage ranges. These observations support the conclusion that silver is an ohmic conductor. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Germanium: A semiconductor with nonlinear current voltage characteristics, used in diodes and transistors. Silicon: The most widely used semiconductor in electronics, showing non ohmic behaviour in devices like diodes and integrated circuits. Carbon (graphite): Can conduct electricity but often shows deviations from ideal Ohm law due to structure and temperature effects; not the standard textbook example. Selenium: A semiconductor used in photoelectric cells and rectifiers, also non ohmic. Common Pitfalls: Students may mistakenly select silicon or germanium because they are familiar from electronics, forgetting that semiconductors rarely show a simple linear relationship between current and voltage. Another pitfall is to think that any conductor is automatically ohmic. To answer correctly, remember that metals are typical ohmic conductors, while semiconductors and many other materials are non ohmic. Silver, as a classic metal, is therefore the correct choice. Final Answer: Silver metal is an ohmic conductor that obeys Ohm law over a wide range of voltages.

Question 5

Magnesium chloride (MgCl2) is readily soluble in which of the following solvents?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Solubility of salts depends on the nature of both the solute and the solvent. Ionic compounds such as magnesium chloride dissociate into ions when dissolved in suitable polar solvents. Recognising which solvent will dissolve such a salt is an important part of understanding solutions in chemistry. This question asks you to identify the medium in which MgCl2 is soluble among several common liquids. Given Data / Assumptions: The solute is magnesium chloride, an ionic compound with formula MgCl2. Options include petrol, acetone, kerosene, water, and liquid nitrogen. We assume typical room temperature conditions. We use the principle that polar solvents dissolve ionic and polar solutes, while nonpolar solvents dissolve nonpolar solutes. Concept / Approach: Magnesium chloride consists of Mg^2 plus and Cl minus ions held together by ionic bonds. Water is a highly polar solvent with a high dielectric constant and is very effective at solvating ions, so ionic salts like MgCl2 are usually soluble in water. Petrol and kerosene are mixtures of nonpolar hydrocarbons and do not dissolve ionic salts well. Acetone is a polar organic solvent but is less effective at dissolving many simple inorganic salts than water. Liquid nitrogen is a cryogenic nonpolar fluid and is not a practical solvent for such salts. Therefore, water is the correct solvent for dissolving magnesium chloride under ordinary conditions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that MgCl2 is ionic and will dissociate into Mg^2 plus and Cl minus ions in a polar solvent. Step 2: Water molecules are polar, with partial positive charge on hydrogen and partial negative charge on oxygen, and can surround ions effectively. Step 3: The strong interaction between water molecules and ions allows water to pull Mg^2 plus and Cl minus away from the crystal lattice and keep them in solution. Step 4: Petrol and kerosene are nonpolar hydrocarbon liquids; they interact weakly with ions and cannot break ionic bonds effectively. Step 5: Acetone is somewhat polar but is not typically used to dissolve simple inorganic salts like magnesium chloride because water performs this task much better. Step 6: Liquid nitrogen is extremely cold and nonpolar, used mainly as a refrigerant, not as a solvent for ionic compounds. Hence, water is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: In laboratory practice, magnesium chloride is usually supplied as a white crystalline solid that dissolves easily in water to form clear solutions. Solubility tables list MgCl2 as highly soluble in water. When students attempt to dissolve table salt or other ionic salts in petrol or kerosene, they observe that the solid remains undissolved, illustrating the principle that like dissolves like. Acetone is more commonly used to dissolve organic compounds, further confirming that water is the natural solvent for MgCl2 in basic chemistry contexts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Petrol: A mixture of nonpolar hydrocarbons; it does not dissolve ionic salts like magnesium chloride. Acetone: Polar organic solvent, but not the standard or most effective solvent for inorganic salts such as MgCl2 in simple experiments. Kerosene: Another nonpolar hydrocarbon liquid, unsuitable for dissolving ionic compounds. Liquid nitrogen: Used for cooling and cryogenics; it is nonpolar and extremely cold, not used as a solvent for routine salt dissolution. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to assume that any liquid might dissolve any solid. Another error is to choose acetone simply because it is sometimes used as a laboratory solvent. To avoid these problems, remember the guiding rule that ionic and polar compounds dissolve best in polar solvents like water. This rule immediately points to water as the solvent that will readily dissolve magnesium chloride. Final Answer: Magnesium chloride is readily soluble in water.

Question 6

Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) is used for purifying drinking water primarily because it acts as which type of agent?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Potassium permanganate is a deep purple compound widely used in chemistry laboratories and in some water treatment practices. When added in small quantities to drinking water, it helps in disinfection and removal of certain impurities. Understanding why it is effective requires basic knowledge of redox reactions and the role of oxidising agents. This question asks you to identify the main property of potassium permanganate that makes it useful for water purification. Given Data / Assumptions: The compound is potassium permanganate, with formula KMnO4. It is used in small doses to help purify drinking water. Options include reducing agent, oxidising agent, sterilising agent, impurity dissolver, and pH buffer. We assume standard school level explanation of its role in oxidising organic matter and micro organisms. Concept / Approach: Potassium permanganate is a powerful oxidising agent in both acidic and neutral solutions. As an oxidising agent, it can accept electrons from other substances, thereby oxidising organic matter, iron, manganese, and micro organisms present in water. This oxidation can inactivate pathogens and convert certain dissolved pollutants into forms that can be removed more easily. Its effectiveness in purifying water is therefore mainly due to its oxidising nature rather than simply acting as a physical steriliser or a solvent for impurities. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that an oxidising agent is a substance that gains electrons in a chemical reaction and causes another substance to lose electrons. Step 2: Potassium permanganate contains manganese in a high oxidation state and readily accepts electrons, being reduced to lower oxidation states. Step 3: When added to water, KMnO4 oxidises various dissolved organic impurities and some micro organisms, contributing to disinfection. Step 4: This oxidative action helps reduce odour and colour and can assist in precipitation of certain metals such as iron and manganese. Step 5: It is not primarily a reducing agent and does not simply dissolve impurities; instead, it chemically transforms them. Step 6: Therefore, the reason potassium permanganate is used for purifying drinking water is that it is a strong oxidising agent. Verification / Alternative check: Water treatment manuals and chemistry textbooks describe potassium permanganate as a powerful oxidant used for pre oxidation, taste and odour control, and control of iron and manganese in water supplies. In redox titrations, KMnO4 is used as a standard oxidising agent, illustrating its strong oxidising ability. The purple colour disappears as it is reduced, which can also serve as an indicator that it has reacted with impurities. These repeated uses in redox contexts confirm that its key property is being an oxidising agent. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A strong reducing agent: The opposite of reality; potassium permanganate is not known as a reducing agent and does not donate electrons in these reactions. A simple sterilising agent without chemical reaction: Disinfection here occurs through oxidation reactions, not by mere physical presence. A substance that dissolves solid impurities: KMnO4 does not act like a detergent; it changes the chemical nature of impurities through oxidation. A pH neutral buffer: Although the solution may have some effect on pH, potassium permanganate is not primarily used as a buffer for maintaining pH. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse oxidising agents with general disinfectants and may select sterilising agent, ignoring that the sterilisation is accomplished specifically by oxidation. Another error is to think that any compound used in water treatment must be a reducing agent or simply a dissolving agent. To avoid such confusion, remember that potassium permanganate is a classic textbook example of a strong oxidising agent used in both analytical chemistry and water purification. Final Answer: Potassium permanganate purifies drinking water primarily because it acts as a strong oxidising agent.

Question 7

In the manufacture of paper, degumming of fibrous raw materials is commonly carried out using which chemical reagent?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Degumming is an important pretreatment step in many industries that use plant based fibres, including the paper and pulp industry. Raw materials such as wood chips, bamboo or agricultural residues contain gums, resins and other non cellulose impurities that must be removed before high quality paper can be made. This question tests awareness of the common chemical used in degumming, which is closely related to basic ideas about alkalis and their ability to break down unwanted organic materials. Given Data / Assumptions: - The context is industrial manufacture of paper from fibrous raw materials. - Degumming means removal of gummy and resinous substances from the raw fibre feedstock. - Options include strong mineral acids, bleaching agents, an alkali and an inert filler. - Typical textbook level description emphasises alkali treatment in pulping and degumming processes. Concept / Approach: Degumming and pulping of plant fibres often rely on alkaline conditions. Caustic soda, or sodium hydroxide, is a strong base that can saponify fats, resins and waxy substances and can also help break down pectins and other gums. This loosens and removes non fibrous components, leaving behind cellulose fibres suitable for paper making. Strong acids like sulphuric acid or nitric acid are more likely to cause excessive hydrolysis of cellulose, which would weaken the fibres rather than gently clean them, so they are not standard degumming reagents in this context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that paper manufacture involves converting raw fibrous material into relatively pure cellulose fibres by removing gums, resins and lignin. Step 2: Note that industrial pulping and degumming frequently use alkaline solutions, especially sodium hydroxide, to break down and dissolve these unwanted components. Step 3: Evaluate sulphuric acid and nitric acid. These strong mineral acids can cause harsh hydrolysis of cellulose and are not typically used alone for controlled degumming of paper raw material. Step 4: Consider bleaching powder. It is mainly used for bleaching and disinfection rather than primary degumming, although it may appear later in the process for whitening pulp. Step 5: Recognise that caustic soda is the standard and widely cited chemical for alkali treatment and degumming of plant fibres, so it is the most appropriate answer. Verification / Alternative check: Textbook descriptions of paper manufacturing usually mention steps like chemical pulping using sodium hydroxide and sometimes sodium sulfide, as in the kraft process. These treatments operate under alkaline conditions to remove lignin and gums. In contrast, bleaching agents such as chlorine compounds or hydrogen peroxide are described in separate bleaching stages, not in the initial degumming step. Industrial safety considerations also favour controlled alkali use over strong mineral acids in large scale fibre processing. These observations support caustic soda as the correct reagent for degumming. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sulphuric acid and nitric acid are powerful acids that would damage cellulose fibres if used aggressively and are therefore not standard degumming agents in paper production. Bleaching powder is used primarily for bleaching and disinfection rather than for dissolving gums and resins from raw fibres. Calcium carbonate is a filler added to finished paper to improve brightness and opacity, not a degumming chemical. Only caustic soda matches the typical role of an alkaline degumming and pulping agent. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes assume that any strong chemical, including powerful acids or bleaching agents, can clean raw materials equally well. This leads to confusion between degumming, pulping and bleaching stages. Another pitfall is forgetting that cellulose must be preserved while impurities are removed, which means the reagent must be strong enough to dissolve gums yet gentle enough to avoid destroying the fibre structure. Remembering that alkalis, especially sodium hydroxide, are central to pulping and degumming helps avoid these errors. Final Answer: In paper manufacture, degumming of fibrous raw materials is commonly carried out using Caustic soda (sodium hydroxide, NaOH).

Question 8

Among the following elements, which one has the lowest melting point at standard atmospheric pressure?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Melting point is a basic physical property that helps compare the thermal stability of elements and compounds. Metals generally have high melting points due to strong metallic bonding, whereas light gases condense and freeze at very low temperatures. This question asks which element among chromium, hydrogen, zinc and silver has the lowest melting point, encouraging students to recall that hydrogen is a light diatomic gas that becomes solid only at extremely low temperatures. Given Data / Assumptions: - Chromium, zinc, silver and copper are typical metals under normal conditions. - Hydrogen at room temperature is a diatomic gas (H2), not a metal. - Melting point refers to the temperature at which a solid becomes a liquid at one atmosphere pressure. - We compare only the relative order of melting points, not exact numerical values. Concept / Approach: Metals such as chromium, zinc, silver and copper have strong metallic bonding and closely packed crystal lattices, which require significant energy to break, resulting in high melting points. In contrast, hydrogen molecules interact only through weak intermolecular forces when in condensed phases. Hydrogen becomes liquid and solid at cryogenic temperatures far below zero degrees Celsius. Therefore hydrogen has a much lower melting point than the given metallic elements, which already exist as solids at everyday temperatures. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the physical state of each element at room temperature. Chromium, zinc, silver and copper are solid metals, whereas hydrogen is a gas. Step 2: Recall that metals typically possess high melting points due to strong metallic bonds and ordered crystal structures. Step 3: Recognise that hydrogen needs extremely low temperatures to solidify, so its melting point is far below that of most metals. Step 4: Understand that chromium, zinc and silver all have melting points hundreds of degrees Celsius above room temperature. Step 5: Conclude that hydrogen has the lowest melting point among the listed elements. Verification / Alternative check: Approximate data confirm this reasoning. The melting points of most structural metals such as chromium and copper are well above one thousand degrees Celsius, while zinc and silver still melt at several hundred to around one thousand degrees Celsius. Hydrogen, by comparison, transitions from solid to liquid at temperatures close to absolute zero on the Kelvin scale. Even without remembering the exact numbers, the fact that hydrogen is a light gas under normal conditions while the others are high melting solids confirms the qualitative comparison. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chromium, zinc and silver all have much higher melting points than hydrogen. They are solids at room temperature and require strong heating to melt. Copper, an additional metal included as a distractor, also has a high melting point and does not compete with hydrogen in this respect. None of these metallic elements can have a lower melting point than a light diatomic gas like hydrogen. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse boiling point and melting point, or they may guess based on which metal they think is softer or more easily deformed. Softer metals do not necessarily have the lowest melting point in a group. Another pitfall is to overlook the stark difference between gases and metals and to focus only on the metals listed. Remembering that gases condense and freeze only at very low temperatures helps quickly identify hydrogen as the element with the lowest melting point in this set. Final Answer: Among the given elements, the one with the lowest melting point is Hydrogen.

Question 9

In corrosion protection of iron, the industrial process of depositing a protective layer of zinc on the surface of iron objects is called ___________.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Preventing rust and corrosion of iron and steel is crucial in construction, transportation and many household applications. One widely used method is to coat iron with a layer of zinc, which protects the underlying metal from contact with moisture and oxygen. This process is known by a specific name in basic metallurgy and materials science, and many general science exams test whether learners can correctly identify it. Given Data / Assumptions: - The process involves depositing a layer of zinc metal on iron or steel surfaces. - The goal is corrosion protection by forming a barrier and providing sacrificial protection. - Options include common physical and chemical processes such as crystallisation and baking. - We assume standard industrial terminology used in school and competitive examinations. Concept / Approach: Coating iron with zinc to prevent corrosion is called galvanisation. In hot dip galvanising, iron or steel objects are cleaned and then dipped into molten zinc, which adheres to the surface. The zinc layer protects the iron both by acting as a physical barrier and by functioning as a sacrificial anode, since zinc is more reactive than iron and will corrode preferentially. Crystallisation, baking, tempering and rusting refer to entirely different processes and do not describe the protective zinc coating method. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the key action in the question, which is depositing a layer of zinc onto iron. Step 2: Recall the name given to the standard process where steel or iron is dipped into molten zinc to form a protective coating. Step 3: Recognise that this process is called galvanisation or galvanizing, widely used for pipes, roofing sheets and structural components. Step 4: Compare other terms: crystallisation refers to formation of crystals from a solution, baking is a heating process in food or ceramics, and tempering is heat treatment of steel, none of which involve applying zinc. Step 5: Conclude that galvanisation is the only term that matches the description of coating iron with zinc to prevent corrosion. Verification / Alternative check: You can check common examples from daily life. Many fences, buckets and roofing sheets are labelled as galvanised iron, indicating that they have been coated with zinc. Textbooks on metals and non metals usually provide diagrams of hot dip galvanising and explicitly state that the process is used to prevent rusting of iron. Rusting itself is the corrosion of iron and is the phenomenon that galvanisation tries to prevent, not the name of the protective process. This repeated exposure in textbooks confirms galvanisation as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Crystallisation deals with purification of solids by forming crystals from solutions and has nothing to do with zinc coatings. Rusting is the slow oxidation of iron that produces hydrated iron oxides and is the problem galvanisation is meant to solve. Baking is a general heating process used mainly in food preparation and some industrial curing steps, not specifically associated with zinc coatings. Tempering is a heat treatment method used to adjust hardness and toughness of steel and does not involve applying zinc. None of these describe the zinc coating method on iron surfaces. Common Pitfalls: A common confusion is between electroplating and galvanisation, since both involve coating metals. Electroplating uses electric current to deposit a metal layer from a solution, whereas hot dip galvanisation uses molten zinc. Another pitfall is mixing up rusting, which is corrosion, with methods used to prevent it. Remembering that galvanised iron refers to zinc coated iron makes it easier to associate the word galvanisation with protective zinc coating processes. Final Answer: The process of depositing a protective layer of zinc on iron is called Galvanisation.

Question 10

Which of the following statements about ductility and the sonorous nature of materials is correct in basic metallurgy?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In general science and basic metallurgy, physical properties such as malleability, ductility and sonorous nature are used to distinguish metals from non metals. Ductility is the ability of a material to be drawn into thin wires, while sonorous materials give a ringing sound when struck. This question checks whether the learner can correctly identify a true statement about the ductility and sonorous properties of some familiar elements. Given Data / Assumptions: - Gold, silver, copper and platinum are well known metallic elements. - Phosphorus, nitrogen and sulphur are typical non metals under normal conditions. - Ductility and sonorous nature are characteristic metallic properties in school level chemistry. - Only one of the given statements is intended to be correct, while others are clearly false for revision purposes. Concept / Approach: Most metals are ductile and malleable, meaning they can be drawn into wires and beaten into thin sheets. Gold, silver, copper and platinum are especially known for their excellent ductility. Non metals like phosphorus, nitrogen and sulphur are brittle (if solid) or gaseous and do not show ductility or a ringing sound when struck. Sonorous behaviour is also typical of metals such as copper and iron, not of non metals. By checking each statement against these basic properties, we can identify the one that correctly describes copper and platinum as ductile metals. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that ductile materials can be drawn into thin wires, a property strongly associated with metals like copper and platinum. Step 2: Evaluate statement A. Gold and silver are actually among the most ductile metals known, so saying they are not ductile is incorrect. Step 3: Evaluate statement B. Phosphorus and nitrogen are non metals; nitrogen is a gas at room temperature and neither element is ductile, so this is false. Step 4: Evaluate statement C. Copper and platinum are both metals and are well known for their ability to be drawn into wires, so this statement accurately reflects ductility. Step 5: Evaluate statements D and E. Sulphur and phosphorus are brittle non metals and not sonorous, and not all metals are brittle. These statements are therefore incorrect. Verification / Alternative check: Practical examples support statement C. Copper wires are used extensively in electrical wiring because copper is both ductile and a good conductor. Platinum wires and thin platinum components are used in laboratory equipment and specialised devices, again demonstrating ductility. On the other hand, gold and silver are used for very thin foils and fine jewellery chains, reflecting their high ductility, contradicting statement A. School experiments with sulphur show that it crumbles easily rather than deforming, and it does not produce a ringing sound, contradicting statement D. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Statement A is wrong because gold and silver are classic examples of ductile metals. Statement B is wrong because phosphorus and nitrogen are non metals and do not exhibit metallic ductility. Statement D is wrong because sulphur and phosphorus are brittle and not sonorous. Statement E is also wrong because many metals, such as copper and aluminium, are not brittle; they are malleable and ductile. Only statement C expresses a correct and precise fact about metallic ductility. Common Pitfalls: Learners may mistakenly think that all metals have exactly the same properties or may confuse ductility with hardness or strength. Some students might also think of phosphorus only in terms of match heads without remembering its non metallic nature. Another common error is to accept negative statements at face value without checking against well known examples like copper wires. Revisiting standard examples of ductile metals and brittle non metals helps to avoid such misunderstandings. Final Answer: The correct statement is that Copper and platinum are ductile metals that can be drawn into wires.

Question 11

When an electric current is passed through a conducting liquid (electrolyte), what kind of change primarily takes place in the liquid?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Passing electric current through liquids is a key idea in electrochemistry and is used in processes like electroplating, extraction of metals and electrolysis of water. Liquids that conduct electricity usually contain ions and are called electrolytes. This question tests whether learners understand that when a current passes through such a conducting liquid, it generally causes a chemical change rather than just a simple physical effect. Given Data / Assumptions: - The liquid mentioned is a conducting liquid, that is, an electrolyte containing ions. - Electric current is passed between electrodes immersed in the liquid. - We are concerned with the main effect on the liquid, not minor secondary effects. - Typical school level examples include electrolysis of acidified water or copper sulphate solution. Concept / Approach: In electrolytes, current is carried by the movement of ions towards oppositely charged electrodes. At the electrodes, these ions either gain or lose electrons, leading to redox reactions. This process is called electrolysis and results in the formation of new substances such as gases (hydrogen or chlorine) or deposited metals (copper, silver). Since new substances are produced, the primary effect inside the liquid is a chemical change or chemical reaction, not just a physical change like heating or simple evaporation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the liquid is a conducting liquid, so it must contain ions that can move under the influence of an electric field. Step 2: Recall that when current passes through an electrolyte, cations move towards the cathode and anions move towards the anode. Step 3: Recognise that at the electrodes, these ions undergo reduction or oxidation, gaining or losing electrons, which produces new chemical species. Step 4: Understand that this process, electrolysis, is essentially a chemical reaction driven by electrical energy. Step 5: Conclude that the primary effect is a chemical reaction producing new substances, not merely a physical change or simple heating. Verification / Alternative check: Consider the electrolysis of acidified water. When current passes through the water containing a small amount of acid, bubbles of hydrogen gas appear at the cathode and bubbles of oxygen gas appear at the anode. These gases are new substances that were not present in gaseous form before the process. Similarly, in a copper sulphate solution electrolysis, copper metal is deposited on the cathode while the concentration of copper ions in the solution changes. Both examples clearly show that chemical changes occur as a result of the passage of current through the liquid. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Galvanisation refers specifically to coating iron with zinc and is not the general term for what happens in any conducting liquid. Evaporation may occur if the solution heats up, but it is not the primary or defining effect of current passing through an electrolyte. Saying only a physical change occurs ignores the formation of new substances at the electrodes. A small temperature rise may happen because of resistance heating, but it is a secondary effect. Therefore, options A, B, C and E do not capture the main chemical nature of the process. Common Pitfalls: A frequent misconception is to think of electric current only in terms of heating effects, like in an electric kettle, and to overlook chemical changes. Another pitfall is to confuse galvanisation and electroplating with all electrochemical processes, even though galvanisation is a specific corrosion protection technique. Students may also think that if they cannot see a colour change in the bulk solution, no chemical change has occurred. Remembering simple electrolysis experiments with visible gas evolution and metal deposition helps to keep the focus on chemical reactions in conducting liquids. Final Answer: When an electric current is passed through a conducting liquid, the primary effect is A chemical reaction producing new substances.

Question 12

Among the following elements, which one has the lowest melting point at standard atmospheric pressure?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding melting point trends helps learners distinguish between metals, non metals and noble gases. Metals and many non metallic solids have relatively high melting points compared to light noble gases, which exist as monatomic gases at room temperature. This question compares the melting points of titanium, sulphur, argon and zinc to identify which element has the lowest melting point, reinforcing the idea that noble gases condense only at very low temperatures. Given Data / Assumptions: - Titanium and zinc are metallic elements that are solid at room temperature. - Sulphur is a non metallic solid under normal conditions. - Argon is a noble gas that exists as isolated atoms in the gaseous state at room temperature. - Standard atmospheric pressure is assumed for comparison of melting points. Concept / Approach: Metals have strong metallic bonding which requires significant energy to break, so they tend to have high melting points. Sulphur forms molecular crystals made of S8 rings and has a moderate melting point but still melts above room temperature. Noble gases like argon are held together in the solid state only by very weak dispersion forces and therefore condense and freeze at temperatures close to absolute zero. Consequently, argon has a much lower melting point than titanium, sulphur or zinc and will be the correct answer in any such comparison. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that titanium and zinc are metals with strong metallic bonds, leading to high melting points. Step 2: Note that sulphur is a non metal that exists as S8 molecules in the solid state and melts at a moderate temperature above room temperature. Step 3: Recognise that argon is a noble gas present as individual atoms in the gas phase under normal conditions. Step 4: Recall that noble gases like argon only solidify at very low temperatures because the forces between their atoms are extremely weak. Step 5: Conclude that argon has the lowest melting point among the elements listed. Verification / Alternative check: Approximate numerical values support this reasoning. Titanium and zinc both have melting points in the hundreds or even more than one thousand degrees Celsius, characteristic of metals. Sulphur melts slightly above one hundred degrees Celsius. In contrast, argon has a melting point far below zero degrees Celsius on the Celsius scale, reaching the solid state only under cryogenic conditions. Even if the exact temperatures are not memorised, knowing that argon is a noble gas while the others are solids at room temperature clearly indicates that argon melts at the lowest temperature. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Titanium is a high melting metal used in aerospace and structural applications and clearly does not have a low melting point. Zinc, though lower melting than some metals, still melts at several hundred degrees Celsius and is used as a coating metal, not a cryogenic solid. Sulphur melts above room temperature and is used in matches and sulphuric acid manufacture, but it is still a solid in ordinary conditions. Magnesium, another metal included as a distractor, also has a relatively high melting point compared with argon. None of these candidates can compete with a noble gas in terms of having the lowest melting point. Common Pitfalls: Students may be tempted to think of sulphur as having a low melting point because it is a non metal and can melt in a laboratory test tube with modest heating. However, they may forget that argon is not a solid at all under normal conditions and reaches the solid state only at extremely low temperatures. Another pitfall is to focus only on metals and compare them among themselves, ignoring the non metallic option. Remembering that noble gases condense last when cooled helps to correctly identify argon as the element with the lowest melting point here. Final Answer: Among the given elements, the one with the lowest melting point is Argon.

Question 13

The atomic number of chlorine is 17. Which of the following elements has an atomic number greater than that of chlorine?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Atomic number is a fundamental concept in chemistry, defined as the number of protons in the nucleus of an atom. It determines the position of an element in the periodic table and its basic chemical identity. This question checks whether learners can recall relative atomic numbers of some common elements and compare them with that of chlorine, whose atomic number is given as 17. Given Data / Assumptions: - Chlorine has atomic number 17, meaning it has 17 protons in its nucleus. - The elements listed are potassium, sulphur, aluminium, phosphorus and magnesium. - Standard periodic table ordering is assumed, with atomic numbers increasing from left to right and top to bottom. - Only one element in the list has an atomic number greater than 17 in basic school level sequences. Concept / Approach: To solve this, we recall or infer the approximate positions of the elements in the periodic table. Sulphur and phosphorus lie close to chlorine in the same period, but they come before chlorine, so their atomic numbers are slightly lower than 17. Aluminium and magnesium are in an earlier period and therefore have even lower atomic numbers. Potassium lies in the next period after argon and has an atomic number of 19. Therefore, among the given options, only potassium has an atomic number greater than that of chlorine. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the atomic numbers around chlorine in the third period are: phosphorus 15, sulphur 16, chlorine 17, argon 18 and potassium 19. Step 2: Identify the atomic number of sulphur as 16, which is less than 17. Step 3: Identify the atomic number of phosphorus as 15, also less than 17. Step 4: Recall that aluminium and magnesium are in the third period but earlier, with atomic numbers 13 and 12 respectively. Step 5: Recognise that potassium is in the next period with atomic number 19, which is greater than 17, and conclude that potassium is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: An alternative approach is to write a short section of the periodic table from sodium to argon. In this row, sodium is 11, magnesium 12, aluminium 13, silicon 14, phosphorus 15, sulphur 16, chlorine 17 and argon 18. Going down to the next period, potassium comes immediately after argon and is assigned atomic number 19. This pattern confirms that aluminium, sulphur, phosphorus and magnesium all have atomic numbers lower than 17, while potassium has a higher atomic number than chlorine. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sulphur has atomic number 16, which is one less than chlorine. Aluminium has atomic number 13, significantly less than 17. Phosphorus has atomic number 15, also lower than chlorine. Magnesium, with atomic number 12, lies even earlier in the table. None of these options meet the condition of having an atomic number greater than that of chlorine. Only potassium, with atomic number 19, satisfies the requirement. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse atomic number with atomic mass, leading them to guess based on relative mass rather than position in the periodic table. Another pitfall is memorising isolated facts about elements without seeing the sequential pattern in the table. Some may remember that sulphur and phosphorus are close to chlorine and assume they must have higher numbers. Using the periodic table sequence and remembering that atomic number increases steadily avoids these errors. Final Answer: The element among the options whose atomic number is greater than that of chlorine is Potassium.

Question 14

Which of the following organic compounds is commonly used as a general anaesthetic agent in medicine?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Anaesthetics are substances used to induce loss of sensation, especially during surgical procedures. In the history of medicine and organic chemistry, certain volatile organic compounds played a major role as general anaesthetic agents. This question asks which compound, among several common organics, is widely known for its use as a general anaesthetic, reinforcing connections between chemistry and medical applications. Given Data / Assumptions: - The options are acetylene, glycol, diethyl ether, ethylene and acetone. - Only one of these is classically known as a widely used general anaesthetic in medical history. - The question refers to general anaesthesia rather than local numbing agents. - We assume standard textbook level historical and practical knowledge of anaesthetic agents. Concept / Approach: Diethyl ether is a highly volatile, flammable organic liquid that was historically one of the first widely used general anaesthetic agents. When administered as vapour mixed with air, it produces a reversible loss of consciousness suitable for surgery. Compounds like acetylene and ethylene are gases with other industrial uses, while ethylene glycol is used as antifreeze and is toxic rather than anaesthetic. Acetone is a common solvent and not used as a general anaesthetic. Therefore, diethyl ether is the correct choice among the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that a general anaesthetic must be able to induce reversible unconsciousness and loss of sensation when administered, often by inhalation. Step 2: Identify diethyl ether as a volatile organic liquid historically used for inhalation anaesthesia in hospitals and operations. Step 3: Evaluate acetylene and ethylene. These are small hydrocarbon gases used primarily as fuel gas and chemical feedstocks, not standard general anaesthetics. Step 4: Consider glycol (ethylene glycol), which is used as antifreeze in automobile radiators and is toxic if ingested, making it unsuitable as an anaesthetic agent. Step 5: Note that acetone is an important solvent in laboratories and industry, but its properties are not those of a safe general anaesthetic. Conclude that diethyl ether is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Medical and chemistry histories frequently mention the introduction of ether anaesthesia in the nineteenth century as a major breakthrough in surgery. Demonstrations of ether anaesthesia are often cited as key events in medical progress. While modern anaesthesia now uses more sophisticated agents, school level texts still highlight diethyl ether as the classical example of a general anaesthetic from organic chemistry. None of the other listed substances receive similar treatment in standard textbooks as general anaesthetics, which confirms the choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Acetylene is primarily used as a fuel gas in oxyacetylene welding and cutting and is not a standard anaesthetic. Ethylene glycol is poisonous and used as antifreeze, making it unsuitable for medical anaesthesia. Ethylene is a plant hormone and industrial feedstock but not a common human anaesthetic agent. Acetone is a widely used solvent and cleaning agent, not a general anaesthetic. Only diethyl ether historically fits the description of a commonly used general anaesthetic agent among these compounds. Common Pitfalls: Students may be tempted to choose ethylene or acetylene because they are gases and might seem suitable for inhalation, without recalling their actual uses and safety profiles. Another pitfall is to think that any volatile organic solvent, such as acetone, could function as an anaesthetic, overlooking toxicity and side effects. Remembering the classical role of ether in surgical anaesthesia helps to distinguish diethyl ether from other organic liquids and gases in this context. Final Answer: The organic compound commonly used as a general anaesthetic agent is Diethyl ether.

Question 15

Cinnabar, a naturally occurring sulphide mineral with the formula HgS, is an important ore of which metal?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In metallurgy and general chemistry, it is important to know common ores of different metals. Ores are minerals from which metals can be extracted economically. Cinnabar is a well known bright red mineral, and recognising the metal associated with it is a standard examination point in general knowledge and chemistry questions. This question asks which metal is obtained from cinnabar, whose chemical formula is HgS. Given Data / Assumptions: - The ore mentioned is cinnabar, with formula HgS (mercury sulphide). - Options include metals such as lead, manganese, molybdenum, mercury and copper. - We assume basic familiarity with common metal ores listed in school textbooks. - Only one metal in the options is typically associated with HgS as its primary ore. Concept / Approach: Cinnabar is the chief ore of mercury. It consists mostly of mercury sulphide, HgS. When cinnabar is heated in air, the sulphur combines with oxygen to form sulphur dioxide, and mercury is released as vapour, which is then condensed to liquid metal. Other metals such as lead, manganese, molybdenum and copper have their own characteristic ores, like galena for lead or chalcopyrite for copper. None of these match the formula HgS, so the correct association is between cinnabar and mercury. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that cinnabar is a red mineral whose chemical composition is mercury sulphide, HgS. Step 2: Recognise that the presence of Hg in the formula indicates that the metal involved is mercury. Step 3: Remember that in extraction processes, cinnabar is roasted in air, converting sulphur to sulphur dioxide and leaving mercury, which is distilled and condensed. Step 4: Evaluate the options. Lead is usually obtained from ores such as galena (PbS), while copper comes from ores like chalcopyrite and malachite, not from HgS. Step 5: Conclude that cinnabar is an ore of mercury, making mercury the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Standard chemistry textbooks list common metal ores in tables or summaries. Under mercury, cinnabar (HgS) is almost always mentioned as the chief or most important ore. Under lead, galena (PbS) is listed, while manganese is associated with ores such as pyrolusite and molybdenum with molybdenite. Copper has a different set of ores, such as chalcopyrite and cuprite. Revisiting such tables confirms that cinnabar is firmly linked with mercury and is not used as a primary ore for the other metals mentioned. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Lead is mainly extracted from galena, not from cinnabar. Manganese ores include minerals like pyrolusite, not mercury sulphide. Molybdenum is obtained from molybdenite and related minerals. Copper comes from various ores including chalcopyrite and malachite, not from HgS. None of these metals are extracted from cinnabar in basic metallurgical practice, so they do not answer the question correctly. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mix up different sulphide ores because many are coloured and share the sulphide suffix. Another pitfall is to focus only on the colour of the mineral and associate it with metals that form other red or brown compounds, such as iron or copper, without remembering the specific formula HgS. Memorising a small set of the most important ores and their formulas, such as cinnabar for mercury and galena for lead, helps avoid such confusion in multiple choice questions. Final Answer: Cinnabar (HgS) is an important ore of Mercury.

Question 16

In basic organic chemistry, aldehydes (compounds of the form R-CHO) are best described as which type of redox agent in typical reactions?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Aldehydes are an important class of organic compounds characterised by the formyl group R-CHO. Understanding their redox behaviour is crucial in organic reaction mechanisms and in qualitative tests such as Tollens test and Fehling test. This question focuses on whether aldehydes are better described as oxidising agents or reducing agents, and whether their reducing ability is strong or mild under common laboratory conditions. Given Data / Assumptions: - Aldehydes have the general formula R-CHO, with a carbonyl group at the end of a carbon chain. - In many reactions, aldehydes are oxidised to carboxylic acids or their derivatives. - The question asks about their role as redox agents, not their exact products. - Standard school level examples include reactions with Tollens reagent, Fehling solution and other oxidising agents. Concept / Approach: A substance that is readily oxidised, losing electrons in the process, acts as a reducing agent because it causes other reagents to be reduced. Aldehydes are easily oxidised to carboxylic acids in the presence of mild oxidising agents, such as Tollens reagent or Fehling solution. In these reactions, aldehydes reduce silver ions to metallic silver or copper ions to copper oxide. Because aldehydes undergo oxidation readily and drive the reduction of metal ions, they are considered strong reducing agents in many test reactions. They are not classed as oxidising agents, and their reducing behaviour is more pronounced than that of many other organic compounds. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that aldehydes are oxidised to carboxylic acids in the presence of oxidising agents such as potassium permanganate or chromium based reagents. Step 2: Recognise that in qualitative tests like Tollens test, an aldehyde reduces silver ions in the reagent to a shiny silver mirror on the inner wall of the test tube. Step 3: Understand that because the aldehyde is easily oxidised while reducing another species, it functions as a reducing agent. Step 4: Note that aldehydes undergo such oxidations readily even with relatively mild oxidising agents, reflecting a strong reducing tendency. Step 5: Conclude that aldehydes are best described as strong reducing agents among the options provided. Verification / Alternative check: Consider Fehling test, where an aldehyde reduces blue copper(II) ions in solution to orange red copper(I) oxide precipitate, again showing its reducing action. Ketones, by contrast, generally do not give these tests because they are more resistant to oxidation under similar conditions. The fact that aldehydes are singled out in classical organic analysis as giving positive silver mirror and Fehling reactions confirms that they readily reduce these reagents. Textbooks summarising the properties of aldehydes explicitly refer to them as good or strong reducing agents, providing further evidence for the classification in this question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Aldehydes are not mild or strong oxidising agents; instead they are the species that get oxidised themselves, causing reduction of others. Calling them mild reducing agents understates how readily they react in standard oxidation tests that specifically exploit their strong reducing ability. The statement that aldehydes are neither oxidising nor reducing agents ignores well known qualitative tests. Therefore, options A, B, D and E do not correctly reflect the behaviour of aldehydes in common redox reactions. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse the role of the oxidising reagent with that of the organic compound under test. They may see that a strong oxidising agent such as permanganate is used and mistakenly think that the aldehyde must be an oxidising agent as well. Another pitfall is to associate the term strong reducing agent only with inorganic substances like hydrogen gas or metal hydrides and forget that organic compounds like aldehydes can also act strongly as reducing agents. Clear thinking about which species gains or loses electrons in a reaction helps to avoid such confusion. Final Answer: In typical organic redox reactions, aldehydes are best described as Strong reducing agents.

Question 17

Among the following forms of carbon, which one is a good conductor of electricity?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Carbon exists in several allotropes and related forms, each with distinct physical properties. Electrical conductivity is a key property that varies dramatically between these forms. While most non metallic forms of carbon are poor conductors or insulators, one allotrope in particular conducts electricity quite well and is used in electrodes and brushes. This question asks which form of carbon is a good conductor, reinforcing the link between structure and electrical behaviour. Given Data / Assumptions: - The options are graphite, diamond, peat, charcoal and lampblack. - Graphite and diamond are pure allotropes of carbon with different crystal structures. - Peat, charcoal and lampblack are carbon rich materials, often amorphous or impure. - We focus on bulk electrical conductivity at room temperature. Concept / Approach: Graphite has a layered structure in which each carbon atom is bonded to three others in a hexagonal plane, leaving one electron per atom delocalised over the layer. These delocalised electrons can move freely along the layers, allowing graphite to conduct electricity. Diamond has each carbon atom bonded to four neighbours in a three dimensional network, with all electrons tightly bound in sigma bonds, making it an insulator. Peat, charcoal and lampblack are largely amorphous, contain impurities and do not show good metallic type conductivity. Therefore, graphite is the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that graphite is an allotrope of carbon with a layered structure and delocalised electrons in each layer. Step 2: Understand that these delocalised electrons can move under an applied potential difference, giving graphite good electrical conductivity along the planes. Step 3: Contrast this with diamond, where each carbon forms four strong covalent bonds in a three dimensional network, leaving no free electrons for conduction. Step 4: Recognise that peat, charcoal and lampblack are amorphous carbon rich materials that may be somewhat conductive but are not classified as good conductors in textbook comparisons. Step 5: Conclude that among the options, graphite is the best and most widely recognised electrical conductor. Verification / Alternative check: Practical uses confirm this reasoning. Graphite rods are commonly used as electrodes in dry cells and electrolytic cells because they conduct electricity and are chemically relatively inert. Brushes in electric motors also use graphite because it makes good electrical contact while being soft enough not to damage metal commutators. Diamond, on the other hand, is known for hardness and electrical insulating properties, and is used in cutting tools and jewellery rather than as a conductor. Charcoal is used as a fuel and adsorbent but not as a standard electrical conductor in devices, reinforcing graphite as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Diamond is an electrical insulator because all bonding electrons are localised in strong covalent bonds. Peat is partially decomposed plant material with mixed composition and does not act as a good conductor. Charcoal and lampblack are largely amorphous carbon products used mainly as fuels, pigments or adsorbents and are not known for high electrical conductivity. While some forms of amorphous carbon can conduct to a limited extent, they do not match graphite in conductivity, and they are not the standard answer in basic chemistry questions. Common Pitfalls: Students may remember that both graphite and diamond are pure carbon and assume they have similar properties, forgetting how different structures influence conductivity. Another pitfall is to think that any black substance, such as charcoal, must conduct electricity like metals. Understanding that delocalised electrons in graphite layers provide a path for conduction, whereas diamond has no such delocalisation, helps clarify the difference. Visualising graphite as stacked sheets of hexagons can make this easier to remember. Final Answer: The form of carbon that is a good conductor of electricity is Graphite.

Question 18

In safety matches, which chemical substance is mainly used on the specially prepared striking surface of the matchbox?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Safety matches are designed so that they ignite only when rubbed against a specially prepared striking surface, making them safer than older friction matches. The chemistry behind safety matches involves separation of fuel, oxidising agent and an easily ignitable form of phosphorus. This question focuses on which form of phosphorus is used on the striking surface of the matchbox, an idea often highlighted in basic chemistry and general science. Given Data / Assumptions: - The context is modern safety matches, not older white phosphorus based matches. - The match head and the striking surface contain different chemical components. - Options include red phosphorus, white phosphorus, potassium sulphate and sulphur. - The question asks specifically about the substance applied on the striking surface, not in the match head itself. Concept / Approach: In safety matches, the match head typically contains an oxidising agent such as potassium chlorate, together with sulphur or other fuels and binders. The striking surface on the side of the box contains red phosphorus mixed with powdered glass and an abrasive material. When the match is struck, friction converts some red phosphorus to white phosphorus vapour, which ignites and then sets off the oxidising agent and fuel in the match head. White phosphorus is highly toxic and not used as a stable coating. Potassium sulphate and sulphur play other roles and are not the main ingredient on the striking surface in standard descriptions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that safety matches are formulated so that phosphorus is kept separate from the oxidising agent until striking occurs. Step 2: Remember that red phosphorus is a relatively stable, less toxic allotrope used on the striking surface of the matchbox. Step 3: Recognise that when the match is struck, friction converts a small amount of red phosphorus into more reactive white phosphorus, which ignites easily. Step 4: Understand that white phosphorus itself is too reactive and toxic to be used as a stable coating on the outside of matchboxes. Step 5: Conclude that red phosphorus is the correct answer for the substance applied on the striking surface. Verification / Alternative check: Standard school textbooks and general science books describe the composition of safety matches by separating the roles of the match head and the striking surface. They explicitly state that the striking surface contains red phosphorus, powdered glass and glue. This configuration reduces accidental ignition compared with older matches, which used white phosphorus directly in the head and were hazardous. The repeated mention of red phosphorus in this context provides strong support for the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: White phosphorus is very reactive and toxic and is not used as a safe external coating in modern safety matches. Potassium sulphate is a neutral salt and is not the key friction sensitive ingredient on the striking surface. Sulphur is used in the match head as a fuel component rather than on the striking strip. The statement that no option is correct is also wrong because common descriptions clearly identify red phosphorus as the major ingredient on the striking surface of safety matches. Common Pitfalls: A common confusion is to think that phosphorus must be in the match head because that is the part that visibly burns. In safety matches, however, the design intentionally separates red phosphorus onto the box to improve safety. Another pitfall is to mix up red and white phosphorus, forgetting that white phosphorus is the more dangerous allotrope. Remembering the phrase red phosphorus on the striking surface can help keep this detail clear for examinations and practical understanding alike. Final Answer: In safety matches, the substance used on the special striking surface of the matchbox is Red phosphorus.

Question 19

Alcohols such as ethanol are more volatile than water because which physical property of alcohol is lower than that of water?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Volatility refers to how readily a liquid evaporates at a given temperature. More volatile liquids evaporate more quickly and generally have lower boiling points. Alcohols such as ethanol are often described as more volatile than water, which is why the smell of spirit is easily detected and why alcohol based liquids dry quickly. This question asks which physical property of alcohol is lower than that of water that explains this higher volatility. Given Data / Assumptions: - The comparison is between an alcohol, such as ethanol, and water at similar conditions. - Options include boiling point, density, viscosity, surface tension and refractive index. - Volatility is linked to how easily molecules escape from the liquid phase into the vapour phase. - We assume standard atmospheric pressure when discussing boiling points. Concept / Approach: The boiling point of a liquid is the temperature at which its vapour pressure equals the external pressure. Liquids with lower boiling points reach high vapour pressure at lower temperatures and therefore evaporate more readily, making them more volatile. Ethanol has a significantly lower boiling point than water. While density, viscosity and surface tension also differ between alcohol and water, they are not the primary factors directly defining volatility in basic physical chemistry discussions. Thus, the lower boiling point of alcohol compared with water is the key property explaining its higher volatility. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that volatility is associated with how easily a liquid changes into vapour at a given temperature. Step 2: Understand that a liquid with a lower boiling point typically has a higher vapour pressure at room temperature and therefore evaporates more readily. Step 3: Note that ethanol, a common alcohol, boils at a temperature much lower than the boiling point of water. Step 4: Recognise that although alcohol may also differ in density, viscosity and surface tension, these properties are not the main reasons given in school level explanations for its volatility. Step 5: Conclude that the property responsible for higher volatility is the lower boiling point of alcohol compared with water. Verification / Alternative check: An everyday observation supports this idea. Spirits or alcohol based sanitiser on the skin evaporate quickly, giving a cooling sensation, whereas pure water takes longer to evaporate under the same conditions. Data tables list the boiling point of ethanol well below one hundred degrees Celsius, while water boils at one hundred degrees Celsius at one atmosphere pressure. This numerical difference directly reflects the fact that ethanol reaches the necessary vapour pressure for boiling at a lower temperature, confirming that lower boiling point is the key physical property linked to higher volatility. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Density refers to mass per unit volume and does not directly determine how fast a liquid evaporates, though it may influence convection currents. Viscosity measures internal friction or resistance to flow and is more closely related to how a liquid pours than to its tendency to evaporate. Surface tension affects the shape of drops and capillary action, not primarily the volatility. Refractive index concerns how light bends when entering the liquid and has no direct link to evaporative behaviour. Therefore these properties are not the main explanation for alcohol being more volatile than water. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes associate any property that sounds like it influences movement, such as viscosity or surface tension, with volatility without carefully considering definitions. Another pitfall is to treat volatility as a vague concept rather than connecting it to vapour pressure and boiling point. By focusing on the clear relationship between lower boiling point and easier evaporation, learners can understand why ethanol and similar alcohols are more volatile than water. Final Answer: Alcohol is more volatile than water because its boiling point is lower than that of water.

Question 20

Which method will be employed to test the hardness of water?

Accepted Answer

Formation of lather with soap

Chemistry Questions