Question 1

In drinking water treatment, harmful bacteria present in the water cannot be effectively destroyed by which of the following methods?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Safe drinking water must be free from harmful bacteria and pathogens. Water treatment plants and households use several methods to disinfect water, such as chlorination, boiling, and ozonisation. Some substances, however, may change the chemical properties of water without reliably killing microorganisms. This question asks you to identify which method among the given options is not effective for destroying harmful bacteria in drinking water under normal treatment conditions. Given Data / Assumptions: The focus is on harmful bacteria present in drinking water. Methods mentioned include chlorination, boiling, adding caustic soda, and ozonisation. We assume typical practice where methods are applied at reasonable, safe doses for drinking water. The goal is to remove or kill bacteria, not just change taste or hardness. Concept / Approach: Disinfection methods such as chlorination and ozonisation use strong oxidising agents to kill bacteria and viruses. Boiling water raises the temperature to levels that denature bacterial proteins and enzymes, effectively killing most pathogens. Caustic soda, or sodium hydroxide, is a strong base primarily used for pH adjustment or industrial cleaning, not as a standard drinking water disinfectant. Adding caustic soda in practical, safe amounts may not reliably destroy all harmful bacteria, and high doses would make the water unsafe to drink. Therefore, among the options, adding caustic soda is the method that cannot be relied upon to destroy harmful bacteria in drinking water. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider chlorination: chlorine is widely used in municipal water supplies as a disinfectant, so it effectively kills bacteria at recommended doses. Step 2: Consider boiling: heating water to boiling temperature for sufficient time kills most bacteria and pathogens, making it a recommended household practice. Step 3: Consider ozonisation: ozone is a powerful oxidising agent used in advanced water treatment plants to disinfect water. Step 4: Consider caustic soda: while it can raise pH and has cleaning uses, it is not standard for safely disinfecting drinking water. Step 5: Conclude that adding caustic soda is the method that cannot be considered a proper way to destroy harmful bacteria for safe drinking water. Verification / Alternative check: Public health guidelines from organisations and textbooks recommend chlorination, boiling, filtration, ultraviolet treatment, and ozonisation as accepted methods of disinfecting drinking water. They do not recommend adding sodium hydroxide directly to water for disinfection, because it would alter taste, safety, and chemical balance without providing reliable pathogen kill at acceptable concentrations. Industrial cleaning solutions that contain sodium hydroxide are corrosive and not suitable for consumption. Comparing recommended practices with the given options confirms that caustic soda is the odd one out. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chlorination is a standard, proven method for killing bacteria and has been used successfully for many decades in municipal water supplies. Boiling is a simple and effective household method for disinfection, especially during outbreaks or emergencies. Ozonisation is used in modern water treatment plants where advanced technology is available, and it effectively inactivates many microorganisms. These methods do destroy harmful bacteria when properly applied, so they cannot be the correct answer to the question. Common Pitfalls: Students may think that any chemical added to water must kill bacteria, without considering whether it is actually used or safe for drinking water. Another pitfall is to confuse caustic soda with bleaching powder or chlorine compounds, which are genuine disinfectants. To avoid these errors, remember that disinfectants must both kill pathogens and be safe at residual levels for human consumption. Caustic soda fails this test and is not used for routine drinking water disinfection. Final Answer: Harmful bacteria in drinking water cannot be reliably destroyed by adding caustic soda (sodium hydroxide).

Question 2

In the chemistry of safety matches, one of the important phosphorus containing ingredients used in the match composition (on the match head or box side) is which compound?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Safety matches work because the chemicals on the match head and the striking surface react when rubbed together, producing enough heat to ignite the match. Phosphorus compounds play a key role in this mechanism. Understanding which phosphorus compound is commonly used in match compositions is a standard question in general chemistry and everyday science. This question asks you to identify one such compound among several phosphorus based chemicals. Given Data / Assumptions: The context is the chemical composition of safety matches. We are asked about an ingredient of the paste on the match head or striking surface. Options include phosphorus pentoxide, phosphorus trichloride, phosphorus trisulphide, and phosphorus trioxide. We assume typical formulations used in safety matches, not older strike anywhere types. Concept / Approach: In many safety match compositions, phosphorus compounds are used to help initiate ignition when friction is applied. Phosphorus trisulphide, often written as P4S3, has historically been one of the key ingredients used in match heads or related formulations because it ignites relatively easily under friction and participates in redox reactions with oxidising agents like potassium chlorate. Phosphorus pentoxide and phosphorus trioxide are strong oxides used mainly as dehydrating agents or laboratory reagents, while phosphorus trichloride is a reactive liquid used in chemical synthesis, not in matches. Therefore, phosphorus trisulphide is the phosphorus compound most closely associated with safety match composition among the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that safety matches contain a mixture of oxidisers, fuel, binders, and a phosphorus containing compound. Step 2: Recall that phosphorus trisulphide, P4S3, has been widely used in match compositions due to its suitable ignition properties. Step 3: Note that phosphorus pentoxide and trioxide are mainly used as drying or dehydrating agents and are not typical match ingredients. Step 4: Understand that phosphorus trichloride is a corrosive liquid used as a reagent in organic synthesis, not in match pastes. Step 5: Conclude that phosphorus trisulphide fits the description and select it as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Descriptions of match chemistry often mention that early matches used mixtures of oxidisers like potassium chlorate with phosphorus based fuels such as phosphorus trisulphide. Modern safety matches have shifted much of the phosphorus to the striking surface while still relying on similar principles. In contrast, phosphorus pentoxide and phosphorus trioxide are not described as match ingredients in standard references; they are discussed mainly in the context of dehydration and oxidation reactions. Phosphorus trichloride is known as a reagent for making organophosphorus compounds, not as a friction sensitive solid for matches, supporting the choice of phosphorus trisulphide. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Phosphorus pentoxide is a white solid that strongly absorbs water and is used as a dehydrating agent, not as a friction igniting component in matches. Phosphorus trichloride is a toxic, corrosive liquid unsuitable for the solid paste on a matchbox or match head. Phosphorus trioxide is another oxide that does not have the desired ignition characteristics in match compositions. These compounds have important uses in industrial and laboratory chemistry but are not the standard match ingredients asked about in this question. Common Pitfalls: Students may be tempted to choose a compound that simply sounds familiar or looks similar in name without recalling its actual use. Another pitfall is to assume any phosphorus compound can serve the same function in matches, which overlooks differences in physical state and reactivity. To avoid these mistakes, remember that phosphorus trisulphide is specifically mentioned in discussions of match composition and friction ignition. Keeping this association in mind helps you select the correct option quickly in exams. Final Answer: One of the important phosphorus containing ingredients used in safety match composition is phosphorus trisulphide.

Question 3

In plant physiology and photosynthesis, which colours of light in the visible spectrum are absorbed most strongly by green plants for the process of photosynthesis?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Green plants appear green to our eyes because of pigments such as chlorophyll in their leaves. These pigments absorb certain wavelengths of light for photosynthesis while reflecting others. Knowing which colours are absorbed most strongly helps students understand how plants capture solar energy and why leaves look green. This question asks you to identify the parts of the visible spectrum that green plants use most efficiently for photosynthesis. Given Data / Assumptions: The subject is green plants containing chlorophyll as the primary pigment. The visible spectrum includes colours such as red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet. We consider light absorption for photosynthesis, not just visual appearance. Options list combinations of green, yellow, red, and blue light. Concept / Approach: Chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b are the main photosynthetic pigments in green plants. Their absorption spectra show strong absorption peaks in the blue and red regions of the visible spectrum, while absorption is weaker in the green region. Because green light is not absorbed efficiently, it is reflected or transmitted, which is why leaves appear green. Therefore, the colours of light most strongly absorbed and used for photosynthesis are red and blue, not green or yellow. Accessory pigments can absorb additional wavelengths, but the primary strong absorption remains in red and blue. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that chlorophyll containing leaves look green because they reflect green light more than they absorb it. Step 2: Consider the absorption spectrum of chlorophyll, which shows strong peaks in the blue and red regions. Step 3: Recognise that light which is strongly absorbed is more useful for driving photosynthesis. Step 4: Compare the options and identify the combination of red and blue light as the one matching strong absorption regions. Step 5: Choose red and blue light as the correct answer for wavelengths maximally absorbed by green plants. Verification / Alternative check: Experimental studies measuring photosynthesis rates under different coloured lights show that plants photosynthesise most efficiently under red and blue light. Graphs of action spectra, which show how effective different wavelengths are at driving photosynthesis, closely follow the absorption spectra of chlorophyll and peak in red and blue regions. Green light produces lower rates, confirming that it is not the dominant absorbed colour. These data support the conclusion that red and blue light are the main wavelengths absorbed and used by green plants. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Green and yellow light are not maximally absorbed because chlorophyll reflects green and absorbs yellow less strongly than red or blue. Green and red includes red but incorrectly suggests that green is strongly absorbed, which contradicts the observed reflection that makes leaves appear green. Blue and yellow again misses the red region, which is known to be very important for photosynthesis. These combinations do not match the characteristic absorption peaks of chlorophyll pigments in green plants. Common Pitfalls: A common misunderstanding is to assume that because plants look green, they must be using green light the most. In reality, they appear green precisely because green wavelengths are less absorbed and more reflected. Another pitfall is to ignore experimental evidence from absorption and action spectra and rely only on intuition about colour. To avoid these errors, remember the clear result from plant physiology: chlorophyll absorbs mostly red and blue light, which are the main drivers of photosynthesis in green plants. Final Answer: Green plants absorb light most strongly in the red and blue regions of the visible spectrum for photosynthesis.

Question 4

In corrosion and passivation studies, in addition to concentrated nitric acid, which other acid can render iron passive by forming a protective oxide layer on its surface?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Passivation is a phenomenon where a metal becomes less reactive by forming a thin protective oxide layer on its surface. Iron, which normally rusts and corrodes, can become passive in the presence of certain strong oxidising acids. Concentrated nitric acid is a classic example used in textbooks. This question asks you to identify another acid, besides nitric acid, that can make iron passive by forming such a protective film. Given Data / Assumptions: The metal considered is iron, which is normally prone to rusting. The concept is passivation by acid treatment. Options include acetic acid, oxalic acid, chromic acid, and citric acid. We focus on strong oxidising behaviour that can create a protective oxide film. Concept / Approach: Passivating acids are typically strong oxidising agents that react with the metal surface to produce a tightly adherent, protective oxide layer. Concentrated nitric acid is one such acid, and chromic acid, which contains hexavalent chromium species, is another strong oxidising acid. Both can form passive films on iron, reducing its further reaction. Acetic, oxalic, and citric acids are weaker organic acids and do not generally exhibit the same strong oxidising ability needed for passivation of iron. Therefore, chromic acid is the correct choice among the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that passivation of iron involves forming a protective oxide film using an oxidising environment. Step 2: Recognise that concentrated nitric acid is a strong oxidising acid and can render iron passive. Step 3: Identify chromic acid as another strong oxidising acid, containing chromium in a high oxidation state. Step 4: Compare with organic acids like acetic, oxalic, and citric acid, which are weak acids without strong oxidising power. Step 5: Conclude that chromic acid is the acid, besides nitric acid, that can render iron passive and select it as the answer. Verification / Alternative check: Corrosion and surface treatment references mention that iron and some other metals can become passive in strong oxidising environments, such as in concentrated nitric acid or chromic acid solutions. Chromic acid is used in certain metal finishing processes to create protective films, though its use is now restricted in many places due to toxicity concerns. Organic acids like acetic and citric are more commonly used for cleaning or descaling and lack the strong oxidising properties needed for passivation. This comparison confirms chromic acid as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Acetic acid is a weak organic acid found in vinegar and is not a strong oxidising agent; it does not typically passivate iron. Oxalic acid, while capable of forming complexes and sometimes used for cleaning, does not have the strong oxidising ability required to create a stable passive film on iron. Citric acid is another weak organic acid used in food and cleaning applications, again lacking significant oxidising strength. These acids may clean or etch the surface but do not cause true passivation like chromic acid does. Common Pitfalls: Students may choose an acid simply because it is familiar or often mentioned in everyday life, such as acetic or citric acid, without considering its oxidising power. Another pitfall is not remembering that passivation by acids usually involves strong oxidisers rather than weak organic acids. To avoid these mistakes, associate passivation of iron with concentrated nitric acid and chromic acid, both of which can form protective oxide layers under appropriate conditions. This memory aid helps in answering related exam questions correctly. Final Answer: In addition to nitric acid, chromic acid can render iron passive by forming a protective oxide layer on its surface.

Question 5

In Rutherford's famous alpha particle scattering experiment with thin gold foil, the observations were mainly used to draw conclusions about the size and nature of which part of the atom?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Rutherford's alpha scattering experiment is one of the most important experiments in atomic physics. By directing alpha particles at a thin gold foil and observing how they were scattered, Rutherford and his team were able to deduce key features of atomic structure. This experiment showed that atoms are mostly empty space with a small, dense central region. The question asks which part of the atom was primarily studied in terms of its size and characteristics using this experiment. Given Data / Assumptions: The experiment involved alpha particles and a thin metal foil, often gold. Most alpha particles passed straight through, some were deflected at small angles, and a very few were scattered at large angles. The options focus on different atomic parts: nucleus, atom as a whole, electron, and neutron. We use standard interpretations from introductory atomic physics. Concept / Approach: Rutherford interpreted the scattering pattern by proposing that positive charge and most of the mass of the atom are concentrated in a tiny region at the centre, which he called the nucleus. The fact that only a small fraction of alpha particles were deflected at large angles implied that this central region was both very small and very dense. While the experiment also suggested that the atom as a whole is largely empty space, the key quantitative conclusions about size and charge distribution were associated with the nucleus. Electrons and neutrons were not directly observed in this experiment; neutrons had not yet even been discovered. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the main observations: most alpha particles passed through, a few were deflected slightly, and very few were scattered backwards. Step 2: Recognise that backward scattering indicates collision with something very small, massive, and positively charged. Step 3: Understand that Rutherford called this small central region the nucleus. Step 4: Note that from the fraction of large angle scattering events, he estimated that the nucleus is much smaller than the overall size of the atom. Step 5: Conclude that the experiment was primarily related to understanding the size and nature of the nucleus and select nucleus as the answer. Verification / Alternative check: Rutherford's published model of the atom is often described as a planetary model, with electrons orbiting a central nucleus. This model replaced the earlier plum pudding model, in which positive charge was thought to be spread out. The success of the nuclear model in explaining scattering data confirms that the experiment was mainly about locating and characterising the nucleus. Later experiments were needed to study electrons in more detail and to discover neutrons, which were not directly addressed in this scattering study. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Saying the experiment was only about the atom as a whole ignores the key insight that positive charge and mass are concentrated in a small nucleus. Electrons are too light to cause the large angle scattering observed, so their properties were not the focus of the experiment. Neutrons had not yet been discovered at the time of Rutherford's work and did not play a role in his interpretation. Therefore, these options do not accurately reflect the main conclusions drawn from the alpha scattering observations. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes remember that Rutherford concluded atoms are mostly empty space and may incorrectly choose the entire atom as the answer. Another pitfall is to confuse later discoveries, such as neutrons, with the results of this early experiment. To avoid these mistakes, remember that Rutherford's key contribution was the nuclear model of the atom, highlighting a very small, dense, positively charged nucleus surrounded by electrons. This focus on the nucleus is the correct answer to questions about what his experiment primarily revealed. Final Answer: Rutherford's alpha scattering experiment was mainly used to draw conclusions about the size and nature of the nucleus of the atom.

Question 6

In basic nuclear chemistry, nucleons are defined as which combination of subatomic particles present inside the atomic nucleus?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In nuclear chemistry and atomic physics, it is important to distinguish between the different types of subatomic particles that make up atoms. The term nucleons is used frequently when discussing nuclear reactions, mass numbers, and binding energy. This question asks you to recall which specific particles are counted as nucleons and therefore reside in the atomic nucleus, as opposed to orbiting around it. Given Data / Assumptions: Subatomic particles considered: protons, neutrons, and electrons. The term to be defined is nucleons. We focus on the structure of the atomic nucleus. Standard atomic models place electrons outside the nucleus in various energy levels. Concept / Approach: An atom consists of a central nucleus surrounded by electrons. The nucleus contains protons, which are positively charged, and neutrons, which are neutral. Both protons and neutrons are collectively referred to as nucleons because they are the constituents of the nucleus. Electrons, being much lighter and negatively charged, are not included in the term nucleons because they occupy space outside the nucleus. Therefore, nucleons are defined as the combination of protons and neutrons only. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the atomic nucleus is made up of protons and neutrons. Step 2: Remember that electrons move in regions around the nucleus and are not part of the nucleus itself. Step 3: Recognise that the term nucleons is used to describe particles located in the nucleus. Step 4: Combine this information to define nucleons as protons and neutrons together. Step 5: Choose the option that lists protons and neutrons and exclude any option that includes electrons. Verification / Alternative check: In nuclear notation, the mass number A of an atom is defined as the total number of nucleons, meaning the sum of protons and neutrons. Electrons are not counted in the mass number because their mass is negligible compared to that of nucleons. Additionally, nuclear reactions and binding energy discussions focus on the interactions between protons and neutrons inside the nucleus, reinforcing the idea that these two particles are collectively known as nucleons. This usage across textbooks confirms the definition. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Neutrons and electrons together do not define nucleons because electrons are not located in the nucleus. Protons and electrons together simply represent charged particles of opposite sign and again do not match the definition. Including all three particles, protons, neutrons, and electrons, as nucleons is incorrect because electrons are extranuclear particles. These options fail to match the standard scientific meaning of nucleons as the particles that make up the nucleus. Common Pitfalls: Some students confuse the terms nucleons and subatomic particles, thinking that all subatomic particles must be nucleons. Another pitfall is to focus on charge rather than location and assume that any combination of charged and neutral particles could be nucleons. To avoid these misunderstandings, remember that nucleons are specifically those particles that reside in the nucleus, namely protons and neutrons. Keeping this definition clear helps in solving problems involving mass number, isotopes, and nuclear reactions. Final Answer: Nucleons are the subatomic particles found in the nucleus, namely protons and neutrons.

Question 7

In nuclear and radiation chemistry, gamma rays are best described as which type of radiation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Gamma rays are one of the three classic types of radiation discussed in basic nuclear chemistry, along with alpha and beta radiations. Understanding what gamma rays actually are helps students distinguish between particle radiations and electromagnetic radiations, and also explains why gamma rays are highly penetrating and useful in medicine and industry. This question asks you to identify the correct description of gamma rays among several plausible but different types of radiation. Given Data / Assumptions: We are comparing different possible natures of radiation such as electrons, positrons, neutral particles and electromagnetic waves. Gamma rays are known to be emitted from atomic nuclei during radioactive decay. We assume introductory level knowledge of alpha, beta and gamma radiations. The focus is on identifying the physical nature of gamma rays, not their uses or sources. Concept / Approach: Gamma rays are not material particles like alpha or beta radiations. Instead, they are high energy photons, belonging to the electromagnetic spectrum at the very short wavelength, very high frequency end. They are similar in nature to X rays, but usually of even higher energy. The approach is to recall that alpha particles are helium nuclei, beta particles are electrons or positrons, while gamma radiation is a wave form with no rest mass and no electric charge. This property explains their strong penetrating power and their ability to pass through many materials that easily stop alpha and beta particles. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that alpha radiation consists of positively charged helium nuclei, which are heavy particles. Step 2: Remember that beta radiation consists of electrons or positrons, which are light charged particles. Step 3: Recognise that gamma radiation does not carry electric charge and is not a material particle emitted as a stream of matter. Step 4: Gamma rays are high energy photons, which are packets of electromagnetic energy with very short wavelength and very high frequency. Step 5: Therefore, the best description is that gamma rays are high energy electromagnetic waves, not electrons, positrons or slow neutral particles. Verification / Alternative check: Experimental observations support this description. Gamma rays travel at the speed of light and show wave like behaviour such as reflection, refraction and interference, consistent with electromagnetic radiation. They have no measurable rest mass and are unaffected by electric and magnetic fields, unlike charged particles such as electrons or alpha particles. Spectroscopic studies place gamma rays at the extreme high energy end of the electromagnetic spectrum, beyond X rays. These pieces of evidence confirm that gamma rays are high energy photons rather than material particles. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because high energy electrons emitted from the nucleus are beta minus particles, not gamma rays. Option B refers to low energy electrons in atomic shells, which are involved in ordinary electrical conduction, not gamma radiation. Option D describes positrons, which are positively charged particles and form part of beta plus radiation, not gamma rays. Option E suggests slow neutral particles, which does not match the high speed, high energy electromagnetic nature of gamma rays. Only option C correctly states that gamma rays are high energy electromagnetic waves or photons with very short wavelength. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes assume that all nuclear radiations are particle like and may confuse gamma rays with very fast electrons or positrons. Another common mistake is to think of gamma rays as simply stronger X rays without recognising that both are forms of electromagnetic radiation differing mainly in energy and origin. To avoid confusion, remember the pattern: alpha and beta are particles, while gamma is a wave type radiation. Gamma rays have no charge and no rest mass, which is typical of photons. Final Answer: Gamma rays are best described as High energy electromagnetic waves (photons) with very short wavelength, which explains their strong penetrating power and many practical uses.

Question 8

Of the common nuclear radiations listed, which type is most easily stopped by a short distance of air and has the least penetrating power?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In nuclear chemistry and radiation physics, it is very important to compare the penetrating power of different types of radiation. This helps in planning shielding, safety measures and practical uses in medicine and industry. The classic radiations discussed are alpha, beta and gamma rays, alongside X rays. This question asks which of these is most easily stopped by air, meaning it has the lowest penetrating power and shortest range in air under normal conditions. Given Data / Assumptions: The radiations considered are alpha rays, beta rays, gamma rays and X rays, with neutron radiation also listed as an option. We are concerned with how easily each radiation is stopped by a short distance of ordinary air. All radiations are assumed to have typical energies as found in common radioactive sources. No special shielding materials are considered, only air. Concept / Approach: Alpha particles are heavy, doubly positively charged helium nuclei. They interact strongly with matter and lose energy quickly, so they have a very short range in air, often only a few centimetres. Beta particles, which are electrons or positrons, are lighter and more penetrating than alpha particles but can still be stopped by a thin sheet of metal or a few millimetres of plastic. Gamma rays and X rays are high energy electromagnetic waves, far more penetrating and capable of passing through many centimetres of solid material. Neutrons can also penetrate deeply. Therefore, the radiation most easily stopped by air is alpha radiation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that alpha particles are heavy helium nuclei with a +2 charge, giving them strong interactions with air molecules. Step 2: Because alpha particles lose energy rapidly, they travel only a few centimetres in air before being stopped. Step 3: Beta particles are lighter and interact less strongly, so they travel further in air than alpha particles and are not the easiest to stop. Step 4: Gamma rays and X rays are electromagnetic waves with high penetration, passing through air almost unhindered compared with alpha and beta particles. Step 5: Neutrons, although uncharged, can penetrate significant distances before being slowed and captured, so they are not easily stopped by air either. Step 6: Therefore, among the listed radiations, alpha rays are the ones most easily stopped by a short path of air. Verification / Alternative check: Practical demonstrations in physics laboratories show that alpha sources monitored with detectors lose almost all their radiation when a sheet of paper or a few centimetres of air are placed in the path. In contrast, beta radiation passes through paper and requires denser materials such as aluminium for effective shielding. Gamma rays and X rays demand thick lead or concrete for significant attenuation. Radiation protection guidelines consistently rank alpha as the least penetrating and gamma as the most penetrating. These observations support the conclusion that alpha rays are most easily stopped by air. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, beta rays, are more penetrating than alpha rays and cannot be stopped as easily by air alone. Option C, gamma rays, have very high penetrating power and can travel long distances through air. Option D, X rays, are also electromagnetic waves with substantial penetration and require shielding for safety. Option E, neutron radiation, penetrates deeply into materials and is not easily stopped by air. Only option A correctly identifies alpha rays as the radiation type that is most easily stopped by air and has the shortest range. Common Pitfalls: A common misunderstanding is to assume that the radiation that is most dangerous at a distance must also be the hardest to stop. In reality, alpha radiation is extremely damaging if it gets inside the body, but it is very easy to stop externally. Another pitfall is mixing up energy with penetration; a lower energy gamma ray can still penetrate more than a higher energy alpha particle because of their different natures. Remember the simple ranking for penetrating power in air: alpha is least penetrating, followed by beta, with gamma and X rays being the most penetrating. Final Answer: The type of radiation most easily stopped by air is Alpha rays, which have very low penetrating power compared with beta, gamma, X rays and neutrons.

Question 9

In isotopes of a given chemical element, how do the numbers of neutrons in the nuclei compare while the atomic number remains the same?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The idea of isotopes is central to modern chemistry and nuclear science. Isotopes explain why atoms of the same element can have slightly different masses, why some forms are stable and others radioactive, and how techniques such as radiocarbon dating work. This question checks whether you remember the precise definition of isotopes in terms of protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus. Understanding this distinction is also important for interpreting symbols like C 12 and C 14 in nuclear equations and mass spectrometry. Given Data / Assumptions: We are talking about isotopes of the same chemical element. The atomic number, which is the number of protons, defines the element. Neutrons contribute to atomic mass but do not change the chemical identity of the element. We assume a basic understanding of subatomic particles: protons, neutrons and electrons. Concept / Approach: By definition, isotopes are atoms of the same element that have the same number of protons but different numbers of neutrons. Because they have the same number of protons, they have the same atomic number and very similar chemical properties. However, the different neutron counts give them different mass numbers and sometimes different nuclear stabilities. The approach is to recall that the chemical identity is tied to the proton count, while variation in neutron count leads to isotopic forms like hydrogen 1, hydrogen 2 and hydrogen 3. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that the atomic number Z is defined as the number of protons in the nucleus and uniquely identifies the element. Step 2: Recognise that isotopes of a given element must all have the same atomic number, so they all have the same number of protons. Step 3: Understand that the mass number A equals the sum of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. Step 4: For isotopes of the same element, different mass numbers mean different numbers of neutrons, because the proton count is fixed. Step 5: Therefore, the defining feature of isotopes is that the number of neutrons differs while the number of protons remains the same. Verification / Alternative check: Consider hydrogen isotopes as a classic example. Protium has 1 proton and 0 neutrons, deuterium has 1 proton and 1 neutron, and tritium has 1 proton and 2 neutrons. All three have atomic number 1 because they each have one proton, yet they are isotopes due to their differing neutron counts. Similarly, carbon 12 has 6 protons and 6 neutrons, while carbon 14 has 6 protons and 8 neutrons. In each case, the element is the same (hydrogen or carbon), but the neutron number is different, confirming the correct definition. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because if the number of neutrons were the same, the mass numbers would also be the same and the atoms would not be isotopes; they would be identical. Option C incorrectly suggests that both protons and neutrons change together, but changing proton number changes the element itself rather than giving an isotope. Option D is clearly incorrect because many isotopes, especially of heavier elements, contain neutrons, and only the lightest forms like ordinary hydrogen can have zero neutrons. Option E confuses isotopes with ions; ions differ in electron number, while isotopes differ in neutron number. Only option B correctly states that isotopes have different numbers of neutrons while the number of protons stays the same. Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse isotopes with ions or with entirely different elements. Another common mistake is to think that isotopes must always have different numbers of electrons, when in fact a neutral atom of any isotope still has the same number of electrons as protons. To avoid confusion, remember: isotopes differ in neutrons, ions differ in electrons and different elements differ in protons. Keeping these three comparisons clear will help in many nuclear chemistry and atomic structure problems. Final Answer: In isotopes of a given element, The number of neutrons is different while the number of protons stays the same, giving atoms of the same element but with different mass numbers.

Question 10

Which one of the following is not an isotope of hydrogen but instead belongs to a completely different element?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Hydrogen is famous for having three well known isotopes that differ in the number of neutrons but share the same atomic number. These isotopes are important in chemistry, nuclear physics and applications such as heavy water reactors and radiotracers. This question asks you to identify which listed species is not an isotope of hydrogen and instead belongs to a different chemical element. Recognising the names and mass numbers of hydrogen isotopes is basic but very useful knowledge. Given Data / Assumptions: Hydrogen isotopes include protium, deuterium and tritium. The options include three known names along with helium 4 and a general statement option. We assume understanding that hydrogen has atomic number 1 and helium has atomic number 2. Mass numbers are indicated by the number following the element name, such as hydrogen 1 or helium 4. Concept / Approach: Isotopes of an element must share the same atomic number, meaning the same number of protons, and differ only in the number of neutrons. Hydrogen has one proton in the nucleus. Protium, deuterium and tritium all have one proton but differ in neutron count. Helium, however, has two protons and therefore is a different element. A helium nucleus with two protons and two neutrons is helium 4. Since helium has a different atomic number, none of its nuclei can be classified as isotopes of hydrogen. The approach is to check which option corresponds to a nucleus with a proton count other than one. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that protium, hydrogen 1, has 1 proton and 0 neutrons and is an isotope of hydrogen. Step 2: Deuterium, hydrogen 2, has 1 proton and 1 neutron, so it is also an isotope of hydrogen. Step 3: Tritium, hydrogen 3, has 1 proton and 2 neutrons, again clearly an isotope of hydrogen. Step 4: Helium 4 has 2 protons and 2 neutrons, giving it atomic number 2, so it is a helium nucleus and not hydrogen at all. Step 5: Therefore, the species that is not an isotope of hydrogen is helium 4. Verification / Alternative check: Standard nuclear notation writes these isotopes as 1H1 for protium, 1H2 for deuterium and 1H3 for tritium, where the lower left number is the atomic number 1, and the upper left number is the mass number. Helium 4 is written as 2He4, clearly showing atomic number 2. Checking a periodic table confirms that hydrogen and helium occupy different positions and have different proton counts. Since isotopes must share atomic number, helium 4 cannot be considered an isotope of hydrogen. This reinforces helium 4 as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, protium, is the most abundant natural isotope of hydrogen, making up the majority of hydrogen atoms in the universe. Option B, deuterium, is a stable hydrogen isotope found in heavy water and used in nuclear reactors and tracer studies. Option C, tritium, is a radioactive hydrogen isotope used in some luminous devices and fusion research. Option E, which states that all of the listed options are not isotopes of hydrogen, is clearly incorrect because the first three options are indeed hydrogen isotopes. Only option D, helium 4, is not an isotope of hydrogen, since it has a different atomic number and is a completely different element. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes focus only on mass numbers and assume that any nucleus with a small mass number might be hydrogen related. It is crucial to remember that the defining property of an element is its atomic number, which equals the number of protons. Another pitfall is misreading abbreviations such as D and T for deuterium and tritium. Keeping track of both the element symbol and the mass number helps avoid confusion. Always check the proton count to decide whether two nuclei are isotopes of the same element or belong to different elements altogether. Final Answer: The species that is not an isotope of hydrogen is Helium 4, because it has two protons and belongs to the element helium, not hydrogen.

Question 11

The enzyme complex from yeast that converts sugars such as glucose and fructose into ethyl alcohol and carbon dioxide during fermentation is called:

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Fermentation is a key biochemical process used in brewing, wine making and baking. During alcoholic fermentation, microorganisms such as yeast convert sugars like glucose and fructose into ethyl alcohol and carbon dioxide. This transformation is driven by enzymes, which act as biological catalysts. The question asks you to identify the specific enzyme complex from yeast that is directly responsible for converting sugars into alcohol and carbon dioxide, distinguishing it from other enzymes that act on carbohydrates. Given Data / Assumptions: The substrate sugars include glucose and fructose. The products of the reaction are ethyl alcohol (ethanol) and carbon dioxide gas. The enzymes listed in the options include diastase, maltase, invertase, zymase and an unrelated digestive enzyme. We assume basic knowledge of carbohydrate digestion and fermentation. Concept / Approach: Different carbohydrate related enzymes perform different roles. Diastase breaks down starch into simpler sugars, maltase converts maltose into glucose and invertase splits sucrose into glucose and fructose. These enzymes prepare or modify sugars, but they do not themselves convert sugar into alcohol. The enzyme complex that actually catalyses the series of reactions in alcoholic fermentation is zymase, which is found in yeast cells. The approach is to recall which enzyme name is traditionally associated with alcoholic fermentation, as opposed to earlier stages of sugar breakdown. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the reaction described is the conversion of glucose and fructose to ethanol and carbon dioxide, the core of alcoholic fermentation. Step 2: Recall that diastase acts on starch, breaking it into maltose and other smaller sugars, but does not directly produce alcohol. Step 3: Maltase acts on maltose to release glucose molecules and is important in digestion, not directly in alcohol production. Step 4: Invertase hydrolyses sucrose into glucose and fructose, preparing fermentable sugars but again not converting them to alcohol. Step 5: Zymase is the enzyme complex present in yeast that catalyses the conversion of glucose and fructose into ethanol and carbon dioxide in the fermentation pathway. Step 6: Therefore, the correct answer is zymase, which directly carries out alcoholic fermentation. Verification / Alternative check: Historical experiments by biochemists showed that cell free extracts from yeast could ferment sugar to alcohol, and the active component responsible was named zymase. Today we know that zymase is not a single protein but a group of enzymes working together in glycolysis and subsequent steps leading to ethanol formation. Brewing and winemaking textbooks consistently refer to zymase as the yeast enzyme complex that drives alcoholic fermentation. In contrast, diastase, maltase and invertase are usually mentioned when discussing starch digestion and sugar processing, not the final conversion to alcohol. This confirms zymase as the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, diastase, is important in converting starch to maltose but does not produce ethanol. Option B, maltase, converts maltose to glucose, supplying more fermentable sugar, but it is not the enzyme that creates alcohol. Option C, invertase, prepares glucose and fructose from sucrose, again serving as a preliminary step. Option E, pepsin, is a protein digestive enzyme in the stomach and has nothing to do with carbohydrate fermentation. Only option D correctly identifies zymase as the enzyme complex from yeast that converts sugars into ethyl alcohol and carbon dioxide during fermentation. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse enzymes that prepare sugars with those that actually carry out fermentation. Because diastase, maltase and invertase all act on carbohydrates, it is easy to mix up their specific roles. Another pitfall is to think in very general terms and choose any familiar enzyme name rather than focusing on the final step that produces ethanol. To avoid confusion, remember that zymase is historically linked to alcoholic fermentation in yeast, while the other enzymes mainly break down complex carbohydrates into simpler sugars. Final Answer: The enzyme complex that converts glucose and fructose into ethyl alcohol and carbon dioxide during fermentation is Zymase, which catalyses the conversion of sugars to alcohol and carbon dioxide.

Question 12

The pH of pure water at room temperature is nearly 7. For this pH value to increase above 7, which of the following substances must be added to the water?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The pH scale is used to describe how acidic or basic an aqueous solution is. Pure water at room temperature has a pH close to 7 and is considered neutral. Adding acids lowers the pH, while adding bases raises it. Some dissolved substances, however, are neutral and do not significantly change pH. This question asks which listed substance, when added to pure water, will increase the pH above 7, meaning the solution becomes basic or alkaline. Given Data / Assumptions: Pure water has pH approximately equal to 7 at room temperature. We are adding small amounts of various substances and observing the effect on pH. The options include ammonia, cane sugar, common salt, hydrochloric acid and glucose. We assume dilute aqueous solutions, not extreme concentrations or temperatures. Concept / Approach: A base in water produces hydroxide ions or accepts protons, leading to an increase in pH above 7. Ammonia in water acts as a weak base, reacting with water to form ammonium ions and hydroxide ions. Neutral substances such as cane sugar and glucose dissolve without ionising significantly and therefore do not change pH much. Common salt, sodium chloride, is the salt of a strong acid and strong base and produces a nearly neutral solution. Hydrochloric acid is a strong acid and lowers pH when added to water. The correct approach is to identify which substance behaves as a base in aqueous solution and therefore raises the pH. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that ammonia (NH3) in water acts as a weak base, reacting according to NH3 + H2O ⇌ NH4⁺ + OH⁻, which increases hydroxide ion concentration. Step 2: Increased hydroxide ion concentration means a basic solution, so the pH rises above 7. Step 3: Cane sugar is a neutral carbohydrate that dissolves in water but does not release acids or bases; its solution remains close to pH 7. Step 4: Common salt, NaCl, is formed from strong acid HCl and strong base NaOH; its aqueous solution is also nearly neutral, with pH close to 7. Step 5: Hydrochloric acid is a strong acid and will increase the hydrogen ion concentration in water, lowering pH below 7. Step 6: Therefore, only ammonia clearly raises the pH of water above 7 by acting as a base. Verification / Alternative check: Using a pH meter or universal indicator in simple laboratory experiments confirms these effects. A solution of aqueous ammonia gives a pH between 9 and 11 depending on concentration, indicating basic character. Solutions of cane sugar or glucose show pH values close to 7, indicating neutrality. A sodium chloride solution also measures close to pH 7 because the ions do not hydrolyse significantly. A dilute hydrochloric acid solution gives a pH well below 7, often around 1 to 3. These measurements support the conclusion that ammonia is the only option that increases the pH above 7. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, cane sugar, is neutral and does not appreciably change pH. Option C, common salt, is the salt of a strong acid and strong base and gives a nearly neutral solution, not a basic one. Option D, hydrochloric acid, is a strong acid that decreases pH rather than increasing it. Option E, glucose, behaves similarly to cane sugar; it dissolves but does not ionise to produce hydroxide ions and does not increase pH. Only option A, aqueous ammonia, acts as a weak base and raises the pH of pure water above 7. Common Pitfalls: A common confusion is to assume that any dissolved substance, especially salts, must change pH significantly. In reality, only substances that produce or consume hydrogen or hydroxide ions will strongly affect pH. Another pitfall is to forget that weak bases like ammonia can still raise pH even though they do not dissociate completely. Remember that salts of strong acids and strong bases tend to be neutral, while salts involving weak acids or weak bases can produce acidic or basic solutions. For this question, focusing on the behaviour of ammonia in water quickly leads to the correct answer. Final Answer: The pH of pure water increases above 7 when Aqueous ammonia solution, which acts as a weak base is added, because it produces hydroxide ions in solution.

Question 13

Which of the following is an organic molecule, containing carbon bonded to hydrogen in a structure typical of organic chemistry?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Organic chemistry is defined as the study of carbon containing compounds, especially those that have carbon hydrogen bonds and often carbon carbon bonds as well. Many important biomolecules such as sugars, fats, proteins and nucleic acids are organic. At the same time, not every compound that contains carbon is treated as organic in basic chemistry. This question asks you to identify which listed substance is correctly classified as an organic molecule based on its composition and typical treatment in chemistry. Given Data / Assumptions: The options include nitrogen gas, ammonia, fructose, water and sodium chloride. Organic molecules usually contain carbon and hydrogen and belong to families such as carbohydrates, hydrocarbons, alcohols and so on. We assume a basic distinction between organic and inorganic chemistry as taught in school level courses. Fructose is recognised as a simple sugar found in fruits and honey. Concept / Approach: The core idea is that organic compounds are carbon based, typically featuring carbon hydrogen bonds, and often belonging to classes like carbohydrates, lipids or hydrocarbons. Nitrogen gas, water and sodium chloride do not contain carbon at all, so they are clearly inorganic. Ammonia contains nitrogen and hydrogen but no carbon, and is classified as an inorganic compound. Fructose, on the other hand, has the formula C6H12O6, indicating it is a carbon containing molecule with multiple C H and C O bonds, and is classified as an organic carbohydrate. The approach is simply to identify the carbon containing, biologically important molecule among the choices. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine nitrogen gas, N2, which is composed only of nitrogen atoms and contains no carbon, so it is inorganic. Step 2: Consider ammonia, NH3, which has nitrogen and hydrogen but again no carbon atoms, making it an inorganic nitrogen compound. Step 3: Look at fructose, C6H12O6, which clearly contains carbon, hydrogen and oxygen and is a typical sugar found in fruits. Step 4: Recognise that water, H2O, and sodium chloride, NaCl, are both inorganic; water is a simple molecule and sodium chloride is an ionic salt. Step 5: Since fructose is a carbon based sugar with C H bonds and is studied in organic chemistry, it is the organic molecule among the options. Verification / Alternative check: Chemistry textbooks classify carbohydrates such as glucose, fructose and sucrose as organic molecules and study them under organic chemistry and biochemistry. These molecules contain carbon skeletons and are central to metabolism in living organisms. In contrast, nitrogen gas is discussed in inorganic and atmospheric chemistry, ammonia in inorganic and industrial chemistry, water in physical and inorganic chemistry, and sodium chloride as a typical ionic compound. Reviewing chapter headings in standard chemistry books confirms that fructose is covered in the organic chemistry sections, supporting its classification as the organic molecule here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, nitrogen gas, lacks carbon and is not organic. Option B, ammonia, although it contains hydrogen, has no carbon and is therefore inorganic. Option D, water, is a simple inorganic molecule despite its importance for life. Option E, sodium chloride, is an ionic salt composed of a metal and a nonmetal and is clearly inorganic. Only option C, fructose (C6H12O6), is an organic molecule with a carbon backbone typical of carbohydrates. Common Pitfalls: Some learners wrongly assume that any molecule important in life, such as water or ammonia, must be organic. Others think that containing hydrogen is enough to make a molecule organic. The key point is the presence of carbon in a molecular framework with carbon hydrogen or carbon carbon bonds. While some carbon containing compounds like carbon dioxide or carbonates are traditionally treated as inorganic, sugars like fructose are undisputedly organic. Remember that carbohydrates, lipids, proteins and nucleic acids are classic families of organic biomolecules. Final Answer: The organic molecule among the options is Fructose (C6H12O6), a simple sugar carbohydrate, which contains carbon in a typical organic structure.

Question 14

In stoichiometry, one mole of water (H2O) corresponds to what mass of water at the macroscopic scale?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The concept of the mole links the microscopic world of atoms and molecules to the macroscopic world of grams and laboratory measurements. Knowing the molar mass of common substances such as water is essential for solving stoichiometry problems, preparing solutions and understanding chemical equations. This question asks for the mass of one mole of water, H2O, which is a basic but very important numerical fact in introductory chemistry. Given Data / Assumptions: Chemical formula of water: H2O. Approximate atomic mass of hydrogen is 1 gram per mole. Approximate atomic mass of oxygen is 16 grams per mole. We are asked for the molar mass of water expressed in grams per mole, or equivalently the mass of one mole of water in grams. Concept / Approach: The molar mass of a compound is obtained by adding the molar masses of all the atoms in its formula. For water, each molecule contains two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. Therefore, we multiply the molar mass of hydrogen by two and add the molar mass of oxygen. The result gives the mass of Avogadro number of water molecules. The approach is a straightforward application of formula mass calculation using atomic masses from the periodic table. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that the formula H2O indicates two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom in each molecule. Step 2: Take the approximate molar mass of hydrogen as 1 gram per mole. Step 3: Take the approximate molar mass of oxygen as 16 grams per mole. Step 4: Compute the molar mass of water: (2 * 1) + 16 = 2 + 16 = 18 grams per mole. Step 5: Therefore, one mole of H2O corresponds to a mass of 18 grams of water. Verification / Alternative check: Periodic tables often list the atomic mass of hydrogen as about 1.008 and oxygen as about 16.00. Using these more precise values, the molar mass of water is approximately (2 * 1.008) + 16.00 = 18.016 grams per mole, which is usually rounded to 18 grams per mole in introductory problems. This confirms that 18 grams is the correct value to use for one mole of water. Many textbooks and exam papers explicitly quote this value in example calculations, further reinforcing it as standard knowledge. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, 16 grams, would correspond more closely to the molar mass of oxygen alone, not water. Option C, 20 grams, and option D, 22 grams, are higher than the correct value and do not match the sum of atomic masses in H2O. Option E, 24 grams, might suggest two oxygen atoms and two hydrogen atoms, which is not the composition of water. Only option B, 18 grams of H2O, correctly matches the calculation based on 2 hydrogens and 1 oxygen per molecule. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes misread the formula and treat water as HO instead of H2O, leading to incorrect mass calculations. Another common mistake is to forget to multiply the hydrogen atomic mass by two. Additionally, some learners confuse molecular mass with formula mass or misapply atomic masses from memory. To avoid errors, always write down the formula, list each element with its subscript, multiply atomic masses by the subscripts and then sum the results. This systematic approach works for any compound, not just water. Final Answer: One mole of water corresponds to a mass of 18 grams of H2O under standard molar mass conventions.

Question 15

Which of the following samples represents a pure substance rather than a mixture, assuming each sample is chemically pure?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In basic chemistry, it is important to distinguish between pure substances and mixtures. Pure substances have a uniform and definite composition, while mixtures contain two or more substances physically combined. Pure substances can be elements or compounds. This question asks you to evaluate several familiar materials and decide which ones qualify as pure substances, assuming that each sample is not contaminated and contains only the named compound. Given Data / Assumptions: Sample A is table salt consisting only of sodium chloride, NaCl. Sample B is pure water consisting only of H2O molecules. Sample C is zinc oxide, ZnO, in a test tube with no other substances present. We assume that no impurities or additives are mixed with these substances. We use the standard definition of a pure substance as having a fixed, definite composition and uniform properties. Concept / Approach: A pure substance can be an element (such as oxygen gas or copper metal) or a compound (such as sodium chloride, water or zinc oxide). In each case, its composition is fixed and it has characteristic physical and chemical properties. A mixture, in contrast, contains more than one substance and can have variable composition. The approach is to check whether each sample is a single chemical compound or element. If all three are single compounds with fixed formulas, then each one is a pure substance, and the correct answer will state that all are pure subsances under the given assumption. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Table salt, when chemically pure, is sodium chloride with the fixed formula NaCl, making it a compound and therefore a pure substance. Step 2: Pure water, H2O, has a constant composition with two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom in every molecule, so it is also a pure compound. Step 3: Zinc oxide, ZnO, is another compound with fixed stoichiometry, containing zinc and oxygen in a 1:1 ratio, so a test tube of only ZnO is a pure substance. Step 4: None of these samples involve more than one chemical substance mixed together if we assume they are chemically pure. Step 5: Therefore, all three samples represent pure substances rather than mixtures. Verification / Alternative check: If you look up these substances in a chemistry textbook or database, you will find that NaCl, H2O and ZnO each have well defined formulas and properties such as melting point, boiling point and density. Impure table salt used in cooking may contain additives, but the chemical substance sodium chloride is pure. Similarly, distilled water is pure H2O. Laboratory grade zinc oxide is a pure compound. In contrast, mixtures like sea water, air or alloys such as brass involve multiple substances where composition can vary. This confirms that each of the named substances, when pure, qualifies as a pure substance. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A suggests only table salt is a pure substance, ignoring that pure water and pure zinc oxide also meet the definition. Option B, if it existed alone, would wrongly limit purity to water only. Option C focuses only on zinc oxide, leaving out the others. Option E claims that none of the samples are pure substances, which contradicts the standard definitions. Only option D, stating that all of the above samples are pure substances, matches the correct classification when each sample contains just a single chemical compound with fixed composition. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse everyday impure samples with the underlying chemical substances. For example, tap water and cooking salt often contain additives and impurities, so they are mixtures in practice. However, at the chemical level, water and sodium chloride are pure substances when isolated. Another pitfall is to think that only elements are pure substances and that compounds must be mixtures, which is not correct. Remember that both elements and compounds can be pure substances; mixtures are combinations of these in variable proportions. Final Answer: Assuming each sample contains only the named compound, All of the above samples are pure substances, including sodium chloride, pure water and zinc oxide.

Question 16

Which of the following processes is an example of chemical weathering of rocks and minerals at the Earth surface?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Weathering is the process by which rocks and minerals at the Earth surface are broken down into smaller pieces and altered in composition. Chemical weathering involves actual chemical changes in minerals, such as oxidation, hydrolysis and carbonation, rather than just physical breakup. This question asks which of several named processes are examples of chemical weathering, focusing on oxidation, acid rain effects and carbonation. Recognising these processes helps in understanding soil formation, landscape evolution and the impact of pollutants on geological materials. Given Data / Assumptions: Oxidation refers to reaction of minerals with oxygen, often forming oxides or hydroxides. Acid rain contains dissolved acids such as sulfuric and nitric acid from atmospheric pollution. Carbonation involves carbonic acid formed from carbon dioxide and water reacting with minerals. We are asked whether each of these processes is a type of chemical weathering. We assume normal environmental conditions at or near the Earth surface. Concept / Approach: Chemical weathering means that the original minerals undergo chemical reactions that change their composition and often make them more soluble or unstable. Oxidation of iron bearing minerals, such as the conversion of ferrous iron to ferric iron oxides, is a classic example. Acid rain accelerates the dissolution and alteration of rocks by providing stronger acids than natural rainwater. Carbonation involves weak carbonic acid dissolving soluble minerals like calcite. All of these involve chemical reactions, so the approach is to evaluate each process in turn and then see whether they all qualify as chemical weathering. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider oxidation. When oxygen reacts with minerals containing iron, it forms new compounds such as iron oxides and hydroxides, changing the chemical composition of the rock. Step 2: This conversion is a chemical reaction and is therefore a type of chemical weathering. Step 3: Acid rain contains dissolved acids that react with minerals, dissolving them faster than normal rainwater and producing new dissolved ions and secondary minerals. Step 4: Because acid rain involves chemical reactions, its action on rocks is also a form of chemical weathering. Step 5: Carbonation occurs when carbon dioxide dissolves in water to form carbonic acid, which then reacts with minerals such as calcium carbonate in limestone, producing bicarbonate ions and altering the rock. Step 6: This too is a chemical reaction and qualifies as chemical weathering, so all of the listed processes are examples of chemical weathering. Verification / Alternative check: Geology and environmental science textbooks classify oxidation, hydration, hydrolysis and carbonation as major types of chemical weathering. Photographs of red stained rocks show iron oxidation, while illustrations of karst landscapes with caves demonstrate carbonation of limestone. Studies of acid rain impacts on buildings and monuments document accelerated chemical dissolution due to acid deposition. None of these processes simply break rocks physically; they alter the minerals at a chemical level. This confirms that oxidation, acid rain effects and carbonation all fall under the category of chemical weathering. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A mentions only oxidation and ignores the other two valid processes, so it is incomplete. Option B singles out acid rain but does not account for oxidation and carbonation. Option C mentions carbonation alone and leaves out the others. Option E claims that none of the processes involve chemical change, which contradicts the definitions of oxidation, acid reaction and carbonation, all of which are clearly chemical reactions. Only option D correctly states that all of the listed processes are examples of chemical weathering. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse physical weathering, such as freeze thaw cycles and mechanical fracture, with chemical weathering. Physical processes change the size and shape of rock fragments without changing their chemical composition. Another pitfall is to think that only man made processes like acid rain are chemical, while natural processes such as carbonation are physical. In reality, many natural processes involve weak acids and oxidation reactions. Remember that any process that changes the mineral composition by chemical reaction, whether caused by pollution or natural conditions, is chemical weathering. Final Answer: Oxidation, acid rain reactions and carbonation are all examples of Chemical weathering, so the correct choice is that All of the above processes are examples of chemical weathering.

Question 17

Among the atoms listed, which one has the largest atomic radius based on periodic trends: Br, K, Na or Cl?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding trends in atomic radius across the periodic table is a key part of basic chemistry. Atomic size affects many properties, including ionisation energy, electronegativity and bonding behaviour. This question asks you to compare the atomic radii of four elements, bromine, potassium, sodium and chlorine, and identify which one has the largest atomic radius. Recognising how atomic size changes across periods and down groups makes such comparisons straightforward without needing exact numerical data. Given Data / Assumptions: The elements to compare are Br, K, Na and Cl. Sodium and potassium are alkali metals in group 1, with Na in period 3 and K in period 4. We assume atomic radius trends follow the general rules: increases down a group and decreases across a period from left to right. Concept / Approach: Atomic radius generally decreases from left to right across a period because increasing nuclear charge pulls electrons closer, and increases from top to bottom within a group because additional electron shells are added. Alkali metals like sodium and potassium are large atoms compared with halogens in the same period. Potassium lies below sodium in the same group, so it has an extra electron shell and should be larger than sodium. Bromine is larger than chlorine but still a halogen, which are smaller than alkali metals in the same period. The approach is to apply these trends to compare sizes systematically and pick the largest. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Compare sodium and potassium, both in group 1. Potassium is in period 4, below sodium in period 3, so potassium has an extra electron shell and therefore a larger atomic radius than sodium. Step 2: Compare chlorine and bromine, both in group 17. Bromine is in period 4, below chlorine in period 3, so bromine is larger than chlorine. Step 3: In any given period, alkali metals on the left are larger than halogens on the right, because atomic radius decreases from left to right across a period. Step 4: Therefore, in period 3, sodium is larger than chlorine, and in period 4, potassium is larger than bromine. Step 5: Among sodium and potassium, potassium is larger because it is in the period below and has more electron shells. Step 6: Thus, potassium has the largest atomic radius among Br, K, Na and Cl. Verification / Alternative check: If you look up approximate atomic radii in a data table, you will find values such as: K greater than Na, and Na and K both significantly larger than Cl and Br in their respective periods. Even without exact numbers, periodic trend diagrams clearly show that atomic size increases down each group and decreases from left to right. Visual periodic tables that code atomic radius by circle size also show potassium as one of the larger atoms in the fourth period. These alternative representations confirm that potassium has the largest radius among the listed elements. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, bromine, is larger than chlorine but still smaller than potassium, because halogens are smaller than alkali metals in the same period. Option C, sodium, is larger than chlorine but smaller than potassium due to being in a higher period. Option D, chlorine, is one of the smaller atoms among the four because it is a halogen in period 3. Option E states that all have the same radius, which is incorrect and contradicts well established periodic trends. Only option B, potassium, matches the expected pattern of atomic radii and is the largest among the given atoms. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes misremember the direction of atomic size trends or confuse them with trends for ionisation energy or electronegativity, which move in opposite directions. Another pitfall is to focus only on the number of protons and assume more protons means a larger atom, without considering the effect of additional electron shells and increased nuclear attraction. To avoid confusion, memorise the simple rules: atomic radius increases down a group and decreases from left to right across a period. Applying these rules step by step makes questions like this much easier. Final Answer: The atom with the largest atomic radius among the choices is Potassium (K), which lies in group 1, period 4 and has more electron shells than the others.

Question 18

Ozonolysis of an unknown organic compound gives formaldehyde (HCHO) as one of the carbonyl products. This observation confirms the presence of which structural unit in the original molecule?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Ozonolysis is a powerful reaction in organic chemistry used to determine the position of carbon–carbon double bonds in alkenes. When an alkene is treated with ozone followed by a suitable workup, the double bond is cleaved, and carbonyl compounds such as aldehydes or ketones are formed. By analysing these products, chemists can deduce the original structure of the alkene. This question focuses on the special case where formaldehyde, HCHO, appears as one of the products, and asks what structural fragment must have been present in the original compound. Given Data / Assumptions: The organic compound undergoes ozonolysis and produces formaldehyde as one of the products. Formaldehyde has the formula HCHO, with one carbon atom and one hydrogen directly attached to the carbonyl carbon. Ozonolysis of an alkene splits the carbon–carbon double bond and attaches an oxygen atom to each carbon, forming carbonyl compounds. We assume the original compound contains at least one carbon–carbon double bond. Concept / Approach: When an alkene with a terminal vinyl group –CH=CH2 is cleaved by ozonolysis, the terminal carbon that has two hydrogens becomes formaldehyde, HCHO. For example, CH2=CH–R yields formaldehyde from the CH2 end and an aldehyde or ketone from the other end. Internal double bonds, where neither double bond carbon has two hydrogens attached, cannot produce formaldehyde because they lead to larger aldehydes or ketones. Acetylenic triple bonds behave differently and are not cleaved to give formaldehyde in the same way. Hence, the presence of formaldehyde points strongly to a terminal vinyl group in the original structure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that ozonolysis of an alkene converts the carbon–carbon double bond into two carbonyl groups, one on each carbon of the original double bond. Step 2: For formaldehyde, HCHO, to form, one of the original double bond carbons must become a one carbon aldehyde with two hydrogens attached to that carbon. Step 3: The only way this can happen is if, before ozonolysis, that carbon was part of a –CH2 group at a terminal position in the double bond, as in –CH=CH2 or CH2=CH– fragment. Step 4: Ozonolysis of a compound containing a vinyl group CH2=CH–R leads to HCHO from the terminal CH2 carbon and another carbonyl compound from the CH–R side. Step 5: Therefore, the appearance of formaldehyde as a product confirms that the original molecule contained a terminal vinyl group. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a specific example: propene, CH3–CH=CH2. Ozonolysis of propene yields formaldehyde (from the terminal CH2 carbon) and acetaldehyde (from the CH–CH3 carbon). Likewise, any longer chain alkene with a terminal CH2 group at the double bond end will produce formaldehyde upon ozonolysis. In contrast, internal alkenes such as but 2 ene, CH3–CH=CH–CH3, yield acetaldehyde only and no formaldehyde. Triple bonds, such as in acetylenes, undergo oxidative cleavage to give carboxylic acids or carbon dioxide rather than formaldehyde under typical conditions. These examples support the rule that formaldehyde as a product signals a terminal vinyl group in the starting alkene. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, an acetylenic carbon–carbon triple bond, does not typically give formaldehyde as a major ozonolysis product under standard conditions, and triple bonds behave differently from double bonds. Option B, two ethylenic double bonds, could give various carbonyl fragments, but the key feature needed for formaldehyde is a terminal CH2 group on a double bond. Option D, an isopropyl group, is a saturated branched group and does not itself contain the required terminal double bond. Option E, an internal double bond, cannot produce formaldehyde because neither carbon of an internal double bond is CH2 with two hydrogens attached. Only option C correctly identifies the presence of a terminal vinyl group as the structural unit indicated by formaldehyde formation on ozonolysis. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes memorise that ozonolysis gives aldehydes and ketones but do not link specific products to specific structural fragments. Another mistake is to assume that any double bond might produce formaldehyde, without considering the number of hydrogens on each carbon. To avoid these errors, always map each carbon in the double bond to its possible carbonyl product, keeping track of hydrogen attachments. Remember that a CH2 carbon in a double bond is the only one that can become the one carbon aldehyde formaldehyde, HCHO, upon ozonolysis. Final Answer: The presence of formaldehyde as an ozonolysis product confirms that the original molecule contained A terminal vinyl group (–CH=CH2) in the molecule.

Question 19

What is the molar mass of nitric acid, HNO3, expressed in grams per mole using standard atomic masses?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Molar mass is a basic quantity in chemistry used to convert between moles and grams. For acids such as nitric acid, HNO3, knowing the correct molar mass is essential for preparing solutions of known concentration, performing titrations and solving stoichiometry problems. This question asks you to calculate or recall the molar mass of HNO3 using standard atomic masses from the periodic table and select the correct value from the options provided. Given Data / Assumptions: Chemical formula of nitric acid is HNO3. Approximate atomic mass of hydrogen (H) is 1 g/mol. Approximate atomic mass of nitrogen (N) is 14 g/mol. Approximate atomic mass of oxygen (O) is 16 g/mol. We assume standard atomic masses as used in introductory chemistry calculations. Concept / Approach: To find the molar mass of a compound, we multiply the atomic mass of each element by the number of atoms of that element in the formula and then add all these contributions. For HNO3, there is one hydrogen atom, one nitrogen atom and three oxygen atoms per molecule. The approach is straightforward: compute 1 for hydrogen, 14 for nitrogen and 3 * 16 for oxygen, then sum the results. This gives the mass of one mole of nitric acid molecules in grams. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the elements in HNO3: hydrogen (H), nitrogen (N) and oxygen (O). Step 2: Count the number of each atom in the formula: 1 hydrogen, 1 nitrogen and 3 oxygen atoms. Step 3: Use the approximate atomic masses: H = 1 g/mol, N = 14 g/mol and O = 16 g/mol. Step 4: Compute the total mass contribution: hydrogen contributes 1 * 1 = 1 g/mol, nitrogen contributes 1 * 14 = 14 g/mol and oxygen contributes 3 * 16 = 48 g/mol. Step 5: Add these values: 1 + 14 + 48 = 63 g/mol. Step 6: Therefore, the molar mass of nitric acid, HNO3, is 63 g/mol. Verification / Alternative check: Using more precise atomic masses, such as H = 1.008, N = 14.01 and O = 16.00, the calculation becomes roughly 1.008 + 14.01 + 48.00 = 63.018 g/mol, which rounds to 63 g/mol for typical classroom use. Many reference tables list the molar mass of nitric acid as approximately 63.0 g/mol, confirming the calculation. Industrial data sheets for concentrated nitric acid solutions also use this molar mass in preparing solutions, further verifying the value. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, 53 g/mol, would imply a much lower oxygen contribution and does not match the three oxygens in HNO3. Option C, 48 g/mol, matches only the oxygen contribution but ignores hydrogen and nitrogen, so it is incomplete. Option D, 52 g/mol, does not correspond to any reasonable combination of atomic masses in HNO3. Option E, 73 g/mol, is too high and would require heavier elements or more atoms than are actually present. Only option A, 63 g/mol, corresponds to the correct sum of atomic masses for one mole of nitric acid molecules. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes forget to multiply the oxygen atomic mass by three, treating HNO3 as if it had only one oxygen atom. Another mistake is to confuse HNO3 with other nitrogen oxides or oxyacids like HNO2 or N2O5, leading to incorrect atom counts. To avoid these errors, always write the formula clearly, count each atom carefully and multiply atomic masses by the subscripts. This method works reliably for any compound and helps develop good habits for more complex stoichiometric calculations. Final Answer: The molar mass of nitric acid, HNO3, is 63 g/mol, obtained by adding the contributions of one hydrogen, one nitrogen and three oxygen atoms.

Question 20

Which of the following is a correct property of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as used in laboratory and industry?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Sodium hydroxide, NaOH, also known as caustic soda, is a very important industrial and laboratory chemical. It is widely used in soap making, drain cleaners, chemical manufacturing and as a strong base in titrations. Knowing its physical properties, such as solubility and odor, helps in handling it safely and predicting its behaviour in different solvents. This question asks you to identify a correct property of sodium hydroxide from several statements, some of which are misleading or incorrect. Given Data / Assumptions: Sodium hydroxide is an ionic compound consisting of Na⁺ and OH⁻ ions. Water is a polar solvent, while ether and many organic solvents are nonpolar or weakly polar. Rotten egg smell is associated with hydrogen sulfide gas, not sodium hydroxide. We consider typical laboratory concentrations and conditions. Concept / Approach: NaOH is a strong base that readily dissociates into ions in water. Because water is polar, it stabilises these ions and NaOH is highly soluble, producing a strongly basic solution. On the other hand, nonpolar solvents such as ether do not stabilise ions well, so ionic compounds like NaOH are usually insoluble in such solvents. Sodium hydroxide itself is odourless; any smell in solutions is usually due to other substances. The correct approach is to compare these known facts with each option and select the statement that accurately describes NaOH behaviour. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that NaOH dissolves readily in water, forming Na⁺ and OH⁻ ions and giving a strongly alkaline solution with high pH. Step 2: Ionic compounds like NaOH are generally not soluble in nonpolar solvents such as ether, because there is no strong interaction to stabilise the ions. Step 3: Therefore, the statement that NaOH is highly soluble in water but insoluble in ether and other nonpolar solvents is correct. Step 4: The claim that NaOH is only slowly soluble in water and forms a neutral solution is false; it dissolves quickly and creates a basic solution. Step 5: Rotten egg smell is characteristic of hydrogen sulfide gas (H2S), not sodium hydroxide; NaOH itself has no strong characteristic odor. Step 6: The idea that all the statements are correct or that NaOH is completely insoluble in water contradicts well known experimental facts. Verification / Alternative check: Laboratory handbooks and safety data sheets state that sodium hydroxide pellets or flakes are readily soluble in water, with dissolution being strongly exothermic. When preparing NaOH solutions, chemists add the solid slowly to water because the heat released can cause splattering. In contrast, NaOH does not dissolve in diethyl ether or other nonpolar solvents and is often used in separations precisely because it stays in the aqueous phase. No reputable source describes NaOH as having a rotten egg smell. These references confirm that high solubility in water and insolubility in nonpolar solvents is the correct property. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B is wrong because NaOH dissolves quickly, not slowly, and the resulting solution is strongly basic, not neutral. Option C is incorrect because the rotten egg smell comes from hydrogen sulfide, often produced in reactions involving sulfide ions, but NaOH itself does not smell like rotten eggs. Option D claims all statements are true, which cannot be correct since options B and C are false. Option E, saying NaOH is completely insoluble in water, is the opposite of reality. Only option A accurately describes NaOH as highly soluble in water but insoluble in ether and other nonpolar solvents. Common Pitfalls: A common misunderstanding is to associate any strong or unpleasant laboratory smell with common reagents like NaOH, even when the odor comes from contaminants or reaction products. Another pitfall is to assume that if a substance is insoluble in one solvent, it must be insoluble in all solvents, which ignores the important like dissolves like principle. Remember that ionic compounds dissolve well in polar solvents like water but poorly in nonpolar solvents, while many organic compounds show the opposite behaviour. For sodium hydroxide, its strong ionic character makes it very water soluble and essentially insoluble in ether. Final Answer: A correct property of sodium hydroxide is that It is highly soluble in water but insoluble in ether and other nonpolar solvents, consistent with its ionic nature and strong basicity.

Chemistry Questions