Statement: Should India make efforts to harness solar energy to meet its energy needs? Arguments: I. Yes. Most current energy sources are exhaustible and solar is renewable. II. No. Harnessing solar requires high capital which India lacks. Choose the option that best identifies the strong argument(s).

Introduction / Context:
Energy strategy weighs sustainability, security, and cost curves. Solar is a mainstream renewable option.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Fossil fuels are finite and pollutive.
• Capital costs can be financed via public private models and fall over time.

Concept / Approach:
Identify which argument stands on durable policy logic.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Argument I: Renewable adoption diversifies supply and reduces dependence on exhaustible fuels. Strong.Argument II: High capital is a challenge but not a reason to avoid efforts altogether. Phased investment, concessional finance, and scale learning mitigate costs. Weak.

Verification / Alternative check:
Policy mixes often include incentives, grids, and storage planning which address capital concerns.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only II is negative without solution; either and both misclassify; neither ignores a strong sustainability rationale.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing affordability constraints with policy infeasibility.

Final Answer:
Only Argument I is strong.