Earthwork in railway embankment — prismoidal volume with varying height: A railway embankment 150 m long has formation width 11 m and side slopes 2 horizontal : 1 vertical. Ground falls 1 in 50 along the alignment. Formation falls 1 in 150 (same direction). If height at zero chainage is 0.5 m, compute the earthwork by the prismoidal formula.

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: 3250 m3

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
For linear earthworks with linearly varying cross-sections, the prismoidal formula gives an accurate volume using areas at the two ends and the mid-section. In rail embankments, cross-sectional area depends on height, formation width, and side slope.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Length L = 150 m.
  • Formation width b = 11 m; side slope s = 2 (H:V = 2:1).
  • Ground fall = 1/50; formation fall = 1/150 (same direction).
  • Height at start (x = 0) = h0 = 0.5 m.


Concept / Approach:

Height relative to ground increases with distance at the rate (ground fall − formation fall). Cross-sectional area for an embankment is A = bh + sh^2. Apply the prismoidal formula V = L/6 * (A0 + 4Am + A1).


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Relative rise rate = (1/50 − 1/150) = 0.02 − 0.006667 = 0.013333 per metre.2) Heights: h0 = 0.5 m; h_mid at 75 m = 0.5 + 750.013333 = 1.5 m; h1 at 150 m = 0.5 + 1500.013333 = 2.5 m.3) Areas: A = bh + sh^2 = 11h + 2h^2.A0 = 110.5 + 2*(0.5^2) = 5.5 + 0.5 = 6.0 m².Am = 111.5 + 2(1.5^2) = 16.5 + 4.5 = 21.0 m².A1 = 112.5 + 2(2.5^2) = 27.5 + 12.5 = 40.0 m².4) Prismoidal volume: V = 150/6 * (6 + 421 + 40) = 25 * (6 + 84 + 40) = 25 * 130 = 3250 m³.


Verification / Alternative check:

End-area method gives V ≈ L * (A0 + A1)/2 = 150(6 + 40)/2 = 3450 m³; prismoidal correction subtracts 200 m³ to account for curvature of area-height relation, yielding 3250 m³ as above.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • 3225 and 3275 m³ are near-misses not matching exact prismoidal computation.
  • 3300 m³ is higher; likely based on average area without correction.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Using bh + 2sh^2 instead of bh + s*h^2 (the standard derivation already accounts for both sides).
  • Forgetting the difference of ground and formation gradients when computing height variation.


Final Answer:

3250 m3.

More Questions from Estimating and Costing

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion