Correct metric units in quantity estimation for buildings Select the correct metric unit for the specified quantity when estimating for building works.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Metre for length

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Unit consistency underpins correct quantity takeoff and BOQ preparation. Misstating units causes serious errors in costing, ordering, and measurement. Estimation relies on SI-based metric units for all basic and derived quantities on site.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Standard SI/metric practice in civil estimation.
  • Length, area, volume, mass/weight, and capacity must use correct units.
  • One best answer is expected.


Concept / Approach:
In SI: length → metre (m); area → square metre (m^2); volume → cubic metre (m^3); capacity (fluids) → litre; mass → kilogram (kg) whereas weight (force) → newton (N). Among the options, only one is unambiguously and universally correct without contextual caveats.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Check option (a): length measured in metre → correct.2) Option (b): area is in m^2, not m^3 → incorrect.3) Option (c): volume is in m^3, not m^2 → incorrect.4) Option (d): in engineering, weight is a force; SI unit is newton, not kilogram (kg is mass) → misleading.5) Option (e): litre for capacity is acceptable in practice, but questions of this type typically expect the unequivocal base SI mapping; selecting one, (a) is the safest canonical choice.


Verification / Alternative check:
Cross-check BOQs: plastering measured in m^2, concrete in m^3, rebar mass in kg (mass) but load in N/kN. Only (a) fits without nuance.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Cubic metre for area: wrong dimension.
  • Square metres for volume: wrong dimension.
  • Kilogram for weight: weight is force; SI unit is newton.
  • Litre for capacity: commonly used, but the question expects the single most canonical mapping; hence (a).


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing mass with weight; interchanging area and volume units; ignoring that capacity (litre) is derived and context-dependent.


Final Answer:
Metre for length

More Questions from Estimating and Costing

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion