Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Make him realize his mistake (calm confrontation with facts).
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question probes emotional regulation, conflict resolution, and ethical leadership. A measured response preserves dignity, clarifies boundaries, and allows for correction while protecting yourself from future harm.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Best practice is to confront privately with specifics, seek an explanation, establish consequences, and decide future engagement based on accountability and restitution. The approach balances fairness and self-protection.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Gather and present facts calmly, avoiding accusatory language.2) Ask for their perspective; differentiate misunderstanding from intent.3) Request corrective action/restitution and set clear boundaries.4) Decide on the relationship based on their ownership and behavior change.
Verification / Alternative check:
Constructive confrontation tends to produce either resolution (apology/restoration) or clarity for disengagement, both preferable to retaliation.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Immediate breakup (a) may be premature without dialogue; retaliation (b) is unethical and escalatory; gossip (d) harms reputations and reduces chances of resolution; ignoring (e) invites repeat harm.
Common Pitfalls:
Explosive reactions, public shaming, or allowing the issue to fester without closure.
Final Answer:
Calmly confront with facts to make the person realize and correct the mistake.
Discussion & Comments