Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The statement lists positives but blames unspecified “constraints” for underperformance. We must avoid inventing which constraints they are.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Both conclusions propose specific bottlenecks, but the premise is non-specific. Without explicit mention, neither I nor II is compelled. They might be true in reality, yet logical validity demands textual support.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify the missing detail: which constraints? Not provided.2) Hence both proposed specifics are speculative → reject.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option crediting I or II imports outside knowledge.
Common Pitfalls:
Relying on general sector narratives to “fill in” unspecified constraints.
Final Answer:
Neither I nor II follows.
Discussion & Comments