Statement: “The good news is the shows have been postponed, not cancelled. The bad news is the disappointment of fans and the thousands of pounds lost.” — Mr. X on two mega Bollywood shows being postponed Conclusions: I. Thousands of viewers were preparing to watch the shows. II. The shows were to be organised in the UK.
-
Aif only conclusion I follows
-
Bif only conclusion II follows
-
Cif either I or II follows
-
Dif neither I nor II follows
-
ENone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: if only conclusion I follows
Explanation
Introduction / Context:The speaker contrasts postponement (not cancellation) with fan disappointment and “thousands of pounds lost.” We test which inference is necessary.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- There are “fans” who are disappointed — implying substantial expected attendance.
- There are monetary losses denominated in “pounds.”
- Venue location is not explicitly stated.
Concept / Approach:Fan disappointment plus financial loss around “mega” shows reasonably implies a large audience was gearing up, satisfying I. The currency “pounds” hints at the UK but is not conclusive (other jurisdictions and accounting can also use GBP; sponsorship/settlements may be GBP-denominated irrespective of venue).
Step-by-Step Solution:1) I: “fans” + “thousands of pounds lost” around mega shows → strong evidence of large prepared audience → I follows.2) II: Currency reference alone does not prove UK location → II does not necessarily follow.
Verification / Alternative check:Had the statement said “in London” or “UK tour,” II would follow; it does not.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Only II / Either / Neither: each ignores the explicit “fans” clue indicating significant expected viewership.
Common Pitfalls:Treating currency denomination as venue proof.
Final Answer:if only conclusion I follows