Statement:\n“The good news is the shows have been postponed, not cancelled. The bad news is the disappointment of fans and the thousands of pounds lost.” — Mr. X on two mega Bollywood shows being postponed\nConclusions:\nI. Thousands of viewers were preparing to watch the shows.\nII. The shows were to be organised in the UK.

Introduction / Context:
The speaker contrasts postponement (not cancellation) with fan disappointment and “thousands of pounds lost.” We test which inference is necessary.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• There are “fans” who are disappointed — implying substantial expected attendance.
• There are monetary losses denominated in “pounds.”
• Venue location is not explicitly stated.

Concept / Approach:
Fan disappointment plus financial loss around “mega” shows reasonably implies a large audience was gearing up, satisfying I. The currency “pounds” hints at the UK but is not conclusive (other jurisdictions and accounting can also use GBP; sponsorship/settlements may be GBP-denominated irrespective of venue).

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) I: “fans” + “thousands of pounds lost” around mega shows → strong evidence of large prepared audience → I follows.2) II: Currency reference alone does not prove UK location → II does not necessarily follow.

Verification / Alternative check:
Had the statement said “in London” or “UK tour,” II would follow; it does not.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only II / Either / Neither: each ignores the explicit “fans” clue indicating significant expected viewership.

Common Pitfalls:
Treating currency denomination as venue proof.

Final Answer:
if only conclusion I follows