Conclusion I does not follow because removal of on indiscipline students does not provide a reasonable solution to the problem. Conclusion II is not related to the statement. Hence, both the conclusion do not follow.
Conclusion I and II convey almost the same meaning that principles related to Ethics and Morality seem to be good but are not practicable in real life. Hence, both the conclusion follow.
Both the conclusion follow. The waiver is incorporated because some of student for MA will have previous experience and some of the students will not have previous experience of social work.
It is clear from the statement that a product of company 'X' has good quality and is also available at a reasonable price. Hence, both the conclusion follow.
The statement says that greatest need in India is not for sophisticated gadgets but for programmers but this does not mean that there is an adequate number of sophisticated gadgets. Secondly, there is a need for programmers but it cannot be concluded that emphasis is being laid on procuring sophisticated gadgets. Hence, none of the conclusion follow.
Both the conclusion follow the statement as both correctly explain the given statement.
As given in the condition in the statement, the actor either will take the full payment for his recent show or will not take any money for the same. Hence, either of ,the conclusion follows.
Clearly, the statement declares that the dowry is an evil practice and reflects its demerits. Thus, Conclusion I follows. Also it is given that those who take dowry, dishonor womanhood. This implies that those who do not take dowry respect womanhood. So, conclusion II follows.
According to the statement, tenders are invited from contractors experienced in executing construction jobs. So, Conclusion I follows. The availability of competent tenderer s in construction is not mentioned. So Conclusion II does not follows.
Safety lockers are the best place to preserve valuables, it doesn't mean that valuables can not be preserved at any other place thus, Conclusion I does not follow. Conclusion II is opposite to the statement.
Only conclusion I follows as the person who emphasized the need to replace the present training program by other method, to bring out the real merit of the managers.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.